Who should lose when a company fails Annie? I would think it would be the owners (stockholders).
Michigan: Right to Work defeats Right to Pork
- Thread starter Pointgold
- Start date
Who should lose when a company fails Annie? I would think it would be the owners (stockholders).
How about some proof.
No wonder you are not a teacher anymore.
007
New member
Ok, unionised schoolteacher initiating ORGANISED bullying of one of her students.
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-10-04/news/34264504_1_republican-shirt-t-shirt-teacher
Unionised nurses attack Kennedy infant because his father works for the hated fox network.
http://abcnews.go.com/m/blogEntry?id=15807492
Continued union violence.
http://beforeitsnews.com/libertaria...olence-in-city-of-brotherly-love-2447152.html
Silence?
Figures!!
Last edited:
Althea
Althea told me...........
Who wasn't saved? And I asked you if Detroit's woes are a recent phenomenon? Do you have any data that suggests so?
Unions can be credited with improved working conditions many moons ago. Additionally, child protection laws are completely unneeded now. What the unions achieved is now status quo, and serve no purpose in 2012. Therefore, I can't prove a negative. Unions are now the bastion of corruption who work to push their political agendas, funded by looting money from their minions.
Their unnecessary existence is reflected in the fact that, when given the choice, a large number of workers will opt out of them.
Whether or not unions are needed wil not be known until after they are gone.
Nonetheless, you can't prove your statement, it is not a fact, just your opinion.
007
New member
You asked for proof, you got it.
You haven't the intellectual capacity to counter and I'm the retard?
OK rune!!
I am right, you are wrong.
You can't handle it.
Only 7% of the US is in a union, which says a lot. Businesses value human capital and safe working conditions are status quo.
What are they needed for? Please elaborate.
apple0154
MEOW
I think if a person is doing their job they should not be dismissed because the boss has a friend who needs a job or the boss doesn't like the employee's political views. What a tyrannical little despot you are or, rather, you aspire to be.
cawacko
Well-known member
Nice strawman dude. If you are going to argue for unions at least make a real argument. That isn't it.
apple0154
MEOW
'Union mob bosses'.
Someone's stuck in the '50's....like the rest of the GOP...
Amen to that! Obama must feel like he's got a mill-stone around his neck what with dealing with the Republican Congress.
No one 'ran away', dullard. You simply continue to demonstrate what an uniformed idiot you are when you purport that the need for collective bargaining is "outlandish".
7% of the private sector, which only says that anti-union forces have been very successful.
When the last union is gone and wages plumment and benefits are eliminated you will understand, but it will be too late. Why do you support those who opress you?
Zombie Jesus
Verified User
Ballgazer has been called a dullard more times than any other poster by more posters that I know of as well as a racist by more black posters than any other poster I know of, which kinda goes hand in hand if you ask me.
A fringe right neocon teabagger parrot of Beck, Limbaugh, beitbart.com, the Libertarian gay bath house scene in Chicago, and any other neocon teabagger that's devoid of original thought.
Discuss the topic, not me.
Exactly. She brings nothing new here. All the talking-point horseshit is the same with all righties, and we've heard it all a dozen times already. BORING.