Discuss the topic, not me.
Don't flatter yourself. No one cares about *you*; it's the collective *you* and all the rest of the retards on the right that're being laughed at and disproven, dullard.
Discuss the topic, not me.
Discuss the topic, not me.
Great, then address the topic. All you do is share your opinions/feelings on me and my ideology. Nothing personal, but I don't care what you think about me. Not here to make friends.Don't flatter yourself. No one cares about *you*; it's the collective *you* and all the rest of the retards on the right that're being laughed at and disproven, dullard.
Great, then address the topic. All you do is share your opinions/feelings on me and my ideology. Nothing personal, but I don't care what you think about me. Not here to make friends.
Debate something for once, if you are capable, which I am beginning to doubt.
Whining about me is the pinnacle of boring.
and some never learn that there time of influence has passed.
Unions can be credited with improved working conditions many moons ago. Additionally, child protection laws are completely unneeded now. What the unions achieved is now status quo, and serve no purpose in 2012. Therefore, I can't prove a negative. Unions are now the bastion of corruption who work to push their political agendas, funded by looting money from their minions.
Their unnecessary existence is reflected in the fact that, when given the choice, a large number of workers will opt out of them.
You've been saying nobody can refute your points yet you make this sweeping generalization about all unions. So my refutation is that your points are illogical.
Anyone who thinks unions are needed in 2012 is further behind than that.........
Unions are the epitome of corruption and completely unneeded.
What are unions needed for?I've addressed the topic to the extent that your stupid thread warrants it. I don't debate *you* and the rest of the retards on the right for reasons already explained. No one cares what you 'doubt', dullard.
It is my opinion unions are unnecessary. I have asked what their purpose currently serves, and haven't gotten a single answer. Perhaps you can be the first?You've been saying nobody can refute your points yet you make this sweeping generalization about all unions. So my refutation is that your points are illogical.
What are unions needed for?
And why are you so angry? This isn't a personal attack on 'Bijou'. Can you distinguish the difference?
Nice strawman dude. If you are going to argue for unions at least make a real argument. That isn't it.
It is my opinion unions are unnecessary. I have asked what their purpose currently serves, and haven't gotten a single answer. Perhaps you can be the first?
When you can share the one integral purpose all unions serve, let me know. It's obvious you know they are unnecessary but you can't defend such an absurd premise.No one's angry. You don't have that kind of power, here or elsewhere. Additionally, you don't have the intellect on this subject to engage me. But keep trying, dullard. It's humourous.
It is my opinion unions are unnecessary. I have asked what their purpose currently serves, and haven't gotten a single answer. Perhaps you can be the first?
.......Uh-huh. Massey Energy forced out unions and they're running one of the most corrupt industries ever. Surely it's not okay that miners die and safety infractions pile up just to keep CEO's like Blankenship in champagne and caviar?
"Massey forced the unions out, and now non-union coal miners have died in a coal mine cited for 600 violations in the past 18 months, so does the lack of a union contribute to safety concerns? "
When you can share the one integral purpose all unions serve, let me know. It's obvious you know they are unnecessary but you can't defend such an absurd premise.
Whining about me only makes you appear more clueless than you seem to already be.
Then perhaps a union serves a purpose for 'miners'. This doesn't explain why teachers, automobile industry, etc. need unions.Uh-huh. Massey Energy forced out unions and they're running one of the most corrupt industries ever. Surely it's not okay that miners die and safety infractions pile up just to keep CEO's like Blankenship in champagne and caviar?
"Massey forced the unions out, and now non-union coal miners have died in a coal mine cited for 600 violations in the past 18 months, so does the lack of a union contribute to safety concerns? "
Then perhaps a union serves a purpose for 'miners'. This doesn't explain why teachers, automobile industry, etc. need unions.
The people should be able to decide if they want to join a union. I suspect all the miners would, and many in other industries would opt out, as we saw in Wisconsin.
When you can share the one integral purpose all unions serve, let me know. It's obvious you know they are unnecessary but you can't defend such an absurd premise.
Whining about me only makes you appear more clueless than you seem to already be.
One integral purpose? Sure. Job security.