Which was my point. Criticizing one guy for being too loyal then later rejoicing in the loyalty of another while downplaying the loyalty of the first is silly.
Either he is too loyal or he is not loyal at all, he isn't both like Cypress wants it to be.
I've never said anybody shouldn't criticize Bush, or Obama for that matter.
I'll tell you what will happen.
"It's a good speech, but it doesn't negate 20 years of support... blah, blah".
This will still hurt Obama's campaign. So far I've been right. Fist that it was far bigger of a deal than the "It's already losing momentum in the news" ever thought of being.... Second that he would need to do something more than just say "I didn't know." And lastly that each time he does something it will come back to 20 years membership in a church that preaches anger isn't overcome by a speech....
Are the American people to dumb to understand that you can be a member of a church for 20 years yet not belive or support 100% of the preachers political views? You can be close friends with someone for 20 years but disagree with them politically?
He was not trying to overcome it by a speach, he was explaining how and why he has been associated with someone who he does not always agree with. It seems basic and simple to me.