Oceans were the hottest ever recorded in 2022: public discussion

Into the Night said:
Yes. So?

You still can't use a colder object to heat a warmer one.
Click to expand...

So yes, you are wrong, ... it is a transfer of thermal energy.

That's right, but you CAN use a cooler object to SLOW the COOLING of a warmer object.
 
Last edited:
Into the Night said:
I am not denying any theory of science. YOU are.

Buzzword fallacy.

No atom will absorb a photon that has lower energy than what the atom already has.

None of this is thermal energy, dude. No matter how you try, you cannot heat a warmer object with a colder one.
Click to expand...

If you find this stuff hard, or indeed impossible to understand, how would you ever get your head around concepts like quantum entanglement?
 
Into the Night said:
No, you just deny and discard it. You still think you can reduce entropy.
Click to expand...

You can reduce entropy locally so long as universally it increases.

Do you not believe that CRYSTALS exist? Because a crystal is a significantly lower entropy than a puddle of the molecules would be. Clearly you don't believe crystals exist. You don't believe in ice, you don't believe in snow, you don't believe in minerals.

Wow.
 
Bigdog said:
So yes, you are wrong, ... it is a transfer of thermal energy.

That's right, but you CAN use a cooler object to SLOW the COOLING of a warmer object.
Click to expand...

No, you can't. You can't heat a warmer object with a colder one.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot trap heat.
You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

You are again ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics and the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
 
Perry Phimosis said:
You can reduce entropy locally so long as universally it increases.

Do you not believe that CRYSTALS exist? Because a crystal is a significantly lower entropy than a puddle of the molecules would be. Clearly you don't believe crystals exist. You don't believe in ice, you don't believe in snow, you don't believe in minerals.

Wow.
Click to expand...

There is no 'locally'. You cannot reduce entropy...ever. You cannot compare two systems as if they are the same system. False equivalence fallacy. Homunculus fallacy. Entropy is NOT disorder.

You are still ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics. You cannot heat a warmer object with a colder one.
 
Let's have another go at this for the likes of ignorant peasants like Perry Thrombosis and McMoonshi'ite.

The Arctic is named for the north polar constellation “Arktos”—Greek for “bear.” It is 14.5 million square km (5.5 million square miles)—almost exactly the same size as Antarctica—and has been inhabited by humans for close to 20,000 years. It consists of the Arctic Ocean and surrounding land, including all of Greenland and Spitsbergen, and the northern parts of Alaska, Canada, Norway, and Russia. Its boundary is irregular and is often defined by either the northern limit of stands of trees on land, or by a mean July temperature of ~10°C (50°F).

Some of the land parts of the Arctic, like Greenland, are covered with ice sheets; others are not glaciated, and have lush tundra. These areas have large mammals, such as caribou, bears, wolves and foxes, and a variety of plants. In summer, migratory birds and other wildlife come to the Arctic to raise their young.

https://divediscover.whoi.edu/polar-regions/the-arctic-location-geography/
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
The Arctic Circle and the Arctic are not the same thing, nasty cunt.

The official definition of the Arctic region is the area where the average temperature in the warmest month of the year does not exceed 10ºC.
Click to expand...



Haw, haw...........................haw.


maggot, self-styled ' scientist ' has his head up his ass.

It's quite hilarious that the forum's premier Denier monkey has chosen to define the ' arctic ' as the limited area of temperature measurement used by ECOLOGISTS .

The Arctic is, of course, defined by the area within the Arctic Circle. Is now, always was- and forever will be,

Most scientists define the Arctic as the area within the Arctic Circle, a line of latitude about 66.5° north of the Equator.

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/arctic
Click to expand...


Edit; Has anybody noticed how hooked maggots wriggle ?


Haw, haw.....................................haw.
 
Last edited:
serendipity said:
Let's have another go at this for the likes of ignorant peasants like Perry Thrombosis and McMoonshi'ite.
Click to expand...


You're in jail, maggot. DO NOT PASS GO.

Most scientists define the Arctic as the area within the Arctic Circle, a line of latitude about 66.5° north of the Equator.

https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/arctic
Click to expand...

Haw, haw.................................haw.


Scuffling around for obscure opinions and phony definitions is about your level.

For the avoidance of doubt- neither maggot- nor the other asshole, Into the Night Soil- are ecologists- and therefore unqualified to attempt to align their scurrilous selves with ecological definitions- PARTICULARLY the Arctic, wherein they've been denying the plight of the indigenous species suffering from global warming at every opportunity.

Don't bother posting visiting hours, maggot.


Haw, haw...............................haw, haw, haw.................................haw, haw.............................haw.
 
Into the Night said:
Strawman fallacy.
Click to expand...

You're no longer in a position to be taken seriously, dumbass. Not that you ever were.

I'm saving your idiotic post, incidentally. I'll remind the forum of it every time you troll me.

Into the Night Soil

Sweden is not in the Arctic
Moon NOW thinks that Sweden is in the Arctic!
Click to expand...


https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...ever-recorded-in-2022-public-discussion/page3 #35
Click to expand...


Haw, haw...............................haw.
 
serendipity said:
Let's have another go at this for the likes of ignorant peasants like Perry Thrombosis and McMoonshi'ite.

The Arctic is named for the north polar constellation “Arktos”—Greek for “bear.” It is 14.5 million square km (5.5 million square miles)—almost exactly the same size as Antarctica—and has been inhabited by humans for close to 20,000 years. It consists of the Arctic Ocean and surrounding land, including all of Greenland and Spitsbergen, and the northern parts of Alaska, Canada, Norway, and Russia. Its boundary is irregular and is often defined by either the northern limit of stands of trees on land, or by a mean July temperature of ~10°C (50°F).

Some of the land parts of the Arctic, like Greenland, are covered with ice sheets; others are not glaciated, and have lush tundra. These areas have large mammals, such as caribou, bears, wolves and foxes, and a variety of plants. In summer, migratory birds and other wildlife come to the Arctic to raise their young.

https://divediscover.whoi.edu/polar-regions/the-arctic-location-geography/
Click to expand...

McMoonshi'ite has never heard of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution which is the world’s independent leader in ocean discovery, exploration, and education. The dozy cunt is truly fucking insane.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top