Question for evolutionists

Fentoine Lum said:
Oh now it's "someone"? Well isn't that interesting. See if you can read up on biology (developmental and otherwise), biochemistry, genetics and the scientific method. May help you out of this circular flushed spiral you're in publicly.
Click to expand...

I'm not the one arguing something in reality that NO ONE witnessed first hand. Each of my examples was witnessed that way and written about so even idiots like you can understand it.
 
CFM said:
I'm not the one arguing something in reality that NO ONE witnessed first hand. Each of my examples was witnessed that way and written about so even idiots like you can understand it.
Click to expand...

Nope, all you have is "someone wrote it and I chose to believe it". What is your objection to being educated and informed?
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Nah, you have no knowledge of that first hand or otherwise. what you have is, someone wrote something. Period.
Click to expand...

So the founding fathers didn't witness the writing of the Constitution we can read today?

You lost, son. The best thing you can do is what you do best and that's find some nigger asshole to kiss or post something else about an inferior banjo brought by an inferior group that had to be made what it is by superior people.
 
CFM said:
So the founding fathers didn't witness the writing of the Constitution we can read today?

You lost, son. The best thing you can do is what you do best and that's find some nigger asshole to kiss or post something else about an inferior banjo brought by an inferior group that had to be made what it is by superior people.
Click to expand...

I lost an argument you made on my behalf to yourself?
 
Fentoine Lum said:
You're aware we can all go read through the thread again, are you not?
Click to expand...
Sure. Go right ahead.
Fentoine Lum said:
You're not discussing evolution, you're blathering on about a personal belief system you feel is threatened, silly.
Click to expand...
We are discussing evolution here. Like other discussing evolution here. We are each imposing our personal belief system on the discussion.

Why don't you join the discussion instead of going off on insult and psychoquackery tangents like this?
 
Into the Night said:
Sure. Go right ahead.

We are discussing evolution here. Like other discussing evolution here. We are each imposing our personal belief system on the discussion.

Why don't you join the discussion instead of going off on insult and psychoquackery tangents like this?
Click to expand...

Mutation, Mutagens, and DNA Repair
Copyright 1998 by Beth A. Montelone, Ph. D., Division of Biology, Kansas State University; originally written as a supplement to BIOL400, Human Genetics.
http://www-personal.k-state.edu/~bethmont/mutdes.html

Discuss, please do.
 
Into the Night said:
Non-sequitur. Single celled organisms have neither blood nor a circulatory system.
Click to expand...

High School Biology 5 points


The cytoplasm in a single-celled organism and
the circulatory system in a human both
(1) break down molecules into smaller components
(2) release energy to be used by the organism
(3) transport substances throughout the organism
(4) distribute blood to all of the parts of the
organism

https://brainly.com/question/497634

Let the semantics begin.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
Do you ever get dizzy?

Mutations arise randomly and rather routinely, many are detected and corrected via cellular repair mechanisms. Natural selection is not random. You seem to be the only one confused, and your arguments are random.

Here's how those who do understand explain.
...deleted redundant quote of the Theory of Natural Selection...
Click to expand...

Irrational. Natural selection is not random mutation. The theory is a paradox. It is falsified.

Science does not use supporting evidence.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
High School Biology 5 points


The cytoplasm in a single-celled organism and
the circulatory system in a human both
(1) break down molecules into smaller components
(2) release energy to be used by the organism
(3) transport substances throughout the organism
(4) distribute blood to all of the parts of the
organism

https://brainly.com/question/497634

Let the semantics begin.
Click to expand...

Then there were al the other examples others also contributed like sponges, coral, etc., you know, the stuff you're avoiding here.
 
Fentoine Lum said:
So if you cannot/will not define your understanding of a word/term we're both using in an argument, I am attempting to undefine the word?

Pffffffffffffffffffffft.
Click to expand...

You have already undefined the word for your use. You will have to redefine 'mutation' before I accept your use of it.
 
Into the Night said:
Irrational. Natural selection is not random mutation. The theory is a paradox. It is falsified.

Science does not use supporting evidence.
Click to expand...

You're an idioted zealot with an irrational belief system to support and this has both been explained and cited repeatedly for you over days.

Mutations. What are they to you?

Natural selection, a completely different mechanism/phenomenon. What is your understanding?

You're aware they are NOT the same thing? or No?
 
Into the Night said:
You have already undefined the word for your use. You will have to redefine 'mutation' before I accept your use of it.
Click to expand...
.
You don't have your own? You're using the term. Just google it if you don't know or are uncomfortable and post that.

Maybe you can explain your use of "undefine" since it seems to be a tactic of your own.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top