So we have a US born American citizen being held without trial

As soon as someone is born in the US, he is a citizen and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. You obviously didn't think this through.

Wrong and clueless. I was born in Germany to an American father and a naturalized German mother. I wasn't given German citizenship. I was given a US citizenship.

Just as you cannot just drop a baby here if you are a citizen of another nations jurisdiction. That baby takes on the nationality of their parents.

You should do more research and get out of the basement more often. You obviously don't have a clue of what you are emoting about.

All who are born in the US,

Wrong. Not if their parents are neither a citizen or a permanent resident.

unless diplomatic restrictions are at play (recognized diplomatic immunity), are subject to the jurisdiction of the US. If you would consider eliminating your conflation of "child" with "parents," you would see a clearer picture.

You just destroyed your own argument. Yay you!
 
About the only thing Christian Nation SCOTUS uses the US Constitution Bill of Rights for is it’s Christiananlity pedophilia Federal Lynching KKKidnapping churchstate of hate drug trafficking fiefdom enforcement of KKKilling US Navy doctors for McHeil’s Navy not so master race not so master plan of “serve the Pope or die” WW II contracts of Islam oil for Mengele “Angel of Death” National baptize thine eyes by urinations religion under color of human reproduction medical pseudoscience law…..
moron-alert.gif
 
Must be one of those thieving US Navy Hospital US Constitution Bill of Rights baptize thine eyes by urinations of McHeil’s Navy arsonists with Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist Bicentennial Fourth Reich July granted standing for KKKilling a US Navy doctor or US Fascist Masochist Federal Lynching KKKidnapping Christiananality pedophilia mentality of that not so master race not so master plan of Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist “what is 9/11 ?” rhetorical Freudian slip those crooks on Capital Hill are so patriotic act proud in Islamidiotocracy pedophilia Valhalla…..
 
Illegal aliens are subjects to the jurisdiction of their originating nation ONLY.
Not when they are in the US, at which point they are subject to the jurisdiction of the US.

They are NOT subjects of US jurisdiction!
How do you explain aliens being deported? How do you explain aliens being in court?

The DID violate US law. They are subject to deportation.
Sure, the parents did. The child born in the US did not. As I recall, you are still on tap to articulate what law the child violated.

The child is not the parent's?????????????
Was that too complicated for you? Let me try dumbing down the wording. The child of the parents is a totally different person from either of the parents.

This is where we make the ultra-leap of logic and state that the child is not the parents. If I went to fast, let me know.

The child is of alien enemies.
... but not of hostile occupation. You can't omit that part.

The child is of alien enemies.
... but not of hostile occupation. You can't omit that part.

No court has ANY authority over ANY constitution.
The Supreme Court has full authority to try cases involving controversies to which the United States shall be a Party.

US Constitution, Article III. Section. 2.
The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;—to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;—to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;—to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;—to Controversies between two or more States;— between a State and Citizens of another State,—between Citizens of different States,—between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.


Irrelevant. No court has ANY authority over ANY constitution.
The Supreme Court has full authority to try cases involving controversies to which the United States shall be a Party.

The children are born of alien enemies.
... but not of hostile occupation. You can't omit that part.

They do NOT magickally become citizens just because illegal aliens produced offspring.
... but they do magickally become citizens by the mere fact that the illegal alien parents gave birth to them in the US.

NOTHING in the 14th amendment grants any citizenship to illegal aliens or their offspring.
... except for the 14th Amendment itself, which grants citizenship to all children born in the US, assuming their parents are not alien enemies in hostile occupation or diplomatic representatives of a foreign State

You don't seem to have any wiggle room. The Supreme Court is authorized to try cases under Article III, and The Supreme Court already decided this issue in United States v. Wong Kim Ark. If your hope is that the Supreme Court will not act on precedent and will instead reverse itself, I believe you are setting yourself up with unreasonable expectations. If you believe that the States will take up a Constitutional Amendment, you're going to need to see a whole lot more grass roots movement across the country in addition to just President Trump's wild stab at working a slavery angle.
 
He's right for the case he's describing.
He is so far off base that his argument has already toppled. Look, any rational adult should be able to read the 14th Amendment and understand the obviousness of the law.

He is not 'misreading' the Constitution.
It's like he's trying to read the Constitution but all he sees is Greek. He's getting it all wrong.

He even quoted the relevant material to you, and you completely ignored it.
I'm the one, and the only one, who has quoted the relevant material, which tells the world exactly how this is going to play out. You are not going to be on the correct side of this. Birthright citizenship is an inalienable right bestowed by one's Creator who decided to have the birth occur in the US.
 
There is no such thing as "birthright" citizenship for individuals who are not citizens or permanent residence card holders no matter how many times you claim the opposite to be true.
... except that this is the de facto inalienable right shared by all who are born in the US, and you are simply pouting in denial. Open your eyes; see if that will help.

In fact, I can't think of any country where that is true.
Only in the US. Your country can't be better than all the others if it is just like all the others.
 
About the only thing Christian Nation SCOTUS uses the US Constitution Bill of Rights for is it’s Christiananlity pedophilia Federal Lynching KKKidnapping churchstate of hate drug trafficking fiefdom enforcement of KKKilling US Navy doctors for McHeil’s Navy not so master race not so master plan of “serve the Pope or die” WW II contracts of Islam oil for Mengele “Angel of Death” National baptize thine eyes by urinations religion under color of human reproduction medical pseudoscience law…..
You said it all.

10e999ac9f148d6b28d16e07c11086dc.jpg
 
I was born in Germany to an American father and a naturalized German mother.
You were very fortunate in many ways. Where, specifically, in Deutschland, were you born?

Just as you cannot just drop a baby here if you are a citizen of another nations jurisdiction.
There's a difference between dropping a baby off in the US and giving birth to the baby in the US. Giving birth to the baby in the US bestows US citizenship to the baby under the 14th Amendment. Have you taken a look at it? I think it will clear up a lot of your confusion.

That baby takes on the nationality of their parents.
Oooops, nope. You definitely need to read the 14th Amendment as well as United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

You should do more research and get out of the basement more often.
I have all of the relevant information, which I am trying emphatically to get you to review.

Wrong. Not if their parents are neither a citizen or a permanent resident.
Both Into the Night and you suffer from the strange conflation misconception that a child is somehow his parents. You aren't going to be able to discuss this topic rationally until you understand that no child is his parents.
 
Back
Top