The History of the Democrat Party

lets face it, anyone that refers to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party is a brainwashed tool of the corporate sponsored propaganda machine.
...or being accurate, since there's nothing democratic about the Democrat party.
 
Where is public healthcare prohibited in the constitution?
Thanks for pointing out the inability of liberals to read and interpret the Founding Documents. The Constitution states what the government can do and any power not mentioned stays with the People. This is stated plainly in the 2nd paragraph of the Declaration of Independence, again in the preamble to the Constitution, again in Amendment IX, and again in Amendment X.
 
Where is public healthcare prohibited in the constitution?
That would be Amendment 10... Wherein if it doesn't fit in any of the enumerated powers of the Federal government it would not be something that they would be allowed to muck about in...
 
I can't help noticing that when I mention the Constitution, and specifically the Enumerated Powers, liberals tend to scatter like cockroaches when you turn on the light.
 
Actually, the 4th amendment against unreasonable search & siezures prohibits much of what is in the patriot act.

The US Constitution, not the executive branch, should be used to determine what is legal or illegal in surveillance.
 
Actually, the 4th amendment against unreasonable search & siezures prohibits much of what is in the patriot act.

The US Constitution, not the executive branch, should be used to determine what is legal or illegal in surveillance.
Is there a specific section of the Patriot Act that you have issue with?
 
Is there a specific section of the Patriot Act that you have issue with?

The portion that allows internet and phone taps without warrants?

The sections that allow the use of a "national security letter", which in addition to not requiring court approval, forbod the company being targetted from mentioning that the search was made.

The portions of the act that allow search warrants without showing probable cause.




Those are some of the issues I have with what was done under the guise of the Patriot Act.
 
The portion that allows internet and phone taps without warrants?

The sections that allow the use of a "national security letter", which in addition to not requiring court approval, forbod the company being targetted from mentioning that the search was made.

The portions of the act that allow search warrants without showing probable cause.




Those are some of the issues I have with what was done under the guise of the Patriot Act.
Phone taps on who?
 
Actually, the 4th amendment against unreasonable search & siezures prohibits much of what is in the patriot act.

The US Constitution, not the executive branch, should be used to determine what is legal or illegal in surveillance.

try telling that to the last 145 years of federal courts. I've been trying to and it falls on the deaf ears of republicans and democrats alike.
 
Talking with who?

That does not matter at all.

"Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
 
try telling that to the last 145 years of federal courts. I've been trying to and it falls on the deaf ears of republicans and democrats alike.

Because both parties, regardless of what either one says, are far more interested in increasing their power than in upholding the US Constitution.
 
That does not matter at all.

"Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Actually it matters very much. Why not answer the question?
 
Actually it matters very much. Why not answer the question?

No, it does not matter at all. What matters is that the requirements of the 4th amendment of the US Constitution are not being met.

Try reading this again:

"Amendment IV: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

It does not mention any exceptions concerning who is being communicated with. It says "no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized".
 
Back
Top