Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
"Again, how is that comparison of the two not the main point of the article? The comparison is the basis for the argument that the portion of Obamas solution is somehow more impacting than offshore drilliing. But I know... it isn't what YOU wanted to focus on."
The point was that the GOP it touting offshore drilling & ridiculing Obama's suggestion, but that neither makes a huge impact, and both can be part of a more comprehensive approach. You honed in on the one part of it and ran with that; the whole idea is that it's stupid for McCain to be ridiculing the tire suggestion, because the difference between that & the impact of offshore drilling is negligible. Yes, the article uses the Bush admin stats & based on those, speculates that the impact of checking tires would be more, but the MAIN point of the article - that it's stupid to make fun of Obama's suggestion - doesn't change if you use other stats, and drilling is closer to checking tires, or would even have more of an impact than checking tires.
You're just too stupid to see that. I'm consistently amazed by the depth of your stupidity. Go ahead now - give me your best "LMAO" and call me a good little lemming as you attempt to distract even further in defense of your Messiah.
Yes, both can be a part of the solution.... But you and the article and Bush are flat out wrong on the impact of off shore drilling. The comparison used by your article and highlighted by you are faulty. The fact that they were based on Bush estimates simply made it funny as well.
Again, you fail to address the point I did make about his "suggestion". It assumes that the bulk of the country doesn't already do so and the comparison assumes that oil is used by vehicles only. It is not only misleading but quite dishonest. Which I believe was the whole point of your whine fest on the other thread.