Trump: 34 felony counts, no misdeamors

[Into the Night]

That's wild speculation. Prosecutors generally HAVE to present credible evidence on both sides if they have it. And they have to make the case that an actual crime was committed.

It would be beyond stupid for a prosecutor to try to cherrypick if he felt it couldn't hold up in court, once the defense can present a case.

No crime is listed on the indictment or the facts and specifications. What are you 'holding up in court'??

Trump is about to be indicted again, btw.

And it will be just as pointless.

You twits don't get it, do you? Every time you do this, Trump's poll numbers increase in his favor. More contribute to his campaign fund. You are shooting yourselves not in the foot, but in the head.

 

[Into the Night]

Just how can it be pointless, when you know none of the evidence against him?

What evidence??? The indictment is public now. The facts and specification is public too.

 

[Into the Night]

Doesn't change I can make assumptions, 'educated' guesses, etc., on that which I did.

The only 'evidence' is a predisposition by the jury. That much is obvious.

 

[Into the Night]

do you see how your logic is circular?

the 'no true scotsman' argument it's called.

look it up, dum dum.

Fallacy fallacy. There was no True Scotsman fallacy that occurred. A circular argument fallacy (which DID occur) is not a True Scotsman fallacy.

 

[Into the Night]

It is a house of cards.

With no cards in it.

There really is nothing here. I can't even find any felony charges listed in either the indictment or the facts and specifications.

 

[Into the Night]

I'll check it out, even though you called me a bad name.

Check what out? The indictment? I've read it. The facts and specifications? I've read it. There is nothing there.

 

[Into the Night]

Looks like Braggs brains did not get him into Harvard.

What's so great about Harvard?

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Fallacy fallacy. There was no True Scotsman fallacy that occurred. A circular argument fallacy (which DID occur) is not a True Scotsman fallacy.

A No True Scotsman would be in this sort of thread, the Left's proposition that if you argue in favor of Trump in any way shape or form, and don't totally agree he should go to prison, you are a Trump supporter and anti-American.

No True American would support Trump...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Not a True Scotsman fallacy. A Guilt by Association fallacy and bulverism (also a fallacy).

An example of a True Scotsman fallacy:

"No real communism has ever been tried."

Yes, it is.

To paraphrase the example: Angus declares that Americans think Trump is a criminal to which Lachlan points out that he's an American and doesn't think Trump is a criminal. Furious, like a Scotsman, Angus yells that a TRUE American thinks Trump is a criminal.

 

[Kamala Trump]

Fallacy fallacy. There was no True Scotsman fallacy that occurred. A circular argument fallacy (which DID occur) is not a True Scotsman fallacy.

this one has aspects of both. no true scotsman is also a circular argument.

 

[Into the Night]

Yes, it is.

To paraphrase the example: Angus declares that Americans think Trump is a criminal to which Lachlan points out that he's an American and doesn't think Trump is a criminal. Furious, like a Scotsman, Angus yells that a TRUE American thinks Trump is a criminal.

Corrected. I missed the part where you demonstrated the fallacy correctly. Apologies.

 

[Into the Night]

this one has aspects of both. no true scotsman is also a circular argument.

A True Scotsman fallacy is not a circular argument fallacy or even a circular argument at all. It is a divisional error.

 

[Nordberg]

A No True Scotsman would be in this sort of thread, the Left's proposition that if you argue in favor of Trump in any way shape or form, and don't totally agree he should go to prison, you are a Trump supporter and anti-American.

No True American would support Trump...

In fact, almost all the left is glad he got indicted. I agree with that, but I do not say he will be found guilty. That is unknown. The left is waiting for his trial. And his Georgia trial. And his rape trial. and his DC trial. Those are in his near and not-so-near future.

 

[Kamala Trump]

A True Scotsman fallacy is not a circular argument fallacy or even a circular argument at all. It is a divisional error.

no it's a circular argument.

youre wrong again.

and fascism is the union of state and corporate power.

 

[Into the Night]

no it's a circular argument.

youre wrong again.

and fascism is the union of state and corporate power.

Redefinition fallacies. No argument presented.

 

[Into the Night]

In fact, almost all the left is glad he got indicted. I agree with that, but I do not say he will be found guilty. That is unknown. The left is waiting for his trial. And his Georgia trial. And his rape trial. and his DC trial. Those are in his near and not-so-near future.

Trying to backpedal now? Paradox. Irrational. You are denying your own posts again.

 

[Kamala Trump]

it's uses moral purity and circularity, technically.

a d.a. didn't bring a bad suit because a d.a wouln't bring a bad suit.

moral purity and circularity together.

 

[ThatOwlWoman]

oh we know that after six years....."fuck the law, fuck the truth.......all that matters is negative attention"....people like you are we can't keep nice things....

Yep. People like me are exactly why you can't keep "nice things" like corrupt fascist pigs like your Golden Calf.

 

[Into the Night]

Falsifying business records, conspiracy. Obviously Bragg has the goods.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. That's not illegal.
What records have been falsified??

What goods?? Where's the beef?

 

[Into the Night]

Conspiracy is going to nail him.

There are recordings with Cohen and others conspiring to cover up the hush money payments to both Daniels, and Pecker.

The Democrat party is a conspiracy. That's not illegal.
Nothing was 'covered up'. The expense was accounted for.