Trump: 34 felony counts, no misdeamors

[Poor Richard Saunders]

And the National Enquirer guy.

The National Enquirer was directly involved as the point of the catch and kill campaign for Trump leading up the election to catch and kill any of the scandals Trump would face.

It is reported, that the National Enquirer had made some payments for Trump, to that end, when their inhouse lawyers warned them these would be considered campaign contributions and thus against the law if not disclosed. Pecker, the Enquirer guy, then informed Trump, one of his best friends, that they could not make the payments for the catch and Kill due to it being a Campaign finance violation That is when the National Enquirer refused to pay any more and COhen instead started to pay with the money he got from Trump.

Pecker, Trumps good friend at the time, is now fully cooperating for his amnesty deal. You can expect he has admitted he told Trump directly that they could not pay anymore due to campaign finance laws and then Trump went about doing same thru Cohen.

Checkmate!

Pecker was given immunity for his illegal campaign contributions in order to testify. Hidden in the statement of facts it appears that one of the crimes being covered up was that AMI also falsified business records in their payments.

 

[Kamala Trump]

Ita all in the indictment which you will never bother to read.

please answer the questions as instructed.

 

[Concart]

Pecker was given immunity for his illegal campaign contributions in order to testify. Hidden in the statement of facts it appears that one of the crimes being covered up was that AMI also falsified business records in their payments.

Yep. And the repayment to Cohen was treated as income, again, a crime under New York law.

 

[BidenPresident]

Yep. And the repayment to Cohen was treated as income, again, a crime under New York law.

Correct.

 

[QP!]

Trump is not the brightest bulb on the tree. So he inadvertently admits to the crimes he commits. In this case, he suggested that these payments could be delayed until after the election, at which point they would probably not have to pay them at all. That is, obviously, an admission that the payments were for the purposes of influencing the campaign.

Ooops.

Yup.

They apparently have Trump directly saying just that. Can we delay this and string it out until after the election so i can just not pay them off. Stiff them like i stiff everyone else.

Meaning he did not give a shit if Melania found out, it was all for the sake of the Campaign.

checkmate!

 

[Into the Night]

You are truly an idiot, my dear. The indictment is public the evidence is not.

What evidence??? There is nothing in the indictment of any consequence. No felonies are listed at all.

 

[Into the Night]

IMHO, his problem is more cognitive processing than a general lack of intelligence. The manifesto he links in his signature, and his socks, indicates at least average intelligence but also a detachment from reality.

Your socks are not mine, dumbass.

 

[QP!]

Yep. And the repayment to Cohen was treated as income, again, a crime under New York law.

Not according to our slumlord lawyer PostModernProfit.

He was making the claim that Trump could give Cohen hundreds of thousand of dollars and just call it all 'legal fees' and as long as Cohen invoiced him as such, Trump is doing it above board and legal. So Cohen was trying to hide the flow thru payment by invoicing Trump double the amount he paid, so he (Cohen) could pay income tax on it.

Imagine being a slumlord lawyer, like Prophet and thinking that would be legal as long as the lawyer provides you an invoice for 'legal services'. FLOL at that shortbus lawyer.

 

[Into the Night]

you don't read good.

You don't write good.

 

[Into the Night]

That makes sense. Trump Dummy, Grok and Sybil all like to type one-handed too.

So you are one handed?

 

[Into the Night]

Trump is an indicted criminal! The type of crimes you can go to jail! And this only New York! There's still Georgia and Dept of justice that could bring more charges!
What is there to Support about Trump?

What crime? Where's the beef?

 

[Into the Night]

What do prices have to do with Trump's crimes?

What crimes?

 

[Into the Night]

The crime is the 34 indictments,the victim is society, Trump is no different than anyone else, he is not above the law.

There is only one indictment. It lists no felonies. How is society a victim of something that isn't specified?
Lawlessness is not law.

 

[floridafan]

What evidence??? There is nothing in the indictment of any consequence. No felonies are listed at all.

You again continue to prove what a flaming idiot you are.

 

[Concart]

Not according to our slumlord lawyer PostModernProfit.

He was making the claim that Trump could give Cohen hundreds of thousand of dollars and just call it all 'legal fees' and as long as Cohen invoiced him as such, Trump is doing it above board and legal. So Cohen was trying to hide the flow thru payment by invoicing Trump double the amount he paid, so he (Cohen) could pay income tax on it.

Imagine being a slumlord lawyer, like Prophet and thinking that would be legal as long as the lawyer provides you an invoice for 'legal services'. FLOL at that shortbus lawyer.

Legal services are income to the lawyer. This was a reimbursement of an expense that Trump CLASSIFIED as income to the lawyer, because he had to in order to hide the payment. I guess PMP is probably a tax cheat too.

 

[Into the Night]

No you are reflexively defending Trump.

So?

You do not know what Bragg has

He has an indictment that contains nothing. He has a facts and specifications that contains nothing. He is exposing himself to a malicious prosecution lawsuit.

or does not have and yet,

He does not have a list of felonies. He does not have a specification.

from a computer, in butt fuck nowhere state as if you are expert that Bragg has nothing.

The indictment is public, dumbass. So is the facts and specifications. THEY CONTAIN NOTHING.

All that matters to you is your feelings while you ignore the facts,

It is YOU ignoring the facts. YOU are ignoring the nothing documents that the indictment and the facts and specifications are.

in a reflexive defense of Trump.

So?

 

[Into the Night]

And the National Enquirer guy.

The National Enquirer was directly involved as the point of the catch and kill campaign for Trump leading up the election to catch and kill any of the scandals Trump would face.

It is reported, that the National Enquirer had made some payments for Trump, to that end, when their inhouse lawyers warned them these would be considered campaign contributions and thus against the law if not disclosed. Pecker, the Enquirer guy, then informed Trump, one of his best friends, that they could not make the payments for the catch and Kill due to it being a Campaign finance violation That is when the National Enquirer refused to pay any more and COhen instead started to pay with the money he got from Trump.

Pecker, Trumps good friend at the time, is now fully cooperating for his amnesty deal. You can expect he has admitted he told Trump directly that they could not pay anymore due to campaign finance laws and then Trump went about doing same thru Cohen.

Checkmate!

You're on the wrong chessboard.

 

[Into the Night]

Trump is not the brightest bulb on the tree. So he inadvertently admits to the crimes he commits. In this case, he suggested that these payments could be delayed until after the election, at which point they would probably not have to pay them at all. That is, obviously, an admission that the payments were for the purposes of influencing the campaign.

Ooops.

What crimes?

 

[Into the Night]

Pecker was given immunity for his illegal campaign contributions in order to testify. Hidden in the statement of facts it appears that one of the crimes being covered up was that AMI also falsified business records in their payments.

What was 'covered up'?

 

[Into the Night]

Yep. And the repayment to Cohen was treated as income, again, a crime under New York law.

Income is not a crime.