Irish Exit
Verified User
Apaprebtly you didn't bother reading the article since the reporter in question is the source
Trump argues in court filing that he can limit journalists' access to White House
- Thread starter Nomad
- Start date
Apaprebtly you didn't bother reading the article since the reporter in question is the source
when is the last time you saw a reporters ask 4 questions after a long winded debate type premise on the first question? that's not a followup, it's a fillibuster
Enrollment reached its highest point in the 1970s.
In 1973, 60,000 American Indian children are estimated to have been enrolled in an Indian boarding school.[17][18] The rise of pan-Indian activism, tribal nations' continuing complaints about the schools, and studies in the late 1960s and mid-1970s (such as the Kennedy Report and the National Study of American Indian Education) led to passage of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975.
This emphasized decentralization of students from boarding schools to community schools. As a result, many large Indian boarding schools closed in the 1980s and early 1990s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_boarding_schools
In 1973, 60,000 American Indian children are estimated to have been enrolled in an Indian boarding school.[17][18] The rise of pan-Indian activism, tribal nations' continuing complaints about the schools, and studies in the late 1960s and mid-1970s (such as the Kennedy Report and the National Study of American Indian Education) led to passage of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975.
This emphasized decentralization of students from boarding schools to community schools. As a result, many large Indian boarding schools closed in the 1980s and early 1990s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Indian_boarding_schools
Getin the ring
Verified User
Trump can ban anyone he want's to from the white house grounds, he's the boss
move on, she lost
move on, she lost
What bothers me is not whether he can or cannot.
What bothers me is that he is willing to try...and that the useful idiots who continue to support him are willing to defend his doing so.
Acosta is there to ask tough questions...which is a great deal of what he was doing.
If there truly is "no freedom to be an ass at a press conference"...Donald Trump should avoid them no matter what.
I know.. Trump tries to use his press conference as a political rally. He doesn't want to answer any questions. He wants to promote his celebrity.
That is exactly what I saw...and I heard him respond with, "Pardon me, Ma'am, I'm...(asking a question.)"
If there was an assault (I do not think there was)...it was on the part of the zealous intern.
Why can't he be both...which probably is the case?
I don't think there is a judge that would be willing to suggest that White House press events are a first amendment right.
I could be wrong.
You're a lying partisan hack. Acosta refused to accept Trumps measured responses to his moronic accusations, and when Acosta started yelling and yammering and hogging the Mike, Trump, the adult in the room, had had enough.
STFU, you brain dead harpy.
Acosta didn't yell or hog the mic.. He asked a follow up question that Trump didn't want to answer. You do know a press conference is NOT a political rally regardless of what "father Trump" tells you???
I hope all conservatives aren't as weak and looking for daddy as you are.
Fentoine Lum
Verified User
And when you put it like that, isn't that what Don's antics are really rooted in? His daddy issues?
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Not according to Fox News!
In fact, John Roberts gets the same treatment by Sarah Husky Sanders and Donald Trump as Jim Acosta. Because, for one he intentionally asks the same questions that Jim asked, when Sarah or Donald skirts around Jim's questions and tells him to shut up and sit down and crap. They don't answer John's questions either.
And that is why Fox News has put out public statements that they are siding with CNN on this issue. And if Jim gets permanently banned, John Roberts will be the next victim of the White House to get banned. Stay tuned.
"The White House Correspondents' Association is also backing CNN. The group said Tuesday that the president "should not be in the business of arbitrarily picking the men and women who cover him."
I think so... I think he was neglected growing up.
Kamala Trump
Verified User
he wasn't asking tough questions, he was arguing about what "invasion" means, and refusing to hand over the mic when his turn was over. what a hero!
Kamala Trump
Verified User
you guys look like idiots to normal people.
the new world order is cancelled, due to it being retard-based.
the new world order is cancelled, due to it being retard-based.
Adolf_Twitler
Verified User
Donald Trump is so wrapped up in himself, he thinks the Special Council is not even allowed to ask him certain questions. If fact, Donald Trump is still determining which Special Council questions he will entertain, and which ones he won't. Sorry folks, but it don't work like that! Donald Trump is going to get his ass subpoenaed, and it's coming soon!
And that is how Donald Trump approaches questions asked of him by the press. If the answer to a question is an embarrassment for the president, he insults the one asking the question, and tells them to shut up and sit down etc- Same way Sarah the huckster treats embarrassing questions!
Answering all questions, and not just soft questions, is the job of the White House whether they like it or not, and the vocal majority is going to demand this president answer important questions.
And that is how Donald Trump approaches questions asked of him by the press. If the answer to a question is an embarrassment for the president, he insults the one asking the question, and tells them to shut up and sit down etc- Same way Sarah the huckster treats embarrassing questions!
Answering all questions, and not just soft questions, is the job of the White House whether they like it or not, and the vocal majority is going to demand this president answer important questions.