trump: oblivious moron or psychotically narcissistic oblivious moron?

Apparently, Millie finds her hide-from bunker insufficient protection. She also sought the added protection of flinging feeble insults from behind EllipsisBoy's skirts, who then participates in a Deplorable Pas de Deux in search of Millie's skirts.
 
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree



DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016






In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
 
blackvegetable said:
Uh...no......Jayne was credited with a very high IQ.....but I don't believe anyone ranked her above Albert.
Click to expand...
No you're right I am thinking of Marilyn Monroe who was reputed to have an IQ of 168. Jayne Mansfield still had bigger tits though and could speak five languages.

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
 
Milagro said:
Do you know what really pisses me off? You and I rarely agree about that much but we now like brothers in arms battling a common foe. As they say in Yorkshire, there's not so queer as folk!

Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Click to expand...

and you are both dependent on the same meager quiver.....
 
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree*(11/05/2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause*(10/31/2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause*(10/26/2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (03/22/2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (03/08/2012)
2009
Debevoise Order*(12/01/2009)
Debevoise Opinion*(12/01/2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief*(06/26/2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (06/26/2009)
RNC Reply Brief*(02/19/2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate*(01/19/2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion*(11/03/2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (11/03/2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (11/03/2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (11/03/2008)
Minute Entry (11/03/2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal*(02/03/2005)
Malone en banc Decision*(11/09/2004)
Malone Appellate Decision*(11/01/2004)
Malone Order*(11/01/2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief*(11/01/2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint*(10/31/2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention*(10/28/2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene*(10/28/2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order*(11/02/2004)
Daschle SD Complaint*(11/01/2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (10/31/2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (11/05/1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (07/27/1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree*(11/01/1982)
Complaint*(02/11/1982)
*



https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-...consent-decree
 
RickyTavy said:
19511138_1423675884419859_1456751289502020743_n.jpg
Click to expand...

Yuck. More things that can't be unseen....
 
Cosmos said:
Of course. I have to admit, there's no one more fun to make fun of than Ricky (Chickenshit) Tavy. But even he gets boring rather quickly.
Click to expand...

I don't care how desperately you need me, Fecal Freak, I have no interest in your deviancies. Weren't you leaving some time ago? I think you've suck up to everyone you can here.
 
go read the court filings and cases asshole right wing evil shits


YOUR PARTY HAS CHEATED VOTERS OUT OF THEIR RIGHTS TO VOTE FOR DECADES


court documented right up to the SCOTUS
 
RickyTavy said:
It has often been said that the first duty of a president is to protect the people and the sovereignty of the United States. The president swears to protect and defend the Constitution. It is indisputable that Russia launched an attack on US sovereignty and by attacking our electoral process attacked the Constitution.

Reports are that trump subordinates are bothered by their inability to get trump to deal with this matter, because he always sees the topic as simply an attack on his laughable legitimacy. They are hesitant to bring up the issue, because it provokes trumpy tantrums. Today, the American ambassador to the UN testified that she has been given no instructions for dealing with Russia and has not even had a conversation with our feckless leader regarding the Russian assault on our sovereignty.

Think any of the trump-fluffing groupies will be the least bothered by that? Think it will tarnish the phony patriotism the goose-steppers wear on their sleeves?
Click to expand...

Sounds like Trump colluded with the Russians.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top