You can't even spell science, you deranged old trollop.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
when you guys finish up flocking here, please cool it with the flames in current events..welcome
To whom?
I like him but he's not to everyone's taste.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Have they always been arseholes?Well, good luck on that, anatta. You just inherited the dregs of the dregs. And you're welcome to them. I'm just here to tuck 'em in.
Of course. I have to admit, there's no one more fun to make fun of than Ricky (Chickenshit) Tavy. But even he gets boring rather quickly.
Actually you're right this should be consigned yo the war zone.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Could be any number up to 40000 people. How is anyone to know for sure?
Have you read Rule #1 here? I suggest you do. You do realize that most of these forums today are set up to exchange information on people like you and enforce a virtual global ban on you, right Pimp?
I think we can see for ourselves, mainly a bunch of cock-gobbling arse badgers.Yeah, yeah. I'm leaving soon. By nice to Communist Dan. You understand he's "challenged". Anyway, did you inform the forum owners as to why you wore out your welcome?
Have they always been arseholes?
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Click here to learn more about voter caging.
Click here to learn more about ballot security programs.
Related Court Documents
2016
Order Denying Request to Extend Decree*(11/05/2016)
RNC's Memorandum in Opposition to Order to Show Cause*(10/31/2016)
DNC's Memorandum in Support of Order to Show Cause*(10/26/2016)
2012
Petition for Rehearing (03/22/2012)
Third Circuit Opinion (03/08/2012)
2009
Debevoise Order*(12/01/2009)
Debevoise Opinion*(12/01/2009)
RNC Post-Hearing Brief*(06/26/2009)
DNC Post-Hearing Brief (06/26/2009)
RNC Reply Brief*(02/19/2009)
DNC Brief Opposing Motion to Vacate*(01/19/2009)
RNC Brief in Support of Motion*(11/03/2008)
2008 (several states)
DNC Brief (11/03/2008)
DNC Brief Atty. Certification of Exhibits (11/03/2008)
OFA Intervention Memo (11/03/2008)
Minute Entry (11/03/2008)
2004 (Ohio)
Malone Dismissal*(02/03/2005)
Malone en banc Decision*(11/09/2004)
Malone Appellate Decision*(11/01/2004)
Malone Order*(11/01/2004)
Malone Intervenor PI brief*(11/01/2004)
Malone Intervenor Complaint*(10/31/2004)
Malone Memo in Support of Intervention*(10/28/2004)
Malone Motion to Intervene*(10/28/2004)
2004 (South Dakota)
Daschle Temporary Restraining Order*(11/02/2004)
Daschle SD Complaint*(11/01/2004)
2002 (New Jersey)
Order (10/31/2002)
1990 (North Carolina)
Order (11/05/1990)
1987 (several states)
Consent Decree (07/27/1987)
Original 1981 case (New Jersey)
Consent Decree*(11/01/1982)
Complaint*(02/11/1982)
*
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-...consent-decree
https://www.brennancenter.org/legal-work/dnc-v-rnc-consent-decree
DNC v. RNC Consent Decree
November 5, 2016
In 1982, after caging in predominantly African-American and Latino neighborhoods, the Republican National Committee and New Jersey Republican State Committee entered into a consent decree with their Democratic party counterparts. Under that decree and its 1987 successor, the Republican party organizations agreed to allow a federal court to review proposed “ballot security” programs, including any proposed voter caging.
The consent decree has been invoked several times, by the parties to the decree and by others. In late 2008, the Democratic National Committee and Obama for America sought to enforce the consent decree, claiming that the RNC had not submitted alleged ballot security operations for review. After the election, the RNC asked the federal court to vacate or substantially modify the decree. The court denied the RNC's motion to vacate the consent decree and ordered the decree remain in effect until December 2017. The RNC then appealed to the Third Circuit, which unanimously rejected the appeal and affirmed the District Court's decision. *A subsequent petition for rehearing en banc by the full Third Circuit, and a certiorari petition to U.S. Supreme Court, were denied.
On October 26, 2016, the DNC filed a motion asking that the court find the RNC had violated the decree.*On November 5, after abbreviated discovery, the district court denied the DNC’s request, ruling that the DNC had not provided sufficient evidence of coordination between the Trump campaign and the RNC on ballot-security operations, but will allow the DNC to offer further evidence after the election.
No you're right I am thinking of Marilyn Monroe who was reputed to have an IQ of 168. Jayne Mansfield still had bigger tits though and could speak five languages.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Have they always been arseholes?
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
I think we can see for ourselves, mainly a bunch of cock-gobbling arse badgers.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
Did you morons read Rule #1 on here when you arrived, OldeNazi? I'll bet you didn't. Otherwise you could not have agreed to the terms and conditions.
I think we can see for ourselves, mainly a bunch of cock-gobbling arse badgers.
Sent from my iPhone 25S with cherries on top
This is the board loony well at least until the USMB Cuckoos arrived. She has banged on about the same shit for the last fucking decade at least. In a nutshell; Austrian school , no maths, short bus, cheating by the GOP, weasel jizz, spitting at black drug dealers and posting shit from Wiki.I've only made 8 posts here, boy. Give me a break.