Uh huh. You said he threatened to kick the Russians out of their base. You are as clumsy in your dishonesty as is the trump you fluff as party of your duty as a Putin bot.
are you illiterate?
In 2008 the Ukrainians said they would not renew the lease when it expired in 2017.
is not a non-enewall the same as kicking them out?
Wounded, you resort again to parroting Putin propaganda. Did you learn to cite opinions as support for assertions of fact at Jezooit Skool? Inside joke, don't worry about it.
foreign policy is not a "Putin Propaganda" mag. If I had cited RT youmight have a point.
I didn't -you don't
Yeah, the "chief architect" depends on whether you are doing hysterical Hillary bashing or squawking about Obama "leading from behind." I do understand your use of an irrelevant deflection, however clumsy it was.
Hillary Clinton,‘Smart Power’ and a Dictator’s Fall
The president was wary.
The secretary of state was persuasive. But the ouster of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi left Libya a failed state and a terrorist haven.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/28/us/politics/hillary-clinton-libya.html?_r=0
your ignorance of Hillary role in the world organization of Libyan war 2011 is easily solved by reading this NYTimes piece above.
I can also provide you with her own State Dept memo
https://foia.state.gov/searchapp/DOCUMENTS/HRC_Email_1_296/HRCH1/DOC_0C05739752/C05739752.pdf
From: Jake Sullivan
Sant: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:40 PM
To: Mills, Cheryl D; Nuiand, Victoria J
Subject: tidc todc on libya
this is basically off the top of my head, with a few consultations of my notes. but it shows
S'Clinton
leadership/ownership/stewardship of this country's libya policy from start to finish, let me know what you
think. toria, who else might be able to add to this?
Secretary Clinton's leadership on Libya
HRC has been a
critical voice on Libya in administration deliberations, at NATO, and in contact group
meetings — as well as the public face of the U.S. effort in Libya.
She was instrumental in securing the
authorization, building the coalition, and tightening the noose around Qadhafi and his regime.
This is the third time you have tried to Coulter a citation to support your dishonest assertion. From this link: "The alleged conversation ..." "Alleged," twit.
it was an intercept conversation. It's common knowledge it happened.
Read the transcript -it's a long call,and the F he EU fits right in context.
Only a
Clintonista would call it a Coulter citation.
You have parroted opinions by those who tell you what you think. Owl'd pointed out that your "research" on the matter consists of nothing more than parroting propaganda. You have Coultered citations to pretend a suspect tape from a vague and biased source is truth. You claimed the Ukrainian leader had threatened to close the Russian base by pointing to him threatening to block one ship. Now, you treat me as Deplorably stupid by claiming a negotiation tactic that never amounted to anything, that allowed continued use of the port somehow validates your Putin master using the threat of military force to annex the property of a sovereign nation, even boasting the extortion was pulled off "without firing a shot."
The only good thing to come out of all of you being Putin's lickspittle is the way it inspired other Deplorables to put the phoniness of their "patriotism" in neon.
owls research only shows that NATO encirclement was more of an agrevating factor then I had thought.
It makes Putin's Russia-Geogian war even more reasonable in terms of resisting strategic encirclement .
Once again you fail to read that the Orange Revolution government had threatened closure ( non-renewal)
You are so lacking in basic foreign affairs understanding you challenge me on common ordinary knowledge
like the threatened non-renewall / F the EU call/ and the strategic importance of Sevastopol.
You don't even understand Libya's "smart power " advocacy by Clinton was interventionism on the cheap disguised as "Kinetic military action."
You arent stupid. ergo it must be you are a hopeless Democratic partisan who refuses to anything but the party line. IOW's a further waste of my time
