Come on:
The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances refers to three identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary on 5 December 1994, providing security assurances by its signatories relating to Belarus's, Kazakhstan's and Ukraine's accession to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. The memorandum was originally signed by three nuclear powers, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, and the United Kingdom. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.[1]
The memorandum included security assurances against threats or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan.
In my understanding, that were Ukraine, Belarus and Kazakhstan giving up the nukes on their territory in exchange for assurances for their territorial integrity. And yes, the U.S. was a signatory, and very much instrumental in bringing the memorandum about.
Yup, problem is "We" anatta only brought up the Budapest memorandum AFTER the Minsk Protocol he denies mentioning at all blew up in his face and AFTER he talked of "we" organizing Russia after the fall of communism. He did "Budapest" after that, in a dishonest pretense that was what he had been talking about all along.
And, the Budapest memorandum has nothing to do with Russia's internal organization that Anatta referred to as a "we" participant in what Russia did regarding its own sovereignty. Look back more carefully