Waterboarding is NOT torture!

Southern Man said:
Those are good points, but they all point to the likely possibility that Syria got rid of them. It does not dispute the fact that Saddam sent them over there, whether Syria wanted them or not. I’ve never accused the Syrians of being insane as Saddam was. Any sane leader would understand that having and using WMDs against a western power would be suicidal.
Click to expand...

Why don't you provide some proof that Hussein sent his weapons to Syria.
 
I do believe...........

blackascoal said:
Stupid.

When our soldiers were waterboarded it was torture then and it's torture now.

Only a terrorist would use it.
Click to expand...


Their heads and private parts were removed...big difference...why don't you attack the terrorists instead of the troops?
 
LOL @ BB.
That is pretty good you are taking the word of sadams #2 guy over our own intelligence data. remember how screwball ? helped get us into this mess. will some never learn ?

how unamerican.
 
I dobelieve Saddams#2 would know..........

uscitizen said:
LOL @ BB.
That is pretty good you are taking the word of sadams #2 guy over our own intelligence data. remember how screwball ? helped get us into this mess. will some never learn ?

how unamerican.
Click to expand...


More than you Liberals and our Intell also...by the way the article was published by a liberal slant paper...go figure...!:rolleyes:
 
Battleborne said:
Start here elBeefy...;)


www.nysun.com/article/26514
Click to expand...

Thats a weak report based on hearsay of a Bush loving Iraqi Christian. When the CIA is quoted, this is what they say:

From your article:

The CIA's Iraq Survey Group acknowledged in its September 30, 2004, "Comprehensive Report," "we cannot express a firm view on the possibility that WMD elements were relocated out of Iraq prior to the war. Reports of such actions exist, but we have not yet been able to investigate this possibility thoroughly."
Click to expand...

Now what about these articles?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/25/AR2005042501554.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6834079/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4484237.stm

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/04/26/iraq.main/index.html

Don't you think that if there was even the slightest reason to believe these phantom WMD had been shipped to Syria in the stupidest tactical decision of all time, that the Bush Administration would have launched an all out full scale investigation, and at least found an ounce of real evidence to back it up? Instead, you believe Bush would rather have egg on his face this whole time, for all these years?

Man, you guys will believe anything.
 
Some things are...........

Beefy said:
Thats a weak report based on hearsay of a Bush loving Iraqi Christian. When the CIA is quoted, this is what they say:

From your article:



Now what about these articles?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/25/AR2005042501554.html

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6834079/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4484237.stm

http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/04/26/iraq.main/index.html

Don't you think that if there was even the slightest reason to believe these phantom WMD had been shipped to Syria in the stupidest tactical decision of all time, that the Bush Administration would have launched an all out full scale investigation, and at least found an ounce of real evidence to back it up? Instead, you believe Bush would rather have egg on his face this whole time, for all these years?

Man, you guys will believe anything.
Click to expand...



best left unsaid...'for your eyes only applies'...your eyes have no need to know...elBeefy!;)


and by the way...your avatar looks strangely like the 'bad Kahuna' that thru the todler over the bridge into oncoming traffic in Hawaii!
 
Last edited:
Beefy said:
.....[1] When the CIA is quoted, this is what they say:

.....

[2] Don't you think that if there was even the slightest reason to believe these phantom WMD had been shipped to Syria in the stupidest tactical decision of all time.....
Click to expand...

1. Typical CIA wishy-washy. Similar language was used prior to 9-11.
2. Saddam was insane, so your assessment of his "tactical decision" is moot. He sent his best fighter jets to his worst enemy, Iran, at the start of GW1.
 
Battleborne said:
best left unsaid...'for your eyes only applies'...your eyes have no need to know...elBeefy!;)


and by the way...your avatar looks strangely like the 'bad Kahuna' that thru the todler over the bridge into oncoming traffic in Hawaii!
Click to expand...

No, that guy is nuts. My avatar is that of a peace loving, highly talented and gentle man - Bruddah Iz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Kamakawiwo'ole

Southern Man said:
1. Typical CIA wishy-washy. Similar language was used prior to 9-11.
2. Saddam was insane, so your assessment of his "tactical decision" is moot. He sent his best fighter jets to his worst enemy, Iran, at the start of GW1.
Click to expand...

SM, don't you think Bush would have wanted to find out, in a very big way? Or is he insane too?
 
Beefy said:
....



SM, don't you think Bush would have wanted to find out, in a very big way? Or is he insane too?
Click to expand...
Why, would you have believed him?

You seem to forget that Bush 43 has been involved in Presidential politics for 19 years now; first with his Dad as veep, then with his Dad as Prez, now directly. Reagan tried to make nice to Democrats, so did Bush 41, and so did Bush 43 in his first term. I'm sure he's as mistrusting and sick of Democrats as anyone right about now, and could care less if he "proves" something that is fairly obvious, as well as inconsequential at the present time.

When you have a large percentage of people who think that the WTC was an inside job, and that "Bush lied" to get us into a crappy war with Iran, then there's not much point in trying to prove the obvious anymore.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top