How stupid, this is idiocy and a generalization. You obviously don’t know any LBGT people.
What kind of "Christian values" do Conservatives want?
- Thread starter StoneByStone
- Start date
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Not at all. When it comes to my intentions, I'm the only expert on the matter. We have to go with what I say they are.
I insult and mock people to express their idiocy. I could go on for days with you. You believe in every WACKY, logically contradictory concept that your slavemasters tell you to believe. That is not somehow my fault for pointing it out.
Nice try though.
Nope. In 100% of the cases, leftists initiate the petty ad hominem. When I respond with observations of lacking education and of lacking cognitive proficiency, I get the same drivel that you are spewing right now.
So, let's apply your logic and ask you why you like to start fights with strangers. Yes, lets.
StoneByStone, why do you like to start fights with strangers?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
How stupid. Do you often make random, inaccurate guesses? I bet you learned long ago that you in particular should not bet on sports.
I know PLENTY of LGBTQIATIOAPP ... well, not so many of the IATIOAPP but plenty of the others. Yes, they bitch all the fucking time. Bitch, bitch, bitch ... about how they are VICTIMS.
You clearly don't know any.
Liar, you don’t know any of this is your opinion of them.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
This is not accurate. You are correct that something abnormal but completely natural occurs in the development of a homosexual (zygote, embryo, fetus ...) that affects the brain and causes attraction to the same gender in the same way that you are attracted to the opposite gender. The homosexual never got any more choice in the matter than you did.
This is not accurate. Homosexuals can and do procreate just fine with members of the opposite gender. Their children will likely be straight because, as you noted, there is no "homosexual" gene.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You are in denial. Let's reengage after you wake up.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
This sounds like an admission that homosexuality is a choice. I humbly accept that concession.
Can a homosexual man procreate with another homosexual man?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
No, it is not. You are conflating homosexuality with a decision to have sex.
A man does not choose to be homosexual any more than a man chooses to be 7'2" in height, but his decision to engage in sex or to play in the NBA is a choice.
Nope. Only (biological) man+ (biological) woman can procreate. Homosexuality is irrelevant.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
you are 100% wrong
IBDaMann
Well-known member
You think people choose their height?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
It's actually very healthy if you do it the right way. But like I said, it's hard to do it the right way. And no, I understand that most people aren't vegan either because they don't understand the benefits or because it's too difficult.
I own a car and use it when biking just isn't possible.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Do you do that IRL? If someone says something that you think is wrong, are you rude to them?
Have I ever resorted to Ad Homs with you? Have I ever sperged out and started name-calling?
I think what's happening here is that you've turned your ideas into your identity. So now when people debunk your ideas, you take it as a personal attack.
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Do you have any way of proving that this is true?
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Homosexuality and bisexuality are also very common in animals. Do you think they're choosing this too?
Science hasn't found a gay gene, but it has found that same-sex attraction is caused by genetic factors. So if you want to use the science argument here, you have to accept that it's not a choice.
But how is that harmful to individuals or society? Has recognizing gay marriage made the world a worse place because homosexuals can't procreate?
Should infertile couples also be regarded as abnormal and not have their marriages recognized?
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
It's actually very healthy if you do it the right way. But like I said, it's hard to do it the right way. And no, I understand that most people aren't vegan either because they don't understand the benefits or because it's too difficult.
I own a car and use it when biking just isn't possible.
So you haven't given up a car. You are still polluting.
Doesn't sound like you have really sacrificed for Mother Erf. Just another talk a lot but do nothing leftist
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
Doesn't sound like you have really sacrificed for Mother Erf. Just another talk a lot but do nothing leftist[/QUOTE]
I'm doing what I can. Giving up EVERYTHING that harms the environment is impractical.
canceled.2021.3
Former Vice President
Yes gay marriage has harmed society. It redefines marriage which of course marxists like yourself want to do. That is the real end game, cloaked in "equality". Your last question is laughable
Marxism knows that the biggest threat to collectivism is
1) The nuclear family
2) Religion
3) Private property rights
Is it any wonder that those three things have been under assault by leftists like yourself for decades? It is how you destroyed the black community
StoneByStone
It's OK to Be White
So I won't bother explaining how I'm not a Marxist, because nobody here actually believes that. And no, Marxists don't want to destroy the nuclear family.
Society has always redefined marriage. At one point, it was common for the local king to be able to have sex with your wife if he wanted. For a long time, it was common for husbands to have multiple wives. Then it was one wife, but concubines on the side until the Catholic Church changed its mind and decided that was wrong.
Redefining marriage hasn't always been a bad thing. So instead of saying that same-sex marriage redefines marriage, explain why the way it redefines marriage is bad for society.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Do you have any way of proving it's not?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Yes we do because you are a Marxist, specifically a socialist. In your futile attempt to hide that fact, you absurdly deny that NAZI Germany was socialist. Unbelievable.
Yes they do. Try reading the Communist Manifesto. Marx' underlying assumption is that parents don't love their children and only seek to exploit them through forced labor until the day they die, ergo Marx demands that the State forcibly remove children from the home and from their parents, where the official State indoctrination is to be incorporated into the children's continuing government-controlled and monitored education until their labor can be exploited by the State instead of by their parents.
Read it.
Really? Name one such redefinition in the 1700's.
Yes, it's good to be king ... except that is not a redefinition of marriage.
Marriage has always been a public announcement that a particular woman belongs to a particular man. That does not differ between polygamy and monogamy.
.