What? They make it this easy? Is this covered by the ACA?

evince said:
but paying for your Viagra is just fine huh?


how about we pay for nothing that has to do with YOUR dick.

your dick causes pregnancy.



maybe we should start right where the problem begins.

with YOUR dick.


get it.


what is in my body and would turn into a lump of rotting cells if you took it out of my body is part of my flesh .

GET IT!


It is my flesh and you don't have a right to decide WHAT I or any woman does with the very flesh inside our bodies.


Not until you willing to cut your dicks off to prevent what you claim is such a horrible crime.


start a protest to protect these babies by cutting your dicks off.

that should save a lot of abortions from happening huh?

You see that flesh belongs to you.

quite trying to DIG inside the bodies of women and fix your end of it mmmkay
Click to expand...

"Dick" just rolls off your tongue; HUH!!
 
christiefan915 said:
Are you sure about the no contest thing?
Click to expand...

Paula Corbin Jones (born Paula Rosalee Corbin; September 17, 1966) is a former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. Clinton entered into an out-of-court settlement, agreeing to pay Jones and her attorneys a total of $850,000, before the lawsuit was dismissed pre-trial on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate damages.
The Paula Jones case precipitated Clinton's impeachment. Charges of perjury and obstruction of justice were brought against Clinton based on statements he made during the depositions for the Jones lawsuit. The specific statements were about the nature of his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, with whom he denied having a sexual relationship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones
 
Jarod said:
Soo, you don't have a citation?
Click to expand...

Paula Corbin Jones (born Paula Rosalee Corbin; September 17, 1966) is a former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. Clinton entered into an out-of-court settlement, agreeing to pay Jones and her attorneys a total of $850,000, before the lawsuit was dismissed pre-trial on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate damages.
The Paula Jones case precipitated Clinton's impeachment. Charges of perjury and obstruction of justice were brought against Clinton based on statements he made during the depositions for the Jones lawsuit. The specific statements were about the nature of his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, with whom he denied having a sexual relationship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones
 
NOW Won't Support
Jones Appeal
WASHINGTON (April 22) - Declaring its national board and local chapters overwhelmingly against it, the National Organization for Women said today it will not file legal papers on behalf of Paula Jones in her sexual harassment lawsuit against President Clinton.
NOW President Patricia Ireland told a news conference the women's group believes such a ''highly charged political'' lawsuit should not be used as a test case for stopping sexual harassment in the workplace.
Ms. Ireland also said her group ''decided not to work with the disreputable right-wing organizations and individuals advancing her cause, who themselves have a long-standing political interest in undermining our movement to strengthen women's rights and weakening the laws that protect those rights.''
NOW did not poll its membership, Ms. Ireland said, but it was clear from contacts with about 500 chapters around the country that the local groups opposed filing a friend-of-the-court brief, by margins of at least 8-to-1 and possibly 10-to-1.
http://www.gargaro.com/nowappeal.html
 
Classic Liberal said:
Paula Corbin Jones (born Paula Rosalee Corbin; September 17, 1966) is a former Arkansas state employee who sued U.S. President Bill Clinton for sexual harassment. Clinton entered into an out-of-court settlement, agreeing to pay Jones and her attorneys a total of $850,000, before the lawsuit was dismissed pre-trial on the grounds that Jones failed to demonstrate damages.
The Paula Jones case precipitated Clinton's impeachment. Charges of perjury and obstruction of justice were brought against Clinton based on statements he made during the depositions for the Jones lawsuit. The specific statements were about the nature of his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky, with whom he denied having a sexual relationship.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Jones
Click to expand...

Where does that say he violated a law that he signed?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
because 23 week olds are so much more human beings than 22 week olds.....
Click to expand...

No, because after 16 weeks, I believe a woman has had plenty of time to make up her mind and that is around the time the States right to Protect life begins to surpass the right of a woman to make her own medical decisions.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe this is the issue at hand. You ask for an evidence link otherwise.

Jarod said:
I don't know of any hypocritical stances of the left on woman's issues?
Click to expand...

You denied all evidence because you're a political leftist partisan.

You want more hypocrisy? Here's more,



The feminist movement has been called to judge whether President Clinton is worthy of its allegiance. These are not the first Clinton supporters to feel squeezed between their principles and an alliance with the President. Welfare advocates and environmentalists have faced similar conflicts.
But the feminist response to the women accusing the President has posed with special sharpness the question of philosophical sellout. Some of the most vocal advocates on women's issues have been accused of having a double standard for Mr. Clinton. Within feminist circles there has been obvious reluctance to denounce the President or support his accusers, given his sworn denials and the fact that his political opponents also oppose a liberal agenda on women's rights.
But the public and the media expect feminists to be militant about sexual misconduct, whether or not any law is violated. The hypocrisy charge is sticking because some feminist leaders are making distinctions between Mr. Clinton's behavior and past accusations of sexual harassment against Justice Clarence Thomas and former Senator Bob Packwood. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/24/opinion/law-in-the-clinton-era-a-feminist-dilemma.html
 
Classic Liberal said:
Correct me if I'm wrong but I do believe this is the issue at hand. You ask for an evidence link otherwise.



You denied all evidence because you're a political leftist partisan.

You want more hypocrisy? Here's more,



The feminist movement has been called to judge whether President Clinton is worthy of its allegiance. These are not the first Clinton supporters to feel squeezed between their principles and an alliance with the President. Welfare advocates and environmentalists have faced similar conflicts.
But the feminist response to the women accusing the President has posed with special sharpness the question of philosophical sellout. Some of the most vocal advocates on women's issues have been accused of having a double standard for Mr. Clinton. Within feminist circles there has been obvious reluctance to denounce the President or support his accusers, given his sworn denials and the fact that his political opponents also oppose a liberal agenda on women's rights.
But the public and the media expect feminists to be militant about sexual misconduct, whether or not any law is violated. The hypocrisy charge is sticking because some feminist leaders are making distinctions between Mr. Clinton's behavior and past accusations of sexual harassment against Justice Clarence Thomas and former Senator Bob Packwood. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/03/24/opinion/law-in-the-clinton-era-a-feminist-dilemma.html
Click to expand...

The way I understand it, and I have not reviewed the facts in many years. Paula Jones was not a victim of sexual harassment. Bill Clinton was alleged to have come on to her, that's all. That in and of itself is not sexual harassment. Monica Lewinski was also not a victim of sexual harassment, she had a consensual affair with him , which according to her testimony she perused.

So are you confused about the facts or what constitutes sexual harassment?
 
Clinton obstructed justice and lied to a grand jury. He broke his oath as President and should have resigned. That's what a man would do if he loved his country and the Constitution.
 
Jarod said:
No, because after 16 weeks, I believe a woman has had plenty of time to make up her mind and that is around the time the States right to Protect life begins to surpass the right of a woman to make her own medical decisions.
Click to expand...

could she make up her mind in 12?......in 6?......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top