Why don't you Libtard/ Progressives/ Democrats just say it?

WinterBorn said:
Since my posts are not aimed to insult, these personal attacks on me can only mean I have soundly proven my points and the people who disagree have no real debate points left.

My work here is done. lol
Click to expand...

Don't let the door hit'cha' where the dear lord went an' splitcha'.....!


Oh and.....


Adios!
 
Eastwood's characters tend to be the loner who takes on the powerful and corrupt when lesser men look the other way. In spite of seemingly long odds he triumphs, but the outcome was never in doubt. He wins the admiration of fine women. :)
 
Southern Man said:
Eastwood's characters tend to be the loner who takes on the powerful and corrupt when lesser men look the other way. In spite of seemingly long odds he triumphs, but the outcome was never in doubt. He wins the admiration of fine women. :)
Click to expand...

And you are one the guys protecting the powerful and corrupt as tradition.
 
WinterBorn said:
Awww, she picked up SM's favorite hobby. Isn't that sweet.


Pssst, just a piece of friendly info, SM hates oral sex. ;) :cof1:
Click to expand...

That last statement has no merit.
He has never said he hates it or even if he's tried it.
He's just said he's against it.

I can probably say and am probably correct, that he's never tried the Venus Butterfly method.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
That last statement has no merit.
He has never said he hates it or even if he's tried it.
He's just said he's against it.

I can probably say and am probably correct, that he's never tried the Venus Butterfly method.
Click to expand...

I stand corrected.
 
Southern Man said:
That was nasty, even for you. You should apologize to her. :pke:
Click to expand...

She seems to be overly fond of you, so I thought I should warn her. Besides, I was shown to be inaccurate in what I said and admitted as much.

And considering the number of times you have told your opponents in these debates to get a room or something similar, I cannot see you taking any moral high ground.
 
Chivalry is dead, apparently, at least with queer enablers. Again, lack of morality shows unintended consequences. *shrug*
 
Southern Man said:
Chivalry is dead, apparently, at least with queer enablers. Again, lack of morality shows unintended consequences. *shrug*
Click to expand...

Oh, so your comment that Soc and I should get a room was moral, and my comment that you dislike oral sex was not?

Again your standards defy logic.
 
RStringfield said:
I don't know why they changed it. But it is clear that the science does not support the idea that it is a disorder.
Click to expand...

The factors that determined the decision of the APA to delete homosexuality from DSM-II were summarized as follows:

1. Gay activists had a profound influence on psychiatric thinking.
2. A sincere belief was held by liberal-minded and compassionate psychiatrists that listing homosexuality as a psychiatric disorder supported and reinforced prejudice against homosexuals. Removal of the term from the diagnostic manual was viewed as a humane, progressive act.
3. There was an acceptance of new criteria to define psychiatric conditions. Only those disorders that caused a patient to suffer or that resulted in adjustment problems were thought to be appropriate for inclusion in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.
Click to expand...
http://www.narth.com/docs/normalization.html

*preps for Solitary's attack on NARTH*
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top