Why Should Anyone Believe in Global Warming?

IBDaMann said:
Of course there is. I make that determination. I'm the one to whom you asked the question. I'm the one who specifies the clarification that is needed.


I make that determination. Yes, I need my questions answered.

Your argument remains dismissed.
Click to expand...

Questions should be answered in the order asked.

Regardless of how I answered either of your questions, the answer to my questions would be the same.

You're avoiding and deflecting.... because you don't want to answer my question.

You keep saying my argument is dismissed, but I'm only asking a simple question, not making an argument.
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
Questions should be answered in the order asked.
Click to expand...
Yup, so you can start with his first "this needs clarification" question and then you can move on from there.

ZenMode said:
Regardless of how I answered either of your questions, the answer to my questions would be the same.

You're avoiding and deflecting.... because you don't want to answer my question.

You keep saying my argument is dismissed, but I'm only asking a simple question, not making an argument.
Click to expand...
:blah::blah::blah:
 
Into the Night said:
You never asked a question, Sock.
Click to expand...

Question 1

Question 1...asked again

You acknowledging the question you now claim I didn't ask :laugh::laugh:

giphy.gif


giphy.gif
 
Into the Night said:
You aren't asking any questions, Sock. You have to define your terms to ask a question.
Click to expand...

You can pretend to be baffled by my apparently complex and/or cryptic terms like "health" and "pain", that are probably understood by 90% of elementary school children, but I'm not buying it. It's all part of the overall plan to avoid answering questions to keep confirmation bias (and intellectual dishonesty) alive!
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
You can pretend to be baffled by my apparently complex and/or cryptic terms like "health" and "pain", that are probably understood by 90% of elementary school children, but I'm not buying it. It's all part of the overall plan to avoid answering questions to keep confirmation bias (and intellectual dishonesty) alive!
Click to expand...

Buzzword fallacies. You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. Making up numbers and using them as 'data' is also a fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.

You have to define your terms to ask a question, Sock.
 
Into the Night said:
Buzzword fallacies. You don't get to speak for everyone. You only get to speak for you. Omniscience fallacy. Making up numbers and using them as 'data' is also a fallacy. Argument from randU fallacy.

You have to define your terms to ask a question, Sock.
Click to expand...

Yep. I fully expect you and IBDaMann to ride the "we're confused by your fancy terms" train indefinitely, that way you can never answer 3 incredibly basic questions.

be68baf9-4930-40bc-b97e-d32699b967fd_text.gif
 
Into the Night said:
You have not defined any terms. You are not asking any question. Void argument fallacy.
Click to expand...

I've asked 3 incredibly simple questions. You are choosing to play dumb to avoid answer them and hiding behind faux confusion about terms as the excuse. That's all that is happening here.
 
ZenMode said:
I've asked 3 incredibly simple questions. You are choosing to play dumb to avoid answer them and hiding behind faux confusion about terms as the excuse. That's all that is happening here.
Click to expand...

You have not defined any terms. You are not asking any question. Void argument fallacy.
 
Into the Night said:
You have not defined any terms. You are not asking any question. Void argument fallacy.
Click to expand...

:laugh::laugh: The running, tap dancing and evading continues....

We both have enough of an understanding of "health" to know that there are differences between people and to know that health can change in the short term and long term. However, I can't make you not play dumb any more than I can make someone with Autism not have Autism.

Enjoy your dishonesty.
 
ZenMode said:
:laugh::laugh: The running, tap dancing and evading continues....

We both have enough of an understanding of "health" to know that there are differences between people and to know that health can change in the short term and long term. However, I can't make you not play dumb any more than I can make someone with Autism not have Autism.

Enjoy your dishonesty.
Click to expand...
You are describing yourself again.
Health cannot change. It has no value that can 'change'. Unit error. Void unit.

Climate cannot change either. Same thing. There is no such thing as a global climate either.
 
Into the Night said:
You are describing yourself again.
Health cannot change. It has no value that can 'change'. Unit error. Void unit.

Climate cannot change either. Same thing. There is no such thing as a global climate either.
Click to expand...

Right, so you expect to be equally healthy in your 90's as you were in your 20's, right?

Or, as I've described earlier, a disease free, injury free, issue free athlete in their 20's is as healthy as a person with terminal cancer, in hospice, minutes from dying, right?


(This is where you pretend to be baffled by the concept of health... or pain.... or any of the many concepts that educated people understand.)
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
Right, so you expect to be equally healthy in your 90's as you were in your 20's, right?

Or, as I've described earlier, a disease free, injury free, issue free athlete in their 20's is as healthy as a person with terminal cancer, in hospice, minutes from dying, right?


(This is where you pretend to be baffled by the concept of health... or pain.... or any of the many concepts that educated people understand.)
Click to expand...

No equation. False comparative. There is no equals sign in 'health'. There is no other comparative sign in health. There is no value associated with 'health'. Health is a subjective term. It cannot change.


You seem unable to understand the difference between subjective and objective. Your inability to read and understand English is quite pronounced.
 
Into the Night said:
No equation. False comparative. There is no equals sign in 'health'. There is no other comparative sign in health. There is no value associated with 'health'. Health is a subjective term. It cannot change.


You seem unable to understand the difference between subjective and objective. Your inability to read and understand English is quite pronounced.
Click to expand...

Is having terminal cancer vs being cancer free subjective or objective?
 
Into the Night said:
Cancer is not health. False equivalence fallacy.
Click to expand...

I didn't ask if cancer was health. I asked If having terminal cancer vs being cancer free is subjective or objective?

(PRO TIP: Now is when you start posting "RQAA", even though you haven't answered my question)
 
Last edited:
ZenMode said:
I didn't ask if cancer was health. I asked If having terminal cancer vs being cancer free is subjective or objective?

(PRO TIP: Now is when you start posting "RQAA", even though you haven't answered my question)
Click to expand...

You equated cancer with health. That's a false equivalence, Sock. RQAA. Stop repeating your question. I've answered it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top