Why Should Anyone Believe in Global Warming?

Into the Night said:
So you are trying to create energy out of nothing again. You are currently back to argument 2a and ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics again.
Click to expand...

Nobody is trying to create energy out of nothing.

Atmosphere and the magnetic field are what keep Earth from overheating.

Imagine what happens if you bake pizza in a 1000 degree oven.
 
IBDaMann said:
You haven't asked a single correct question. More importantly, you haven't made a single point. You are gibbering, mostly as a result of your inability to read.
Click to expand...

Good lord you still don't get that I understand your point? Your question about the pizza has an obvious answer... the pizza's temperature will stop increasing when it reaches eqilibrium.
 
IBDaMann said:
Wrong question, again.

Correct question: When you turn on an oven, i.e. adding new thermal energy, where inside the oven does the temperature decrease?
Click to expand...

This is assuming, of course, that fuel is being consumed to heat the oven, either at the power plant, or natural gas or propane being fed to the oven.

If you have an electric oven and the power is out, turning on the oven will do you no good. Nothing happens.

The oven will not get hotter and hotter either. It will reach a set temperature and then stop getting warmer. Ovens have thermostats in them. That way the pizza you cook at 425 won't turn to ashes because the oven reached 1000 degrees.
 
AProudLefty said:
You claim to be an expert in thermodynamics
Click to expand...
I'm going to ask for a link to where I made this claim.

AProudLefty said:
... it should be easy for you to answer.
Click to expand...
It would be trivial for me to answer that particular question correctly. You, however, are meeting with extreme difficulty over the easiest and simplest of questions. One has to wonder why you aren't taking notes on everything I teach you.
 
IBDaMann said:
I'm going to ask for a link to where I made this claim.


It would be trivial for me to answer that particular question correctly. You, however, are meeting with extreme difficulty over the easiest and simplest of questions. One has to wonder why you aren't taking notes on everything I teach you.
Click to expand...

You have taught that you know nothing about thermodynamics.
 
Perhaps this illustration will be good at explaining.

If you had an oven outside in the freezing weather and you try to cook a pizza in it with the door open, it wouldn't be hot but warm, depending on the temperatures. Now if you closed the door, it would get hotter and hotter.
 
AProudLefty said:
Thank you for answering finally!!! So the temperature of the pizza will increase.

I'm so happy we're making progress!
Click to expand...
No progress is being made. You're simply adopting the same Church of Global Warming "lie of omission" strategy detailed in post #544. It'll fail you just as it failed ZenMode.
 
AProudLefty said:
Define climate.
Click to expand...
You should already be aware of how stupid it is for you to ask me to define Climate. Anyway, let's go:

Climate (proper noun)

Climate is the Democratic People's goddess and one of the main deities of the Climate Change pantheon. Born out of the Scientific Consensus, She oversees the central planning and administration of all weather, ecosystems, and local climates across the globe, as well as all interactions thereof. Climate is believed to be responsible for the care and well-being of all life on earth. In other faiths She is called Gaia, Durga, Mother Nature, et. al.

kNHxbULAdDwtVtHHYcAa.png


Note: Climate, by her nature, never changes but she is believed to be constantly changing, thus forming the grand mystery of the Global Warming doctrine. This is a core tenet of Settled Science catechism.



Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.
 
gfm7175 said:
No progress is being made. You're simply adopting the same Church of Global Warming "lie of omission" strategy detailed in post #544. It'll fail you just as it failed ZenMode.
Click to expand...

No. We understand your point. The Sun doesn't increase the overall temperature of the Earth. It remains in a state of equilibrium.

Now go ahead and deny that I understood the point.
 
IBDaMann said:
You should already be aware of how stupid it is for you to ask me to define Climate. Anyway, let's go:

Climate (proper noun)

Climate is the Democratic People's goddess and one of the main deities of the Climate Change pantheon. Born out of the Scientific Consensus, She oversees the central planning and administration of all weather, ecosystems, and local climates across the globe, as well as all interactions thereof. Climate is believed to be responsible for the care and well-being of all life on earth. In other faiths She is called Gaia, Durga, Mother Nature, et. al.

kNHxbULAdDwtVtHHYcAa.png


Note: Climate, by her nature, never changes but she is believed to be constantly changing, thus forming the grand mystery of the Global Warming doctrine. This is a core tenet of Settled Science catechism.



Don't be afraid to come to me with the hard stuff.
Click to expand...

Not your made up definition, dumbass.

Define climate please, not the mumbo-jumbo you just spew.
 
Into the Night said:
You already do. You don't have to declare you do. Illiteracy: proper nouns are capitalized.

That's rich. Congratulations. You made to my sig line with that one!
Click to expand...
There is no 'determiner of climate'. You cannot change climate.
Click to expand...
There's no determiner of climate. So, climate just exists and is impacted by nothing? With a straight face you type this nonsense?
There is no such thing as a global climate.
Click to expand...
There isn't a singular global climate,but every square inch of the planet has a measurable climate. If the atmosphere were to vanish, every square inch of the planet would have a dramatically different climate. How do you not thing these things through?
There is no such thing as a global climate. Climate cannot change.
Click to expand...
Yes. Wrong. If the atmosphere were to vanish, the climate would change. If the sun were to explode, the climate of Earth would change dramatically. If the concentration of CO2 were to hit 30%, the climate of the entire planet would change dramatically. Again, do you think these things through?
You are describing yourself again. Inversion fallacy.

Blatant lie.

Paradox. Irrational.

Blatant lie.

Blatant lie. The Sun is not CO2 in the atmosphere.

Trying to dodge your doctrine, eh?

Paradoxes. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
The Earth cannot heat the Sun.
Blatant lies.
Click to expand...

You are being intentionally obtuse. If a blanket over your body is effective in slowing the flow of energy from the body to the colder atmosphere, then your understanding of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is clearly misguided because if you were right, a blanket would do nothing.
 
AProudLefty said:
He claims to be an expert in thermodynamics. If he is, he'd know that the room would arrive in a state of equilibrium and figure out the final temperature of the rock.
Click to expand...

Sybil has mental issues as would anyone who thinks their imaginary "friends" are real people.
 
AProudLefty said:
Good lord you still don't get that I understand your point? Your question about the pizza has an obvious answer... the pizza's temperature will stop increasing when it reaches eqilibrium.
Click to expand...
Your English comprehension sucks. When will the pizza's temperature increase after it reaches equilibrium temperature, assuming the oven settings remain the same?
 
IBDaMann said:
Your English comprehension sucks. When will the pizza's temperature increase after it reaches equilibrium temperature, assuming the oven settings remain the same?
Click to expand...

Go ahead and answer. Should be fun.

Hint: once equilibrium has reached, the temperature will stop rising.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top