Why Should Anyone Believe in Global Warming?

Not your made up definition, dumbass.

Define climate please, not the mumbo-jumbo you just spew.

The mumbo-jumbo is YOURS.

Climate is just a subjective description of conditions. It has no values. It cannot change.

The word 'climate' stems from the Greek 'klima', meaning 'zone' or 'slope'. First appearing in the English lexicon around the 14th century, it has always been a subjective description of conditions (originally meaning a subjective description between two different latitudes, but has since been expanded in to a 'zone'.
 
Last edited:
There's no determiner of climate. So, climate just exists and is impacted by nothing?
That is correct.
With a straight face you type this nonsense?
Yes, because it's not nonsense..
There isn't a singular global climate, but every square inch of the planet has a measurable climate.
Climate is not measured or measurable. Climate has no location.
If the atmosphere were to vanish, every square inch of the planet would have a dramatically different climate.
All climates remain the same. Nothing changes.
How do you not thing these things through?
Try English. It works better.
Yes. Wrong.
Paradox. Irrational.
If the atmosphere were to vanish, the climate would change.
No climate would change.
If the sun were to explode, the climate of Earth would change dramatically.
There is no 'climate of Earth'.
If the concentration of CO2 were to hit 30%, the climate of the entire planet would change dramatically.
There is no such thing as a global climate. Nothing changes.
Why would CO2 in the atmosphere hit 30%?
Again, do you think these things through?
Obviously, YOU don't!
You are being intentionally obtuse.
You are describing yourself again.
If a blanket over your body is effective in slowing the flow of energy from the body to the colder atmosphere, then your understanding of the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics is clearly misguided because if you were right, a blanket would do nothing.
Word stuffing. You are still locked in paradox on this one. Which is it, dude?
 
That is correct.

Yes, because it's not nonsense..

Climate is not measured or measurable. Climate has no location.

All climates remain the same. Nothing changes.

Try English. It works better.

Paradox. Irrational.

No climate would change.

There is no 'climate of Earth'.

There is no such thing as a global climate. Nothing changes.
Why would CO2 in the atmosphere hit 30%?

Obviously, YOU don't!

You are describing yourself again.

Word stuffing. You are still locked in paradox on this one. Which is it, dude?

Define climate.

Also you can trap heat.
 
Earth's core? Yes. I thought about bringing that up previously, but decided against it. There's already enough confusion about fairly simple thermodynamics laws. No need to throw anything else into the equation.

So you write it off because you are already denying the laws of thermodynamics. Fine.
 
See? You persist in the notion that I do not understand your point. The Sun's radiation does not increase, therefore, it does not increase the Earth's temperature (this is a simplistic view).



Again, you persist in that absurd notion that I do not understand. I am aware that the Earth is in a state of equilibrium.

Here's a question for you: what do you think will happen if the Earth doesn't rotate?



If the oven door is open and the CO2 surrounds it like a blanket, it will get hotter with no way of heat escaping.

You cannot trap heat. CO2 is not a blanket. You are still locked in paradox here.
 
Back
Top