Into the Night
Verified User
A beginning hacker in Android, eh? What a loser. You say it took you 28 years to learn this??
I think you just Googled it and made the whole thing up.
Why Should Anyone Believe in Global Warming?
- Thread starter IBDaMann
- Start date
A beginning hacker in Android, eh? What a loser. You say it took you 28 years to learn this??
I think you just Googled it and made the whole thing up.
Into the Night
Verified User
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Nope I do not. I do not take every word by a scientist at face value. I look at papers and determine it.
I do not consider them divine or above me. They are humans just like me and you who seek truths.
It is Y O U who consider yourself above the rest. Your avatar and your sig tell us that much. You are arrogant who considers himself to be correct and without criticism. It is Y O U who consider yourself to be above the rest of the scientists. The rest of studies (in your own word, propaganda) be damned. You are a lost cause that can only be met with pity instead of derision.
Doc Dutch, what are you doing?
The rest is dismissed.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
I am going to finally ask... what is LIF?
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
This is beginning to get tiresome. A total bore.
ZenMode
Well-known member
You really ARE desperate if you have to claim that!
Climate cannot change. You still don't know what climate is.
It is YOU using this nonsense phrase in place of 'global warming'.
It has already been explained to you numerous times. RQAA.
You cannot create energy out of nothing. Earth cannot heat itself
You cannot trap heat. You cannot slow heat. You still don't know what heat is.
You cannot trap light.
You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas.
The atmosphere is not a blanket.
Because you keep trying to:
Create energy out of nothing.
Trap heat.
Trap light.
Heat a warmer surface using a colder gas.
The atmosphere is not a blanket. You are STILL trying to trap heat. You are ignoring radiant heat, convective heat, and conductive heat. You are ignoring the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and the 1st and 2nd laws of thermodynamics.
1st law of thermodynamics: E(t+1) = E(t) - U
You cannot create energy out of nothing.
2nd law of thermodynamics: e(t+1) >= e(t)
You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas. You cannot trap heat.
Stefan-Boltzmann law: r = C*e*t^4
You cannot trap light or heat.
Because you keep trying to heat a warmer surface using a colder gas or you try to trap heat.
It is YOU playing word games. You cannot project YOUR problems on anybody else.
The atmosphere is not a blanket.
Not the reason, and temperature swing does nothing to the temperature of any planet.
You are wordstuffing again. Attempted proof by assumption.
RQAA. Go back and read the entire thread.
"The atmosphere is not a blanket."
Lol. Right on cue. That's all you got. Childish word games.
Just call me Nostradamus!
You can't actually explain why a person in a 70 degree room, with a 75° blankets, can keep them selves feeling warm. All you got is word games. Better luck next time, buddy!
IBDaMann
Well-known member
The monkey is on your back. You need to learn what heat is. You need to learn what work is. You won't be getting off the hook by "issuing a challenge" to others to accept the monkey from you.
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
No kidding. It usually only takes 2-3 rounds of Sybil's circular bullshit to bore me.
More fun to go to his online manifest and bring it up to him.
Something like his election obsession: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/thread/92/lefty-election-fraud LOL
https://politiplex.freeforums.net/
ZenMode
Well-known member
Here is a summary of Into the night's explanation of why a blanket on a person doesn't violate the second law of thermodynamics, but the Earth's atmosphere does:
"The atmosphere is not a blanket.
A blanket is not a coat.
A coat is not a comforter.
(Insert an equation found on the internet)
Therefore, If the atmosphere is not a blanket and the atmosphere is not the Earth's climate, then climate change can't be real. Thank you.
I almost forgot. Finkel is Einhorn."
"The atmosphere is not a blanket.
A blanket is not a coat.
A coat is not a comforter.
(Insert an equation found on the internet)
Therefore, If the atmosphere is not a blanket and the atmosphere is not the Earth's climate, then climate change can't be real. Thank you.
I almost forgot. Finkel is Einhorn."
IBDaMann
Well-known member
That's all you got. Denial. You can't rebut anything because you don't know anything. You refer to people conversing over your head as them "playing word games" instead of honestly admitting that you can't hang with them in the conversation. You can't actually explain how CO2 magically causes an increase in thermal energy in the form of a temperature increase, in direct violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics. All you got is EVASION. You can't actually identify any climate that has changed within the last century. All you got is EVASION.
It sucks to be you.
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
Maybe we both can create us own?
Maybe that's what drove Sybil nuts?
ZenMode
Well-known member
"You can't actually explain how CO2 magically causes an increase in thermal energy in the form of a temperature increase, in direct violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics."
AProudLefty
Black Kitty Ain't Happy
"You can't actually explain how CO2 magically causes an increase in thermal energy in the form of a temperature increase, in direct violation of the 1st law of thermodynamics."
Perfect gif reaction!!! Ima gonna steal that one!
Into the Night
Verified User
So you do not accept the data you have been arguing to support???? Paradox.
No science here...move along...move along...
You obviously do, liar.
You just described a priest.
The rest of what? Your priests?? I would say he is. So am I.
So you want to criticize theories of science, and even discard them. You want to criticize mathematics, and even discard it.
It is YOU claiming made up numbers as 'data'.
No science here...move along...move along...
What 'studies'? Data isn't 'studies'. Science isn't studies either.
Spoken like a true fundamentalist.
Doc Dutch doesn't know what he's doing. He seems to spend most of his time talking to himself, completely oblivious of any conversation.
Into the Night
Verified User
A lame inversion fallacy. It's repeating what someone says back at them, the way a five year old does. It is what you do constantly.
Into the Night
Verified User
The atmosphere is not a blanket. The word games are YOURS.