BREAKING NEWS: Ford polygraph released and guess what?

Uhm - Hmm

Who owns the House?

The Senate?

The White House?

36 of the 50 Governor seats in this Country?

Dismissed .....

Your incompetent side does.

Yup.

Your side does.

And still it is crying that the nasty Dems are obstructing it.

PURE INCOMPETENCE!

More to come showing that incompetence.
 
"Oh, those nasty Democrats won't let us do what we want to do. They are bullying us...even though we outnumber them in every facet of government."

If you had a brain you would be using it to be embarrassed.

If you were a man, you wouldn't hide behind the ignore, boy. Let me know when you no longer want to act like a coward.
 
They should not be trying to determine who is lying. (That should be a function of the FBI, which the Republicans are avoiding.)

The purpose of this testimony should be to determine (if possible) which of the two sounds more credible...which story seems closer to the truth.
Republicans know he isn't credible. Why would they hide thousands of documents that would offer an insight into Kavanaugh?
 
deserves a lol and a qft.

I for one look forward to our new rapist justice.

Slander and hearsay! all you got of course these women should be put in stocks and publicly shamed! they should have the sign around them saying political whores for rent.
 
They should not be trying to determine who is lying. (That should be a function of the FBI, which the Republicans are avoiding.)

The purpose of this testimony should be to determine (if possible) which of the two sounds more credible...which story seems closer to the truth.

FBI won't touch it, there is nothing to investigate, do you think there are forensics to get after 35 years? Police won't touch it, there is no there, there. How can they get the truth when she doesn't remember, ramirez doesn't remember, he never touched the last girl, and she never saw him actually do anything, just states he was there. I see your from jersey which explains a lot .
 
FBI won't touch it, there is nothing to investigate, do you think there are forensics to get after 35 years? Police won't touch it, there is no there, there. How can they get the truth when she doesn't remember, ramirez doesn't remember, he never touched the last girl, and she never saw him actually do anything, just states he was there. I see your from jersey which explains a lot .


Indeed....there is no crime under investigation the only thing being investigated is the character of those testifying today, the only criminal activity that can come from the hearing today would be the act of someone presenting a statement this is obviously a lie. Anyone stupid enough to perjury themselves deserves whatever punishment comes with such stupidity. You think this administration is toothless and a paper tiger? Just ask the 26 deep state employees that have been fired, resigned, or demoted over the course of the past few months. Again...it will shock the nation if this accuser actually shows up on the hill today to be grilled by a professional prosecutor.
 
FBI won't touch it, there is nothing to investigate, do you think there are forensics to get after 35 years? Police won't touch it, there is no there, there. How can they get the truth when she doesn't remember, ramirez doesn't remember, he never touched the last girl, and she never saw him actually do anything, just states he was there. I see your from jersey which explains a lot .

They can’t even charge someone with lying because there are no bareboned facts to work with. Zero. Zip. Nada.

A conflicting statement is not a lie. In absence of *facts*, if A contradicts B, there’s not much else to be said about it.
 
Republicans know he isn't credible. Why would they hide thousands of documents that would offer an insight into Kavanaugh?

because they already provided more documents on Kavanagh than any other SCJ nominee's in history, combined

why don't you and your moonbat friends take a few days off from the forum

your dream is about to unravel...MOONBAT ALERT ISSUED NATIONWIDE
:rofl2:
 
FBI won't touch it, there is nothing to investigate,

There is EVERYTHING to investigate...which probably is why the Republicans are so dead set against asking the FBI to do it.

If they thought for a second NOTHING would come up...they would ask for that in a New York second.



do you think there are forensics to get after 35 years? Police won't touch it, there is no there, there. How can they get the truth when she doesn't remember, ramirez doesn't remember, he never touched the last girl, and she never saw him actually do anything, just states he was there.

That is for the FBI to determine...not an asshole like you.


I see your from jersey which explains a lot .

Yeah. In New Jersey...we like to be fair and above board...even to jerk-offs like you.
 
Do you know why polygraph tests are not only not admissible in court but aren't even allowed to be used by potential employers when interviewing job candidates?

I believe they can be and are used by employers. In fact the FBI for instance
 
FBI won't touch it, there is nothing to investigate, do you think there are forensics to get after 35 years? Police won't touch it, there is no there, there. How can they get the truth when she doesn't remember, ramirez doesn't remember, he never touched the last girl, and she never saw him actually do anything, just states he was there. I see your from jersey which explains a lot .

The FBI will "touch it" if asked to...and absolutely can do so competently
 
Given that no one on either side has any actual evidence, then waiting is not going to help. The results of any further investigation will be inconclusive and no minds will be changed.

If we were dealing with a science proposition instead of accusations they would be considered unfalsifiable. In other words, neither side can prove their case. If Kavanaugh is innocent, he has no way of proving it—given the nature of the accusations against him.

The Salem Witch Hunts are a great analogy. It’s impossible to prove you’re not a Witch for *precisely* the same sorts of reasons Kavanaugh can’t prove he *didn’t* engage in rape parties in the early 80’s.

Not surprisingly, our legal system was designed to prevent this sort of thing. Presumption of innocence, for one. That principle was designed to protect innocent people from the mob or from Twitter vigilantes who are trying to lynch the wrong person. Or perhaps the ‘right’ person, if there’s an agenda afoot.

The principles are there to protect the innocent.

A couple of accusers have indicated that there were witnesses. There are also people they told the stories to right away, and there could be therapy notes in some cases.

There is more to investigate than you're indicating. Your post is more along the lines of the "let's quickly sweep all of this under the rug" vibe that we've seen on the right from the start on this.

You guys have to start treating this kind of thing more seriously. Kav could very well be innocent - but why would you want someone on the court when more might still come out about this that could be incriminating? More time & investigation is warranted here. Both sides should want that.
 
Do you think I am in favor of Ford, my post is an indication of how stupid this whole thing is, she and the others are simply lying whores.
 
A couple of accusers have indicated that there were witnesses. There are also people they told the stories to right away, and there could be therapy notes in some cases.

There is more to investigate than you're indicating. Your post is more along the lines of the "let's quickly sweep all of this under the rug" vibe that we've seen on the right from the start on this.

You guys have to start treating this kind of thing more seriously. Kav could very well be innocent - but why would you want someone on the court when more might still come out about this that could be incriminating? More time & investigation is warranted here. Both sides should want that.
Whose accusations seem "credible" to you, ‘especially considering the timing and how this all came to light? I'm asking sincerely...
 
Whose accusations seem "credible" to you, ‘especially considering the timing and how this all came to light? I'm asking sincerely...

No, you're not. You're attention-whoring again. Say, have you met Wolverine on this thread? You two ought to hook up. Maybe you could have your first date at the Red Hen. lol
 
Whose accusations seem "credible" to you, ‘especially considering the timing and how this all came to light? I'm asking sincerely...

I haven't heard any of the women speak. The timeframe is 100% meaningless to me, because I understand that victims can take years to speak out, and that many never do.

I don't believe or disbelieve any of them; nor do I believe or disbelieve Kav at this point. That's why more time is needed on this.
 
You guys have to start treating this kind of thing more seriously. Kav could very well be innocent - but why would you want someone on the court when more might still come out about this that could be incriminating? More time & investigation is warranted here. Both sides should want that.

Exactly. Let's say that K. is confirmed, and as time goes on, more and more events are uncovered similar to the ones he's being accused of currently. Eventually impeachment will be discussed, maybe even accomplished. The GOPs will suffer a lot more damage from that than if they agree now to further investigation that *proves* Dr. Ford et al are lying, as the Reichwingers claim.
 
Back
Top