Dutch should have been banned for a 12 B antisemitic attack on the Frank sisters
Now it was antisemitic as well?

Dutch should have been banned for a 12 B antisemitic attack on the Frank sisters
Meaning Trump?
![]()
If all they make here is $3 a day, I would say thy are fools to go to this expense with no return for their investment dollar.
I am hurt that you dont know me better.
I do not own the servers. I use somebody else for that.
No worries. My main reason was to use that meme again. I crack myself up.![]()
I do not own the servers. I use somebody else for that.
Now it was antisemitic as well?For heaven's sake Mason, you need to forget that nonsense. After all the time defending you against Top, it's a smack in the face to in turn pull her shtick. Everything was settled. Dutch immediately said with a sense of confusion that he was talking about your socks. I was watching the entire squabble you two were having and saw it myself. The mods all ruled on it as well. What he did say was to an effect of you having a sock account fetish and getting freaky with your socks that you knowingly named after people. Even those comments that broke no rules weren't out of left field. You were playing games with Dutchie because of what he said about people that use sock accounts.
Do you have any insights on how long this place will be allowed to exist?
As long as the bills are paid, why wouldn't it be allowed to exist?
Do you think PornHub would be going away? Twitter?
As long as the bills are paid, why wouldn't it be allowed to exist?
Do you think PornHub would be going away? Twitter?
For the same reason that sites that have comment sections that do not silence those who defy the orthodoxy on race and gender are finding themselves threatened with defunding by the tech overlords....The Drive to UTOPIA.
Minds must be properly molded....there must be complience with the established Mind Molding Programs.
Dutch should have been banned for a 12 B antisemitic attack on the Frank sisters
Got any examples? Isn't that what Libertarians and Republican groups have been fighting for: to allow business owners to run their businesses as they see fit?
If you and I start up a social media site, shouldn't we both the right and the responsibility to limit or throw out subscribers?
Even if they were paying money to join, which this site, Twitter and most do not, wouldn't we and shouldn't we have those powers?
Do you have any insights on how long this place will be allowed to exist?
So far it's been 14 years.
My example is the number of comment sections that have been closed over the last two months.
The Tech Overlords imagine that they are a second government and they fully intend to get to UTOPIA, they are carrying out the agenda that they learned in their Brain Washing sessions at the failed universities....your focus is all wrong.
Blame the fucking lawyers, not the "Tech Overlords" whoever the fuck they are.
Your "liberal" thinking about nationalizing social media is wrong.
Your lack of answer is noted.
I think it will exist for a long time, since you are going to pretend to be stupid. It's already been a long time.