The GOP has no policy to run on

Matt Dillon said:
Kennedy was alright. These leftist wackadoodles are NOT.
Click to expand...

John Kennedy and Harry Truman are held in the utmost esteem in the Democratic Party. They are icons of the party.

The reason you want to attempt to steal the glory of Kennedy and Truman is because you belong to the party of Richard Nixon, George Dumbya Bush, and Donald J. Trumpf.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
so you're a racist. got it
Click to expand...

So you're not a white guy?

Why is it that whenever direct questions like that are asked, you people always skirt around answering them?


YOU have your version of history, the rest of us have reality. the two are not the same
Click to expand...

Your fantasy is that Republicans went after Domestic Terrorists at one point, but you can't actually cite what you're talking about there, and any efforts to get that clarity were efforts you ignored.

So I'm left to play a guessing game and make assumptions of you because you're not forthcoming with whatever it is you're trying to say.
 
Stone said:
You talk a lot about that in here. Ive seen it. Projection much? Maybe its time you go see someone about your clinical depression son.
Click to expand...

I have nothing to be depressed about because I didn't volunteer to toil the baggage of a reality TV show host for the rest of my life, not his.
 
LV426 said:
So you're not a white guy?
Why is it that whenever direct questions like that are asked, you people always skirt around answering them?
Click to expand...
why is it that you consider white men 'terrorists'????? is it because you're a racist???

LV426 said:
Your fantasy is that Republicans went after Domestic Terrorists at one point, but you can't actually cite what you're talking about there, and any efforts to get that clarity were efforts you ignored.
Click to expand...
how is it you were able to skate through school with such lousy reading comprehension and memory retention?

LV426 said:
So I'm left to play a guessing game and make assumptions of you because you're not forthcoming with whatever it is you're trying to say.
Click to expand...
I stated very clearly that the definition of 'terror' was loosely defined by the government. so loosely, in fact, that drug dealing was used as a pretext to use the patriot act against them. I was also very clear in that democrats continued using this because they loved it so much. namely OBAMA
 
LV426 said:
But it is free at the point of service, and what difference does that distinction make?
Click to expand...

it makes a HUGE difference, unless you're saying that you don't pay property tax, or pay for gas, or pay county taxes when you register a vehicle...the list goes on. it's not free and pretending 'point of service' makes it free is idiocy at it's best. maybe that's what allows you to moronically think that the military can act on its own or that the founders intended a government controlled/regulated military when they said militia, especially considering the reasons why they fought a war
 
SmarterthanYou said:
why is it that you consider white men 'terrorists'????? is it because you're a racist???
Click to expand...

See, you didn't even answer it.

You accused me of being racist, but then when it comes time for you to be honest about your race, you choke.

The reason I think white men are more likely to be terrorists than anyone else is because they have been more terrorists than anyone else.

You seem really angry that you are being lumped in with them because of your race, but it's not your race that is lumping you in with them...it's your beliefs.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
I stated very clearly that the definition of 'terror' was loosely defined by the government.
Click to expand...

OK, but we were talking about domestic terrorists, and you're trying to shift that to other terrorists, like those we went after during the War on Turr.


SmarterthanYou said:
so loosely, in fact, that drug dealing was used as a pretext to use the patriot act against them. I was also very clear in that democrats continued using this because they loved it so much. namely OBAMA
Click to expand...

This is just gibberish.
 
Cypress said:
Medicaid was a typo in my post, but it is a real program. Another Democratic program which millions of Trump loving Deplorables avail themselves of.

If you do not know what Medicaid is, you should not even be posting on a political forum. Your ignorance leads me to believe you and your relatives enthusiastically avail themselves of many programs which were brainchilds of liberals without even realizing it.
Click to expand...

I'm sure Matt will be grateful that when his parents retire, they don't have to come live with him because they weren't able to save up enough while raising him to make ends meet.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
it makes a HUGE difference, unless you're saying that you don't pay property tax, or pay for gas, or pay county taxes when you register a vehicle...the list goes on.
Click to expand...

I think everyone understands that M4A or free public college tuition are paid by the taxes we all pay.

Like, literally no one thinks otherwise.


it's not free and pretending 'point of service' makes it free is idiocy at it's best. maybe that's what allows you to moronically think that the military can act on its own or that the founders intended a government controlled/regulated military when they said militia, especially considering the reasons why they fought a war
Click to expand...

You seem to have a lot of problems with this country, so maybe you should just leave it for one that more aligns with your behavior, personality, and ideals.

You can always head over to Russia; they have everything you could possibly want in an autocracy.

I'll even pack your bags for you.
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
I'm sure Matt will be grateful that when his parents retire, they don't have to come live with him because they weren't able to save up enough while raising him to make ends meet.
Click to expand...

Matt be one of the dotards who hollered: "Get your government hands off my Medicare!"
 
ThatOwlWoman said:
Socialism mixed with capitalism is one of the most successful economic schemes we have. The most prosperous countries on the planet utilize it, including the United States.

I'm assuming, of course, that you mean "socialism" in the sense that it's most commonly used when talking politics, not the economic system where the government controls the means of production.
Click to expand...

Less socialism = more freedom and that's the best system for people who value freedom above all else. Obviously you do not. So how about we follow the Constitution, where GovCo power is centered in the states and FedCo provides minimal services. That way you can live in a socialist state and I can live in a free one.
 
Jim Eagle said:
Why? Are Americans the same as Canadians? Far easier for you and other like-minded individuals just to move up there.
Click to expand...

Yes, Americans and Canadians share the same DNA...there is no genetic -or other scientific- difference between them.
 
Jim Eagle said:
Less socialism = more freedom
Click to expand...

This is completely wrong and I'll even show you how it's wrong.

Take health care, for example.

Right now, you are free to see a doctor...so long as you have health insurance, and so long as that doctor accepts your health insurance.

But that's the extent of your freedom.

You are not free to choose any doctor you want in our current system because of provider networks.

So you are limited in your freedoms to choose the provider for your health care from a list of doctors pre-approved by your insurance company.

If you want to go to a doctor that isn't on that list, you have to pay extra in addition to paying the premiums and deductibles you already pay your insurance company for access to the pre-approved doctors they chose for you.

In a single payer health care system, there are no provider groups, so there are no out of network doctors, which means you can go to any doctor you want.

Is that more or less freedom than being able to only go to the doctors your insurance company says are OK?
 
LV426 said:
This is completely wrong and I'll even show you how it's wrong.

Take health care, for example.

Right now, you are free to see a doctor...so long as you have health insurance, and so long as that doctor accepts your health insurance.

But that's the extent of your freedom.

You are not free to choose any doctor you want in our current system because of provider networks.

So you are limited in your freedoms to choose the provider for your health care from a list of doctors pre-approved by your insurance company.

If you want to go to a doctor that isn't on that list, you have to pay extra in addition to paying the premiums and deductibles you already pay your insurance company for access to the pre-approved doctors they chose for you.

In a single payer health care system, there are no provider groups, so there are no out of network doctors, which means you can go to any doctor you want.

Is that more or less freedom than being able to only go to the doctors your insurance company says are OK?
Click to expand...

So you'd make doctors slaves to the system.
 
Jim Eagle said:
Less socialism = more freedom and that's the best system for people who value freedom above all else.
Click to expand...

If you have to live in a society where you fear gun-toting criminals so much that you sleep with a loaded gun under your pillow, then you're not free.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top