Melchizedek = Michael
Verified User
The OP's claim is that climatology is a religion and we have churches.
Depends on ones definition of religion.
The OP's claim is that climatology is a religion and we have churches.
Sure. Either Jesus was going to build a physical building on top of Peter, or Peter was going to be the leader who would serve to solidly unite the people under the faith.Let's let the Bible describe church.
That's a possibility. There are glasses in the ground at Sodom.
Sure. Either Jesus was going to build a physical building on top of Peter, or Peter was going to be the leader who would serve to solidly unite the people under the faith.
Hmmmm. Well, I'm stumped.
Sure. Either Jesus was going to build a physical building on top of Peter, or Peter was going to be the leader who would serve to solidly unite the people under the faith.
Hmmmm. Well, I'm stumped.
Depends on ones definition of religion.
A set of axioms that are adopted as true, without any rational basis (science, math, logic) for accepting them as true.Depends on ones definition of religion.
A set of axioms that are adopted as true, without any rational basis (science, math, logic) for accepting them as true.
No deities are required.
The definition of religion is clear. It is a worship of deities and a belief in miracles and the supernatural.
Some people worship money,power,orgasms,not everyones religion is related to belief in deities
You can't claim that it is somehow clear when you yourself are very confused on the matter, to the point of living in denial.The definition of religion is clear.
No deities are required. You have been given plenty of examples of religions without any deities. You keep falling back on denial.It is a worship of deities and ...
So then you don't consider Shinto or Buddhism or any of the Indian tribal belief systems religions?
Negative. No religion is required to hold any particular belief or axiom in order to be a religion.a belief in miracles and the supernatural.
You are objectively incorrect. This has been spelled out for you. You are merely chanting and living in denial.Religion is the worship of deities.
You are objectively incorrect. This has been spelled out for you. You are merely chanting and living in denial.
You can't claim that it is somehow clear when you yourself are very confused on the matter, to the point of living in denial.
No deities are required.
You have also been provided the deities of your religion
For everyone else tuning in, you might have heard of Buddhist monks. The "monks" part confirms that Buddhism is a religion. Buddhism has no deities. Into the Night weighed in better than I have done when he addressed the point:
Negative. No religion is required to hold any particular belief or axiom in order to be a religion.
We've already covered this. You suck at logic. If a homicide detective is going to get someone convicted, he has to first show that there has been a murder, and then he has to show that said suspect was the culprit.Know what you sound like to me? Since homicide detectives have not observed murderers in action, all those cases should be overturned.
We already covered this. You suck at logic. I do not have any affirmative belief on the matter. My position is characterized by my not having any belief that any flash-freezing happened. Your strange belief that you are somehow omniscient concerning unobserved events of the distant past is common in the various sects of the Global Warming faiths.So you believe that the mass flash freezing never happened? That is a religion.
Once again you have not provided any rational basis for your WACKY beliefs, you have EVADED and finally you have distracted. Box checked.Once again, you have not answered my question.
We've already covered this. You suck at logic. If a homicide detective is going to get someone convicted, he has to first show that there has been a murder, and then he has to show that said suspect was the culprit.
We already covered this. You suck at logic. I do not have any affirmative belief on the matter. My position is characterized by my not having any belief that any flash-freezing happened. Your strange belief that you are somehow omniscient concerning unobserved events of the distant past is common in the various sects of the Global Warming faiths.
Once again you have not provided any rational basis for your WACKY beliefs, you have EVADED and finally you have distracted. Box checked.
I think we're done here. We have reached the point where you are offering nothing but chanting and denial. You certainly aren't providing any science for your WACKY beliefs. You are not moving forward. If this were an MMA bout, the ref would stand you up and tell you to get moving.There is no denial. Climatology does not have any deity. You are the one who is in denial.
I don't know where you got this. I did not agree to such. Climate-anything is a religious faith. You can't offer anything but chanting and denial.Thank you for agreeing that climatology is not a religion. Small steps.
Although religions can certainly have philosophies, philosophies don't have monks. Religions have monks.It is a philosophy and spirituality.
Nope. We're pretty much done.We are making progresses.
I think we're done here. We have reached the point where you are offering nothing but chanting and denial. You certainly aren't providing any science for your WACKY beliefs. You are not moving forward. If this were an MMA bout, the ref would stand you up and tell you to get moving.
I don't know where you got this. I did not agree to such. Climate-anything is a religious faith. You can't offer anything but chanting and denial.
Although religions can certainly have philosophies, philosophies don't have monks. Religions have monks.
Nope. We're pretty much done.
Science is determined by repeatable experiments having predictable outcomes.
"Climate Scientists" have naught but theory and computer modeling and conjecture.
The public is familiar with what these terms represent.