ThatOwlWoman
Leftist Vermin
I bet the donations to the prestigious 154 are just pouring in....(I want to know why 7 out of 10 didn't respond to the request...)
Poor thing.

I bet the donations to the prestigious 154 are just pouring in....(I want to know why 7 out of 10 didn't respond to the request...)
Nasty evil cunt say what?
I bet the donations to the prestigious 154 are just pouring in....(I want to know why 7 out of 10 didn't respond to the request...)
She’s all but admitted that. Also never had an orgasm.Owl woman is married to a democrat. Translation??????????????????????? No sex for sure.
Hillary Clinton leads Trump in all the pre 2016 polls and yet Trump still thinks he has a chance to win.volsrock said:Trump last
Yet..he leads Biden in the polls
Now thats funny
Collusion was proven, Russians even admitted to it. The investigation said as much but that he could not prosecute. you assholes claiming no collusion are full of it.
Senate Russia report proves Trump collusion was very real. But do voters care?
...With over 200 witness interviews and roughly 1 million documents reviewed, the nearly 1,000-page report documents in detail the comprehensive campaign conducted by Russian President Vladimir Putin and his proxies to seek influence within President Donald Trump's campaign, help Trump win the 2016 presidential election and amplify polarization and division within American society.
Far from a hoax, as the president so often claimed, the report reveals how the Trump campaign willingly engaged with Russian operatives implementing the influence effort. For instance, the report exposes interactions and information exchanged between Russian intelligence officer Konstantin Kilimnik and then-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort. According to the report, campaign figures “presented attractive targets for foreign influence, creating notable counterintelligence vulnerabilities.” ...
The bipartisan tone of the majority of the report, released by a committee chaired by Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, should be welcomed by all Americans who want our elected leaders to protect American sovereignty. National security should never be a partisan issue...
The poll has been sourced a dozen times so far if you are too damn stupid to figure out where it is or how to open it nobody here can help you. The same group has been doing this for over 100 years so you go ahead and call it bullshit if you would like but the fact remains, the shithead you support is the worst president in history.
Says who? The NY Slimes?![]()
Uh , no shit.The cold war was ongoing long before LBJ, Kennedy or even Eisenhower.
Correct. You can’t blame anyone in particular for starting the Cold War unnecessarily and under false pretenses.Your comment shows just what the fuck you know.
It's a survey of professional historians.
confirmation that the survey can be totally ignored for not being based in reality
This is a ranking of 45 presidents of the United States.
Your average nitwit on the street wouldn't have a clue how to rank Rutherford B. Hayes or Zachary Taylor, and most likely have never heard of them.
There are some topics that are appropriate to consult with the experts on.
confirmation that the survey can be totally ignored for not being based in reality
you would think, but the last 20 years has been proof positive that the 'experts' aren't about facts, but about a narrative
Agreed. The Cold War was a result of the end of WWII and the invention of atomic weapons. It was the result of the conflict between democratic nations AKA the Free World versus the totalitarian socialists, the USSR and PRC.Uh , no shit. Correct. You can’t blame anyone in particular for starting the Cold War unnecessarily and under false pretenses.
Or maybe you do?
And yet “not that smart” will quickly accept such as Thomas’s sophomoric history interpretation in the Bruen case, the historians don’t know history but a political hack does
Given a pool of average nitwits on the street who have never heard of Martin Van Buren, Rutherford B. Hayes, or Millard Fillmore, then we are going to consult the experts who devoted a life to studying the presidency if we are going to construct a ranking of 45 American presidents
The poll is bullshit!
How much have you donated to Trump campaign? Did you buy the Action Cards of trump? Did you purchase the sneakers? How many pairs?
Are you on a monthly donation schedule? Did you give Trump your checking account number? Are you still sucking his dick?
Methinks 'yes' to every question. Am I right?
The poll had less than 300 respondents. It's laughable really.
Were they just anyone online, accredited historians or any kind of knowledgeable person?
The poll had less than 300 respondents. It's laughable really.
Any nitwit on the street can be a member for 10 bucks.Given a pool of average nitwits on the street who have never heard of Martin Van Buren, Rutherford B. Hayes, or Millard Fillmore, then we are going to consult the experts who devoted a life to studying the presidency if we are going to construct a ranking of 45 American presidents