1932 was a pivotal year in the Nazis’ ascent. It’s a terrifying parallel for today

[Dutch Uncle]

Let's play a little game that I like to call: "Spot the Difference"​

There's also this comparison:

 

[Guno צְבִי]

Nah, there's your regular Jews, and then there's the Bolshevik Jews.

Most are regular Jews. Oh! but not in the media. In the entertainment, yes, not the news, oh!

I love me some Howard brothers. Marx brothers too.

There are xtians and subhummann goyim like you

 

[Matt Dillon]

You'd see better if you stopped looking through the bottom of a bottle, Matt. Jus' sayin'.

I don't drink liquor...much.

Very rarely and very carefully.

 

[Matt Dillon]

There are xtians and subhummann goyim like you

 

[Dutch Uncle]

I don't drink liquor...much.

Very rarely and very carefully.

So it's the drugs that fuck you up every day or are you just such an alkie burnout that the damage is now permanent?

 

[Magats_Love_NHB]

I don't drink liquor...much.

Very rarely and very carefully.

Your posts prove that is a lie.

 

[Guno צְבִי]

The article posted in the op was from "The Forward " The Jewish daily Forward first published in 1897 originally in Yiddish, my grandparents used to read it.


Yet people go apeshit or pigshit

 

[Matt Dillon]

So it's the drugs that fuck you up every day or are you just such an alkie burnout that the damage is now permanent?

Dutch, I have nowhere near the level of dain bramage you do.

 

[Uncensored2008]

What these parallels teach us: When an unpopular political movement is poised to take power it suspects it cannot legitimately maintain, democracy is endangered, with dire consequences for all of us. As the seeming inevitability of Trump’s election has increased with the Supreme Court’s recent ruling granting presidents immunity from prosecution for official acts undertaken in office — a feather in Trump’s cap after a dismal debate performance by President Joe Biden led Trump to his highest polling numbers since 2015 — the seriousness of this threat cannot be overstated.


And it’s not just increased legal immunity that has enhanced Trump’s seeming inevitability. Even more effective was the defiant invulnerability he appeared to embody after an assassination attempt on him last weekend. Leaving that Pennsylvania field, blood streaming from one ear and fist raised high, the double role Trump prefers — that of both a victim, and a savior whose righteous path is now marked out — seemed newly clarified, and newly persuasive.

The idea of a ‘unified Reich’​

The sense of certainty offers a huge psychological advantage to Trump’s campaign, during which he has sought to paint a picture of a unified America rallying behind him in protest of his victimization by state and federal prosecutors. He has promised, if he wins in November, to vindicate not just himself, but all the victims of the supposed damage wrought by tone-deaf elites under Biden.

There are identifiable culprits who have ruined America, he tells his followers, promising that they will be held accountable and locked up. He has referred to “military tribunals,” and the strong hands that will also repair “American carnage.” As he depicts a fateful struggle for the soul of the country, the muscular populism he preaches is pure melodrama. It casts purposeful redeemers against terrible villains. In Trump’s view, the U.S. resembles a crime scene in which order can and must be restored, through police action if necessary.


There’s a clear parallel to the rhetoric that fueled the Nazis’ rise. They billed themselves as speaking for the Germans who felt they had been stabbed in the back during World War I by domestic criminals, including Marxists, profiteers and Jews. Their vision was at once optimistic and conspiratorial; once the swamp was drained, new glories would emerge.

Thanks Herr Himmler.

We'll take your idiocy for all it's value.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Notice how shrill the Marxists get as the panic really sets in?

The entertainment is priceless.

 

[Magats_Love_NHB]

 

[Goyboy]

The article posted in the op was from "The Forward " The Jewish daily Forward first published in 1897 originally in Yiddish, my grandparents used to read it.


Yet people go apeshit or pigshit

The Forward is a leftist rag. So what does that prove? You're still pulling shit out your ass and serving it like it was filet mignon.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Notice how shrill the Marxists get as the panic really sets in?

The entertainment is priceless.

I notice how upset you become when called out for your idiocy, Sybil.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Dutch, I have nowhere near the level of dain bramage you do.

No doubt you truly want to believe that but doubt you are that brain-dead. The holes alcohol has bored through your brain makes it difficult for you to think, but you can recognize your superiors. That's why I upset you so much.

 

[Matt Dillon]

I notice how upset you become when called out for your idiocy, Sybil.

Dutch, Dutch.. is Uncensored Sybil, or Legion? You can't have it both ways.

 

[Matt Dillon]

No doubt you truly want to believe that but doubt you are that brain-dead. The holes alcohol has bored through your brain makes it difficult for you to think, but you can recognize your superiors. That's why I upset you so much.

Thanks for the lulz!

 

[Nordberg]

Comparisons between Trump and Hitler are just Godwin's Law violations.

Nope. Godwin says if an online discussion continues long enough, it will end up with Hitler being used. The Hitler comparisons are what the thread is about.

 

[Matt Dillon]

Nope. Godwin says if an online discussion continues long enough, it will end up with Hitler being used. The Hitler comparisons are what the thread is about.

 

[Dutch Uncle]

Thanks for the lulz!

If you weren't such a demented old drunk, you'd realize such tactics don't work on sane, educated and intelligent adults, Matt.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Nope. Godwin says if an online discussion continues long enough, it will end up with Hitler being used. The Hitler comparisons are what the thread is about.

It is about using a Hitler / Nazis comparison to something that is specious. That is, the comparison is inappropriate, gratuitous, or meant to slander or disparage the target of the comparison.