No, you won't. . Guns are barely regulated. The time to get more regulation is here. Register them. Get a license. take classes in gun use. Have a license qualified for and renewed every 2 years. Kinda like cars.
You rightys talk so tough.
2nd Amendment Conversation from the Defund thread
- Thread starter danielpalos
- Start date
No, you won't. . Guns are barely regulated. The time to get more regulation is here. Register them. Get a license. take classes in gun use. Have a license qualified for and renewed every 2 years. Kinda like cars.
You rightys talk so tough.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you're a special kind of stupid, aren't yosu?
Into the Night
Verified User
No. The people do too.
Into the Night
Verified User
Since he utterly discards it, that's obvious.
Really fleshed that discussion out didn't you. Did you think you added to the debate?
Not gonna happen
FJB
The NRA used to back registering guns until the gun manufacturers took them over. The makers pull the strings and Americans die.
Into the Night
Verified User
No. Go read the 2nd amendment again.
2nd Amendment said:
See the word 'people' in there? It means everyone, not just a militia.
* a State has the right to defend itself by forming a militia.
* the people have the right to defend itself by keeping and bearing Arms.
Congress cannot infringe on any of it.
No State can infringe on any of it.
Into the Night
Verified User
The NRA isn't the Constitution of the United States, dumbass.
Not at the grassroots. And we are not responsible for criminal use of firearms. You fools keep saying it's the gun manufacturers pulling strings, it's not. At least not down here.
danielpalos
Verified User
What is your native language? You too ignorant to argue with in English.
Into the Night
Verified User
Describing yourself again?
danielpalos
Verified User
I can resort to the fewest fallacies, unlike those of the Opposing View.
We had a beginning country with no standing army and no tax system. The army was the citizens. In case you have not noticed, that is not the America of today. The Brits attacked the armories when they started the wars. They encouraged weapons because the people were the soldiers who save the country. Now right-wingers have convinced themselves that guns were intended to fight the government. How stupid is that?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
True enough! But like it or not, guns must be regulated as well, least you want to come across some yahoo with a .50 machine gun on his roof who mistakes you for a crook on night.
danielpalos
Verified User
SmarterthanYou
rebel
numerous historical quotations have been provided here dozens of times showing you that the founders DISTRUSTED government and that private citizens, armed with the same weapons of warfare that the government would have, were essential to keep the government in check, or at the very least, outgunned by the citizenry..............why do you ignore all of those?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
WHY, when the founders of this nation distrusted government so much that every piece of historical documentation notates that the new federal government would have ZERO power or authority over the arms of the people?
danielpalos
Verified User
This is what they actually wrote as our supreme law of the land: To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;