TOP
Retired Teacher
Excellent questionhow did you come to that conclusion?
Excellent questionhow did you come to that conclusion?
But there are not open borders. Europe has real open borders, but the USA does not.The open borders aren't helping things, Yes, we are along the lines of a third world country. It has been going on for years.
I'm used to sitting across the table from foreigners and anti-Americans, Joe. Of course there will be some things in which we agreed. We're both human regardless of your personal limitations.I guess pigs have flown. Commander Cunt and I agree on something
How many shootouts have you been a part of in the US? Me? None.I know this- There was a time and place called the Wild, WIld West. In towns across the West, it became unsafe because of all the shoot-outs in the streets, at every card table, in every saloon, and lots of innocent men, women, children, and even horses were being shot and dying from all of the collateral damage. It was because every man carried, and if you didn't, you had no way to defend yourself when the bullets started firing.
It got so bad, some very brave lawmen started passing No-Carry laws in town. I say brave, because in order to insure the law was being followed, these lawmen would have to challenge men who did not follow the law, and had to disarm them and arrest them. It was a dangerous job just trying to enforce the law. But the towns eventually got cleaned up, they became civilized, and the OLD WEST came to an end.
This was not just in the Movies- THIS IS AMERICAN HISTORY 101!
And now, we are back into the WILD, WILD, WEST- THANKS TO THE OPEN CARRY LAW!
And the looser the law is on guns, the more dangerous it is getting for the rest of us!
WHAT WE NEED IS A NEW SHERIFF IN TOWN- if we are to be a civilized NATION again!
Marines know that it takes a minimum of a 3 to 1 ratio of attack versus defending. The attackers are likely to suffer higher casualties if solely using infantry. Clearly it's more dangerous to be on the offense than the defense without overwhelming force and combined arms....and not so great even then.I don't believe that the study that uncovered my statistic differentiated between offense and defense. Simply used all self defense shootings by civilians and compared to all shots fired response by law enforcement.
all good points and, yes, for the most part getting the F out of dodge is almost always the best advice.Marines know that it takes a minimum of a 3 to 1 ratio of attack versus defending. The attackers are likely to suffer higher casualties if solely using infantry. Clearly it's more dangerous to be on the offense than the defense without overwhelming force and combined arms....and not so great even then.
The worst place to be is a civilian caught in the crossfire. IMO, in such scenarios, it's best to get the fuck out of Dodge since being in the middle of bullets flying in both directions is not a good survival strategy.
I have no doubt your numbers are accurate, but they are probably distorting the truth on the number of incidents. If there's a 100,000 police incidents and only 10 civilian, then the differences are understandable. Do you have a link to your data?
I'm fine with Big Blue Cities creating more Gun Free Zones. That's where all the shootings happen. LOLYou may want to read some history! GUN LAWS ARE AS OLD AS THE OLD WILD WEST!
Gun Control Is as Old as the Old West
Contrary to the popular imagination, bearing arms on the frontier was a heavily regulated businesswww.smithsonianmag.com
You are worse than worthless in this conversation. "Things is bad. I dunno why. Cain't get better. Fill our schools with guns." Shut up and let the adults talk.You aren't going to talk them out of it at this point in society's decay. It's generational now. What the fuck is wrong with your logic tree?
It makes zero difference what they are motivated by. You and I both know the answers to this and that nothing is on course to change it for the better in this broken society. So what are we going to do just sit around and hope they will get better while leaving our kids in soft target zones?
You mock the airplane door analogy but it's spot on. Make them safe first, then worry about why some idiot would want to shoot them.
Why is this so hard for your brain to digest? Is it really possible for a human to be this irrational and illogical? No doubt you're voting for the filthy whore and her soy boy.
Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, the link to it's data ended up being a dead end due to age(?) It was based on the 1979 paper ; Carol R Silver & Don B. Kates, Jr., Self-Defense, Handgun Ownership, and the Independence of Women in a Violent, Sexist Society, in RESTRICTING HANDGUNS: THE LIBERAL SKEPTICS SPEAK OUT (Don B. Kates, Jr. ed., 1979)all good points and, yes, for the most part getting the F out of dodge is almost always the best advice.
For civilian self defense uses, i'm going to refer to the CDC study that had been started, then stopped by Obama, because of nearly 250,000 a year........granted, not all of them even required a shot. I'm not sure that there are any clear stats as to how many have shots fired. It doesn't sound like a stat that the government wants out there.
For the 11%/2% stat, all I have is the article name, where it came from, and the authors.......no link. but the website that has been producing these has been around for some time.
Gun Facts | Accidental Gun Deaths and Gun Injuries
Research on rates of accidental death and injuries resulting from firearms. Includes national and international perspectives.www.gunfacts.info
When I went to school, I walked 2 miles uphill barefooted! No! That was my Dad's joke!I'm fine with Big Blue Cities creating more Gun Free Zones. That's where all the shootings happen. LOL
Still, the more Democrats and Republicans chip away at our rights, the less rights We, the People, shall have.
So did I! Uphill both ways...in the snow!When I went to school, I walked 2 miles uphill barefooted! No! That was my Dad's joke!
But, I feel very fortunate, for the 12 years I spent in Public Schools, that I didn't have one thought of someone coming into my class with a MACHINE GUN and killing us all!
Can you even imagine what all of these children have experienced over the 20 years, that have survived these thousands of public school shootings, and not just the many thousands of children that were maimed physically for life. But, even the ones that were not shot, but witnessed and experienced these shootings- how those kinds of events can cause PTSD and other mental problems. for life.
And how much grieve all of these parents, siblings, and classmates have had to deal with in having to bury them all because of these unnecessary BARBARIC deaths!
And the thousands of Teachers that have been GUNNED DOWNED- Why has their job become one of the most dangerous jobs in America now?
WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT RIGHTS- WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF ALL THESE PEOPLE I JUST MENTIONED WHO ARE DIRECTLY EFFECTED- PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY-ALL BY THESE SCHOOL SHOOTINGS?
Are your rights more important than theirs?
So did I! Uphill both ways...in the snow!
Sounds like you agree they need better mental health care.
Wow! Thousands of teachers were gunned down? How many are shot to death in their classrooms every year?
Nope. You and Jarod totally own this one. Leftists insist that all schools be defenselessness zones for the single solitary purpose of ensuring that violent criminals are fully aware that nobody is armed and that as many children are gunned down as possible. You and Jarod probably laughed with glee when you learned that Georgia has some of the strictest truancy laws that can have parents charged with misdemeanors for not sufficiently huddling their children into those defenselessness zones. Your glee, however, was probably tempered by the gunman's incompetence at only killing four children despite the Georgia leftists doing so much to set him up for success.We don't expect a cunt like you to not want children gunned down.
Why do you encourage mass killings? Why do you prevent law abiding citizens from defending themselves before violent criminals? Why do you insist that children be compulsorily congregated into deflenselessness zones to be most efficiently murdered?WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT RIGHTS- WHAT ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF ALL THESE PEOPLE I JUST MENTIONED WHO ARE DIRECTLY EFFECTED- PHYSICALLY AND MENTALLY- ALL BY THESE 1,000's of SCHOOL SHOOTINGS?
Well your needing guns to keep us safe argument has been debunked by the facts, America has more guns out there than people and as a result, more shootings, mass shootings, and school shootings. Based on your view we should be the safest nation in the world and the reality is just the oppositeIt is completely moronic to believe you can keep everyone safe by keeping everyone defenseless.
I only count 15 teachers, not "thousands" as you claimed.
I am just going to say- TOO DAMN MANY!
I don't know, but one would have to read through this to do the math!
In @SmarterthanYou 's defense, I think he's more concerned about keeping himself and his family safe, not you per se. Living in rural area where it takes the police up to 30-60 minutes to arrive, I'd rather just handle it myself and tell the police to bring the coroner.Well your needing guns to keep us safe argument has been debunked by the facts, America has more guns out there than people and as a result, more shootings, mass shootings, and school shootings. Based on your view we should be the safest nation in the world and the reality is just the opposite
100%. I wish there was newer data. maybe they are conducting it.Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, the link to it's data ended up being a dead end due to age(?) It was based on the 1979 paper ; Carol R Silver & Don B. Kates, Jr., Self-Defense, Handgun Ownership, and the Independence of Women in a Violent, Sexist Society, in RESTRICTING HANDGUNS: THE LIBERAL SKEPTICS SPEAK OUT (Don B. Kates, Jr. ed., 1979)
Not that I think they are lying, just that I have questions about how they arrived at their figures. Since it's dated data, can we agree further research in that direction is moot? Still, as the quote below points out, there's a lot of reasons for the 11% vs. 2% difference.
All that aside, you and I can agree that the US benefits from a healthy, educated, lawful and armed citizenry.
I ask again, when government or very wealthy feel threatened, they increase the number of guns around them? why should we not follow that example?Well your needing guns to keep us safe argument has been debunked by the facts, America has more guns out there than people and as a result, more shootings, mass shootings, and school shootings. Based on your view we should be the safest nation in the world and the reality is just the opposite
A half a million kids were in schools that had shootings. They will not be so cavalier about gun violence. They will not blindly follow the NRA and gun manufacturers.How many shootouts have you been a part of in the US? Me? None.
The fact remains you exemplify the Democratic agenda on this matter: You put banning guns over better mental health care. You don't give a shit about almost 50,000 suicides every year. You only care about banning guns on the dubious belief that banning guns in America will make everyone safe from gun violence...which, according to the gun banners, includes suicides using guns. They don't care about the hangings, the gassings, the poisonings, drugs, etc. Only the suicides using guns. Sad.