A little reminder for Trump supporters.

Nordberg said:
Hillary's use of a server is not a big deal.
Click to expand...
It is a big deal.
Nordberg said:
It was a regulatory infraction, not a crime.
Click to expand...
It is a federal crime to put classified information on an unauthorized server.
Nordberg said:
She was among the first Secretary of State who had to deal with that problem.
Click to expand...
What 'problem'? Void argument fallacy.
Nordberg said:
But her problems have absolutely nothing to do with Trump's crimes. Trump has more than 4 crimes to deal with.
Click to expand...
What 'crime'? Void argument fallacy.
 
Taichiliberal said:
No stupid, you still have no guile, Guillermo....look up the word.

And once again, you make an absurd assertion in trying to seem profound and clever. Posting a fact either confirms or denies a belief...in this case it proved your previous contentions wrong. What you childishly do when confronted with fact based proof that you are in error is an attempt to BS your way out with some version of "Well, what I really meant was...". Either that or you try to detour the conversation. GTFU, Guillermo.

P.S. - since YOU clarified about the abbreviated name, I merely followed suit. TFB for you that your abbreviation has more than one definition...the latter fitting your presence here. Carry on.
Click to expand...

Random words and phrases. Try English. It works better. Learn what 'fact' means.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Please get a nearby adult to explain to you how to properly apply the word "projection" here, because in the immediate previous post I'm pointing out the insipid stubbornness and stupidity of folks of your mindset. A "projection" on my part would mean that I'm am against the very OP I created. Sorry son, but the chronology of the posts shows that I'm doing nothing of the sort.

Try again.
Click to expand...

I guess you don't understand that word either. Try learning English.
 
Taichiliberal said:
I asked a question about Barr ,,, you didn't answer it. Instead, you gave a "but what about...?" as a detour. Sorry, but that doesn't answer the question...if you're carrying on about corruption in the system in general, does that include Barr?

Oh, and two impeachments kind of shows that the Mueller report was no hoax. If it were, there would be no impeachments from the House. The GOP attempts regarding Hillary turned up ZERO, even when judged by Trump appointees. Matters of fact, matters of history.
Click to expand...

The impeachment was based on a void argument fallacy. That's a hoax, dude.
The 2nd 'impeachment' never took place. You cannot impeach someone that is not in office. That's a hoax too, dude.
 
Taichiliberal said:
All you do is just parrot the same old disproved talking points. Here are the facts: https://www.politico.com/blogs/2016...et-it-right-on-clintons-email-deletion-229469

Your last sentence is a joke in lieu of the chronology of the posts, So far, neither you or your compadres have refuted, disproved or debunked one item from the OP. You do that with contrary facts and discussion based on those facts, NOT talking points, supposition and conjecture like you do. Now, run-a-long and have the guy you see in the mirror justify everything you say.
Click to expand...

Attempted force of negative proof fallacy. Repetition fallacy. Learn what 'fact' means.
 
floridafan said:
Never forget that in our lifetime there has never been a more corrupt administration, a more corrupt family than what the Trumps gave us. Here was a man who was only going to hire the best, here was a man who promised to drain the swamp, but turned it into a lake.
Click to expand...

The 'lake' is DEMOCRATS, dumbass.
You misspelled 'Biden' again.
 
Truth Detector said:
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal View Post
Please get a nearby adult to explain to you how to properly apply the word "projection" here, because in the immediate previous post I'm pointing out the insipid stubbornness and stupidity of folks of your mindset. A "projection" on my part would mean that I'm am against the very OP I created. Sorry son, but the chronology of the posts shows that I'm doing nothing of the sort.

Try again.
Click to expand...



Run along you brain dead hack. I wish you could buy some self-awareness. Really I do. :palm:
Click to expand...

translation: TD has been (once again) caught flat footed in his ignorant use of language. So in usual MAGA minion fashion, he stamps his widdle feet, fumes and fusses.
 
Truth Detector said:
You constructed a strawman halfwit.



Those impeachments were a farce, you dumb hack. Which is why there was never going to be a conviction. The abuse of the impeachment process was despicable and a moronic act that only Democrats could come up with. Much like the Jan 6th inquisition. If you had a brain and weren't a dishonest low IQ triggered hack, you could comprehend the obvious.
Click to expand...

Again, a intellectually challenged MAGA troll response: mischaracterization of a conversation based on ill use of language. Sorry toodles, but the chronology of the posts won't support your dodges and revisionism (which appeals only to equally dim MAGA mooks like yourself). YOU put forth the premise, I am merely asking do you include the chief legal Trump appointed personna in that premise? If you don't have the intellectual maturity to answer, just say "I decline to answer" and save yourself time and effort..and the rest of us the tedium of reading your drivel.

Oh, and your "it's a hoax" response regarding the impeachments has all the validity of a Trump declaration (of which you just parrot). And it seems you don't have the intellectual courage or honesty to admit to the abject failure regarding the GOP attempts to trash Hillary (not my favorite person, but fair is fair). You need to grow up and get another part time gig, my troll-ish friend, because you suck at this.
 
Truth Detector said:
Politico???? :laugh: More evidence of what a dumb triggered, lying hack you are.



Because you say so. Yet your posts are laughably stupid and filled with bullshit. You're the definition of stupid hack.



Yes, we have. So far you have deflected, flailed, cried like a whiny douchebag and made more lie filled stupid claims.
Click to expand...


So all you've got is just a lot of generalized denials, gain sayings and basic MAGA troll blather. Neither you or your dim witted compadres can logically or factually disprove USING VALID, DOCUMENTED SOURCES AND FACT any point in the OP.

Now, just continue to blather more of the SOS you have been.
 
SmarterthanYou said:
based on the limited information i've read, he most likely broke that law which means that he really doesn't know more about the law than anyone else, trust him.
Click to expand...


What's that?!!? You mean the Orange God you voted for and supported every freaking platform that he and his cronies put forth and argued DOESN'T KNOW BASIC LAWS OF THE LAND?

Turn in your MAGA hat, son. Oh that's right...since Jan. 6th you deny EVERYTHING. Carry on. ;)
 
Taichiliberal said:
What's that?!!? You mean the Orange God you voted for and supported every freaking platform that he and his cronies put forth and argued DOESN'T KNOW BASIC LAWS OF THE LAND?

Turn in your MAGA hat, son. Oh that's right...since Jan. 6th you deny EVERYTHING. Carry on. ;)
Click to expand...

it's almost cute how everyone has to insist I voted for trump, with absolutely zero evidence. you low IQ lefties really don't know how to think for yourselves at all, do you?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top