Abortion: wrong or just sort of wrong?

That wasn't the question asked, now was it.





Please do tax your cognitive skills and try to keep up; but that would mean you would have to actually read ALL of the posts and understand the conversations, along with it's different sub-categories. :palm:

I know what the question was. Your answer was that anything containing human dna is a human which would mean all human cells are a human. It's a stupid answer.
 
Also, if you think a zygote is "human," then you think a blood cell is "human."

What you want to go for is this - is it A human? Or is it just human? If it's the latter, than every skin cell we lose is sacred...

did you just demonstrate that you aren't sentient?.......a blood cell is not an organism.........that conversation is over......you lost......

is a zygote A human......yes.....because it is not A zebra.....or A pumpkin...........
 
Sf, pmp and ila are all shifting themselves over Neil de grasse Tyson. First they have to fear getting their ass whipped by skinny teenagers in the street and now this guy proves them all to be science denying morons.

lol.....I just got Sun Devil to realize he'd been a science denying moron and now you want to volunteer to take his place?......go for it HiggyDiggy.....
 
??...it isn't a species at all.....its just a sperm cell.......oh wait.....you did say "a part of".....maybe you DO realize a sperm cell isn't an organism, but just don't realize you've made a mistake......

What makes the human zygote a member of the human species if the human haploid, sperm/egg, is not?

Why can't we just answer your stupid questions about whether the zygote then is a chicken with your stupid answer of it's not a species at all. You don't have an answer for your own ignorant arguments and seem to think that only you are allowed to shit in the corner.

What is your definition of organism?

You are an idiot that does not understand that definitions are less than perfect attempts to describe and do not control what they attempt to describe. The definition of an organism, life, human and just about everything else contains many shades of gray and things that appear on the border or outside of your pathetic definitions.
 
Last edited:
liberalism is what's no help. You people will throw anything at an argument.

And since you are Republican scum you desperately try to divert attention from and drop the context of the weak argument offered by your side.

The question was, what makes a human a human. USF answered "The dna." If you want to give a different answer to Sun Devil's question then be my guest, but my response is in relation to that not to what you may wish USF would have said.
 
What makes the human zygote a member of the human species if the human haploid, sperm/egg, is not?

because body parts are not organisms.....a zygote is not a body part.....its an organism.....

Why can't we just answer your stupid questions about whether the zygote then is a chicken with your stupid answer of it's not a species at all.
because it would not be accurate.....

What is your definition of organism?

the scientific one....
 
However, when you were arguing about the acorn, the only important thing was that it was "oak," and not "AN oak."

Interesting.

again you miss the point....any acorn or sapling is individually AN oak.....within the species "oak".......a zygote and a teenager are each individually a human, within the species "human"......a sperm cell is never individually a human.....
 
Back
Top