Wrong, Damo
As I told Winter, Your idea of a "homeland" may not be the same as the guy still griping about "northern aggression", or the "indian" who KNOWS his culture and land were all but wiped out and replaced. We may be a united nation, but we sure as hell are NOT a united, homogenous population.
Wrong, Taichi. Your first assumption is that I have lower pigmentation in my skin than another person born here may or may not be true, however that doesn't change that I am as much Native to this land as any other person born here.
If I wanted to be "on par" with Europeans I would simply claim some caucasion heritage from somewhere in Europe. This is just really bad home-grown psychology. Americans couldn't care less about Europe, we hardly read newspapers from Europe written in English, let alone care about how we compare in longevity to Europeans.See, this strikes a nerve because "Americans" want so bad to be on par with Europeans...but in many ways we're not. That was the whole point of setting up this joint in the first place.
No, it isn't. Homeland is where you were born and where you belong, for most pale-skinned Americans, that is here. They were born here, raised here, value this land, and are native to it exactly as native as any other dude born here with darker skin pigmentation.Homeland is a name a homogenous population who are indigenous to a region can use....NOT the descendents of immigrants less than 400 years old. Those immigrants DID NOT assimilate with the native population....period. So like with everything else, they figure they can define whatever they wish and it's fact and law. But as I'm pointing out, that just doesn't bear up under close examination.
Now, if you could find some 15,000 year old "American" that was here before any of us were born, you might have an argument.. However Impermanence has taken hold, the changes are made, and we are Native to this land, not some fictional "homeland" we've no association to.