saltydancin
Verified User
Justices Rule Police Do Not Have a Constitutional Duty to Protect Someone
By Linda Greenhouse
June 28, 2005
WASHINGTON, June 27 - The Supreme Court ruled on Monday that the police did not have a constitutional duty to protect a person from harm, even a woman who had obtained a court-issued protective order against a violent husband making an arrest mandatory for a violation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect.html
----------------------------------
You don't want to talk about the American way of life. Qualified immunity was first introduced in 1967 during the civil rights movement. That means any cop can violate our constitutional rights with impunity. We may as well wipe our ass with the constitution.
In their Christiananality pedophilia national Islamidiotocracy religion of "serve the Pope or die" where thieving US Constitution arsonists are granted standing for Mengele "Angel of Death" WW II baptize thine eyes by urinations by Federal Lynching KKK churchstate of hate fiefdom enforcement to maintain Islam "death to the infidels" with qualified immunity so suicidal super egos sociopsychopathilogical homicidal human farming is law of the land.