Why do right-wingers also object to equal protection of our own laws?
Give me an example!
Why do right-wingers also object to equal protection of our own laws?
At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."Give me an example!
At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."
I don't know. Why is it soo difficult for the right-wing to abolish their fascist, inequality in the protection of our own laws?Is that racist?
I don't know. Why is it soo difficult for the right-wing to abolish their fascist, inequality in the protection of our own laws?
Why are a high percentage of right-wingers white, expecting privilege for simply being on the right-wing, instead actually being Right?
Are you on the right-wing?
I don't know. Why is it soo difficult for the right-wing to abolish their fascist, inequality in the protection of our own laws?
that sounds like something the right-wing is Best at. go figure.Are you on your meds?
half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person
I can't get upset with women wanting to get heterosexual in modern times.
Of course. How much say may depend on the couple.Do you think men should get a say whether or not a woman aborts their child? If the man is the father ?
Of course. How much say may depend on the couple.
I would agree with you, ceteris paribus; but, there may be extenuating circumstances in any given situation.Wrong, that is not equal protection! He gets a say, you can't pick and choose, and stay true to your argument! Should he be able to tell her to have said child if he wants that child?
At-will employment is generally described as follows: "any hiring is presumed to be 'at will'; that is, the employer is free to discharge individuals 'for good cause, or bad cause, or no cause at all,' and the employee is equally free to quit, strike, or otherwise cease work."
^Dumb thread troll doesn't know the difference between the statement "no such laws" and "actual laws".
Dipshit
noun
dip·shit | \ ˈdip-ˌshit \
usually vulgar
: a stupid or incompetent person
So only private schools provide a quality education?
Do you have any evidence that ONLY white children attend private schools?
I've made no such claim.
obtuse
ob·tuse | \ äb-ˈtüs , əb-, -ˈtyüs \
obtuser; obtusest
1 formal : stupid or unintelligent : not able to think clearly or to understand what is obvious or simple
He is too obtuse to take a hint.
an incredibly obtuse person
moron
noun
mo·ron | \ ˈmȯr-ˌän \
1: a foolish or stupid person
Address the topic, not other posters.
Follow your own advice you brain dead, low IQ, hypocritical thread trolling jackass.
moron
noun
mo·ron | \ ˈmȯr-ˌän \
1: a foolish or stupid person