evince
Truthmatters
It wouldn't feel right to have some guy, even a friend, pay for your vacations year after year.
That's something one only does for a mistress, assuming they have one.
It would take a complete lack of morals
It wouldn't feel right to have some guy, even a friend, pay for your vacations year after year.
That's something one only does for a mistress, assuming they have one.
Admittedly on a much, much smaller scale, although it's the same principle, I,
for most of my life,
owned a big beach house to which I invited many friends who did not own beach houses.
I paid for the steaks. I paid for the wine and liquor.
Did my friends do anything wrong accepting my invitations?
What if some of them had higher management jobs at work
and were people to whom I, as a union rep, may have presented grievances from time to time?
What is some of them invited me?
People sell out for money, not hospitality.
Hospitality is merely being civilized to the extent that one can.
Not all. Did you notice he was not indicted for those alleged crimes? What do you call it if someone is never indicted?
If is not necessary to be indicted in order to be impeached. Did you notice that it was the 11th circuit panel, meaning it was fellow justices?
Hastings was found not quilty by an impartial court system
I really wish the senate would have waited a couple of days to see the court results
Don’t you?
Admittedly on a much, much smaller scale, although it's the same principle, I,
for most of my life,
owned a big beach house to which I invited many friends who did not own beach houses.
I paid for the steaks. I paid for the wine and liquor.
Did my friends do anything wrong accepting my invitations?
What if some of them had higher management jobs at work
and were people to whom I, as a union rep, may have presented grievances from time to time?
What is some of them invited me?
People sell out for money, not hospitality.
Hospitality is merely being civilized to the extent that one can.
If is not necessary to be indicted in order to be impeached. Did you notice that it was the 11th circuit panel, meaning it was fellow justices?
Admittedly on a much, much smaller scale, although it's the same principle, I,
for most of my life,
owned a big beach house to which I invited many friends who did not own beach houses.
I paid for the steaks. I paid for the wine and liquor.
Did my friends do anything wrong accepting my invitations?
What if some of them had higher management jobs at work
and were people to whom I, as a union rep, may have presented grievances from time to time?
What is some of them invited me?
People sell out for money, not hospitality.
Hospitality is merely being civilized to the extent that one can.
Thomas, a conservative who joined the nation's highest court in 1991 and is currently the longest-serving member, has accepted the trips from real estate magnate and Republican donor Harlan Crow nearly every year for more than two decades, ProPublica reported, citing flight records, internal documents, and interviews.
Crow, in a statement to ProPublica, said he has been friends with Thomas and his wife, Ginni, since 1996 and said: "The hospitality we have extended to the Thomas's over the years is no different from the hospitality we have extended to our many other dear friends."
According to the report, Thomas has vacationed with Crow on his 162-foot yacht around the world, flown around on Crow's Bombardier Global 5000 jet, and stayed at his private resort in the Adirondacks almost every summer.
Ethics experts and former and current judges that ProPublica spoke with said Thomas violated the normal conduct of judges by accepting such trips and may have violated the law by failing to disclose them on his annual financial records.
The bombshell report comes as the Supreme Court has been under increased scrutiny over ethics concerns. Critics have called for the justices to adopt an enforceable code of conduct and to be subject to stricter financial reporting rules.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...G?cvid=4b445e8848144b5dba632a0b399aebab&ei=41
Then he can hold office if it was not a part of his conviction. It really has nothing to do with his actions as a judge. Democrats voted to remove him from his judgeship.
The House voted 413-3 to impeach.
How would the vote have gone down after all the voters knew a court found him innocent?
I mentioned this in the other thread, but it bears repeating. I was a VP with a large corporation and was the decision maker for a pretty significant budget. I was not allowed to accept anything of value over $25 from anyone who could potentially do business with the company. I understood and abided by that decision. That means vendors couldn't pick up my check for a meal, or for a bar tab. Could I go to a hospitality suite at a conference? Sure could. Could they take me on a vacation or put me up in a hotel room? Not a chance.
Without knowing he was acquitted by our justice system
I mentioned this in the other thread, but it bears repeating. I was a VP with a large corporation and was the decision maker for a pretty significant budget. I was not allowed to accept anything of value over $25 from anyone who could potentially do business with the company. I understood and abided by that decision. That means vendors couldn't pick up my check for a meal, or for a bar tab. Could I go to a hospitality suite at a conference? Sure could. Could they take me on a vacation or put me up in a hotel room? Not a chance.