Light is not heat. That does not violate the Stefan-Boltzmann law. You have already tried to modify the Stefan-Boltzmann several times an still call it the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
So where is the additional energy coming from?
What 'increase in absorbed radiation'???!?
You cannot trap heat. You cannot trap light. You cannot trap thermal energy. You are ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics.
You cannot blame YOUR problem on me or anybody else.
You don't get to speak for the dead, Poorboy.
Yes there does.
You cannot trap light.
So...how are you measuring the temperature of the Earth? What about asphalt in the shade of a tree or building?
Someday you'll learn what emissivity is.
Never said any such thing.
That is YOUR problem. You cannot blame YOUR problem on me or anybody else.
Heat is never transferred. Heat is not contained in anything. Learn what 'heat' means.
Paradox. Irrational. You cannot argue both sides of a paradox.
You want to try to learn Fourier's law now?
No. It's explained by Fourier's law.
You are trying to make it just that.
And you are trying to heat a warmer surface using a colder gas. Not possible, Poorboy.
You can't.
Nope. You cannot create energy from nothing.
The atmosphere is colder than the surface. You cannot heat a warmer surface using a colder gas.
Conductive heat is not radiant heat. The Sun does not heat the Earth using conductive heat.
Only for conductive heat. The Sun does not heat the Earth by conductive heat. False equivalence fallacy.
The emissivity of Earth is unknown. It cannot be measured.
Science is not a website. False authority fallacy. This diagram is wrong.
Idiot.
This is just one of too many reasons to list, why nobody takes you or your science bloviation seriously.
https://letstalkscience.ca/educational-resources/backgrounders/introduction-heat-transfer
Dumbass.
I see you failed to address the issue of specific heat of CO2 which allows for a higher temperature with no increase in energy.
Who should we believe? You or Steven Hawking?
Says the long-winded troll who denies that there is a science of paleoclimatology.
Says the extremely long-winded troll who claims that Sweden is not to the east of the UK
This one is pretty funny since you have just violated Stefan-Boltzmann law which says all black bodies radiate electromagnetic radiation. The earth as a grey body must also radiate electromagnetic radiation. To fail to radiate would be a violation of the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The Stefan-Boltzmann law also says that if the temperature of the earth changes then the radiation must also change. But here you are claiming the earth doesn't radiate because light can't be trapped. Thanks for showing everyone how little you really know about anything.
It seems you don't understand how the energy in radiation works. Do you understand what a shadow is? I'll bet not since your head is a black hole that repels any knowledge.
I guess you have never been out at dusk. They are not all the same temperature the minute the sun goes down. It seems you want to violate Fourier's law.
And you will never learn what an emissivity coefficient is because of that black hole in your head repelling all knowledge.
I see you live in the world where furnaces and refrigerators don't function.
I am curious how this is a paradox. Clearly you have never cooked anything since it is possible to cook something in a pan on the stove and get it to 300 degrees and then transfer the pan to an oven at 150 to keep it warm for a period of time.
So your argument is that the 2nd law has nothing to do with the transfer of thermal energy from a higher state region to a lower state region? Thanks for showing you don't understand the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Fourier's law helps to define how the entropy happens but it is still entropy even if Fourier's law can be applied.
And here you are denying that the earth gets 1380 joules per meter squared per second from the sun.
Look at you. Bringing up Fourier's law and then completely ignoring it. The rate of transfer is proportional to the negative temperature gradient. A warmer atmosphere means the earth's surface will not cool as quickly overnight.
Lovely strawman. I never said that the sun uses conductive heat to heat the earth. But it seems you are simply ignoring Stefan-Boltzmann yet again which says that ALL objects radiate. The type of thermal transfer doesn't change the joules required to raise the temperature of an element. It only affects how efficient that transfer might be. (Stefan-Boltzmann again.)
Your ignorance doesn't trump what science can calculate.
Lashing out a bit, are we? But then again, liberals ARE typically much angrier people than conservatives. Have fun with your little meltdown. Let me know when you've regained your composure.
Correct, but there DOES need to be additional energy coming from SOMEWHERE in order to increase Earth's temperature. Where is that additional energy coming from?
Who says that Earth's radiation is changing? Where can I see for myself the valid dataset that supports this notion?
Oh Lordie, here we go again.......
Okay.
Because they are each unique parts within a whole (the Earth). It doesn't matter how you wish to redistribute the sun's energy within the whole; it's still the same amount of energy in total. This is what IBDaMann has been so eloquently trying to explain to you. I've done it in the past using the example of "baskets of apples".
I have never asserted any such thing. Quit being dishonest.
This is YOUR issue, dude, not mine. Heat is NOT transferred. You still haven't learned what heat is.
Yet, you're still trying to make it into one......
Yet, you're still trying to heat a WARMER surface using a COLDER gas.
Continued denial of the 1st LoT. You cannot create energy from nothing.
??????? Ummmmmm, the atmosphere is COLDER than the surface is..........
Irrelevant. Conductive heat is not radiant heat.
A made-up number. Meh. Earth's emissivity is an unknown value. Earth's temperature is an unknown value. You cannot redistribute thermal energy within Earth in order to increase Earth's temperature.
You seem to be completely unfamiliar with radiant heat or the fact that light is energy that can be transformed to other forms of energy.
It's called the sun. You might want to go outside during the day some time and look up at the sky. We get energy from the sun every day. The earth as a whole is always getting energy from the sun. If the earth no longer radiates the same energy it is getting from the sun then the earth has to warm or it would violate the 1st law of thermodynamics.
Buzzword fallacy
It seems you don't know anything about spectroscopy after all. CO2 doesn't absorb the same wavelengths as O2 does. If you increase the amount of CO2 in a gas mixture, you change which wavelengths are absorbed. It's simple physics.
Existing energy is not additional energy, dumbass. Try again. Where is the ADDITIONAL energy coming from that is required to increase Earth's temperature?
I never said you couldn't find equally ignorant 7th-graders on the internet. Heck, we've got you here on JPP. Citing other erroneous information from the internet doesn't make you correct; it reveals you for not being able to filter the correct from the incorrect, and that you are one of those scientifically illiterate morons who believes that everything he reads on the internet is TRUE.
Do you know what the sun is? Do you know that we get energy from the sun every day? Until you understand that, there isn't much to discuss because you are just in denial about something man has been aware of for millennia.
There you go. Tipping your king as usual.
I see you just pivoted to get out of everything I wrote.
Your statement shows that you have no idea what "heat" is.
You were going there. I just openend the door for you, as a courtesy.
What did I say.
There's no reason any rational adult would have to believe either that the atmosphere is egregiously violating the 2nd LoT in that way, or that you (or any human for that matter) has ever know the average global equilibrium temperature of the earth.
Nonsequitur. Bizarre, in fact.
You are supposed to be explaining your apparently bogus position, not stalling for time by assigning bogus positions to me.
