Climate change is pure bullshit!!

[IBDaMann]

For fucks sake, why would I fucking do THAT? I would NEVER be such a piss-ass buttwipe as to descend to the mommy's basement level of that dumb-ass donkey dick furniture-reamed doh-tard of a dog-faced-pony-soldier known as Nomad... NEVER!

Well played.

 

[moon]

The good news is that you no longer have to prove that you are logically inept. You have long-since established that beyond any doubt. If you are trying to establish that you also cannot distinguish between different people, I'll see about getting that stipulated as well.

Hey, I'm here for you. Have a wonderful day.

Desperate corn

You've blabbered yourself into obscurity, socko.

Haw, haw......................................haw.

 

[IBDaMann]

Desperate corn

What?

You've blabbered yourself into obscurity, socko.

... you say this as you respond to me. Hmmmmmm.

 

[Nomad]

Desperate corn

You've blabbered yourself into obscurity, socko.

Haw, haw......................................haw.

His tactic is to hump someone's leg, spout irrelevant nonsense and hurl insults, all while thumping his flabby, man boob chest about how badly he smacked you down, until the other person just gets bored and ignores him.

Here's IBDaMoron at his office copy room job, having to have a coworker show him why the copier wasn't working...

After which he'll go marching around the office boasting about how his math and science skills allowed him to repair the copy machine which was so badly broken that if he hadn't fixed it, the company would've had to buy a new one.

And of course, as always, everyone will laugh at him behind his back.

 

[gfm7175]

What?

... you say this as you respond to me. Hmmmmmm.

I'd say that you could call a good chunk of the corn out in my neck of the woods "desperate corn" ...

Too much rain = flooded fields = dead or otherwise "desperate" corn.

 

[IBDaMann]

I'd say that you could call a good chunk of the corn out in my neck of the woods "desperate corn" ...

Too much rain = flooded fields = dead or otherwise "desperate" corn.

Desperate Corn = Climate increasing precipitation to make things WORSE.
Desperate Pomegranate = Climate decreasing precipitation to make things WORSE.

 

[Nomad]

For fucks sake, why would I fucking do THAT? I would NEVER be such a piss-ass buttwipe as to descend to the mommy's basement level of that dumb-ass donkey dick furniture-reamed doh-tard of a dog-faced-pony-soldier known as Nomad...

NEVER!

You're never going to say anything remotely intelligent or interesting either.

 

[IBDaMann]

His tactic is to hump someone's leg, spout irrelevant nonsense and hurl insults, all while thumping his flabby, man boob chest about how badly he smacked you down, until the other person just gets bored and ignores him.

After which he'll go marching around the office boasting about how his math and science skills allowed him to repair the copy machine which was so badly broken that if he hadn't fixed it, the company would've had to buy a new one.

And of course, as always, everyone will laugh at him behind his back.

@gfm7175 - someone is projecting. If you had to guess about Nomad's appearance, social standing and past experience with copiers, on what would you place your money?

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

The 1st law of thermodynamics that you are ignoring is not the Stefan-Boltzmann law.
You are also trying to change the equation for the Stefan-Boltzmann law, making it something other than what it is.

You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are still ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

Spectroscopy does not measure temperature, Poorboy.

You cannot blame your problem on me or anybody else, Poorboy.

Let's explain this in simple terms.
Electromagnetic radiation is energy.
Heat transfer occurs with radiation.
Spectroscopy measures the wave lengths at which molecules absorb and radiate electromagnetic energy.
The first law of thermodynamics says that energy can not be created or destroyed but can be transferred.
The atmosphere allows some electromagnetic radiation to pass through it. If it didn't we would not have visible light.
By changing the composition of the atmosphere we know we can change the energy that is absorbed by that atmosphere when electromagnetic radiation passes through it. This is clear because of spectroscopy and also because of Stefan-Bolzmann law which says that different materials have different emissivity coefficients.
The warming of the atmosphere does not violate the first law of thermodynamics. Any claim that the gas can't warm and therefor warm the earth is the violation of the first law. By changing the atmosphere it simply changes the amount of radiation it absorbs which means there is not a violation of the first law.
By changing the atmosphere composition it changes the wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation that is absorbed. To claim it doesn't change the wavelengths absorbed is a violation of Stefan-Bolzmann law.

The result is that the warming of the earth doesn't violate either the first law of thermodynamics of Stefan-Boltzmann law. Any claim that they do violate them is not supported by science.

Global warming can happen because the earth is an open system that gets energy from the sun. To claim that gas can't warm denies the first law of thermodynamics since the earth is an open system with a continuous energy source providing energy to the earth.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Thermal energy is not heat.
Different elements radiate at different wavelengths. That's what makes spectrum analyzers work.

Congratulations, You just proved that a change in the composition of the atmosphere can create an increase in temperature without a change in radiation received from the sun.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Maybe Moon meant disparate corn...

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Emissivity does not have a 'materials' factor. You cannot add one. RQAA. Stop repeating your question over and over mindlessly. I've already answered it and answered it again here.

Thanks for proving you don't know what you are talking about since your next post confirms that different molecules have different radiation wavelengths.

 

[Into the Night]

Let's explain this in simple terms.
Electromagnetic radiation is energy.
Heat transfer occurs with radiation.

Light is not heat.

Spectroscopy measures the wave lengths at which molecules absorb and radiate electromagnetic energy.

So?

The first law of thermodynamics says that energy can not be created or destroyed but can be transferred.

I think what you are looking for is the word 'converted'.

The atmosphere allows some electromagnetic radiation to pass through it. If it didn't we would not have visible light.
By changing the composition of the atmosphere we know we can change the energy that is absorbed by that atmosphere when electromagnetic radiation passes through it. This is clear because of spectroscopy and also because of Stefan-Bolzmann law which says that different materials have different emissivity coefficients.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not talk about conversion of light to thermal energy, Poorboy. You are denying that theory of science again.

The warming of the atmosphere does not violate the first law of thermodynamics.

Assuming the same sun output, where is the additional energy coming from?

Any claim that the gas can't warm and therefor warm the earth is the violation of the first law.

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are denying the 1st law of thermodynamics again.

By changing the atmosphere it simply changes the amount of radiation it absorbs which means there is not a violation of the first law.

There is no 'materials' factor in the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and it doesn't discuss absorption of light.

By changing the atmosphere composition it changes the wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation that is absorbed. To claim it doesn't change the wavelengths absorbed is a violation of Stefan-Bolzmann law.

There is no frequency term in the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not discuss absorption of light.

The result is that the warming of the earth doesn't violate either the first law of thermodynamics of Stefan-Boltzmann law. Any claim that they do violate them is not supported by science.

You just denied the 1st law of thermodynamics again and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. You are denying theories of science.

Global warming can happen because the earth is an open system

The Earth is a closed system. The Sun-Earth-space system is another closed system. You cannot compare two different systems as if they were the same system. False equivalence fallacy.

that gets energy from the sun. To claim that gas can't warm denies the first law of thermodynamics since the earth is an open system with a continuous energy source providing energy to the earth.

You are ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics now. No gas or vapor allows entropy to decrease...ever. You are also denying the Stefan-Boltzmann law by saying the Earth does not radiate light.

 

[Into the Night]

Congratulations, You just proved that a change in the composition of the atmosphere can create an increase in temperature without a change in radiation received from the sun.

I did not falsify any theory of science here, Poorboy. No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You cannot decrease entropy...ever.

* You cannot trap heat.
* You cannot trap light
* You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

 

[Into the Night]

Maybe Moon meant disparate corn...

It really is amazing how many different varieties of corn there is.

 

[Into the Night]

Thanks for proving you don't know what you are talking about since your next post confirms that different molecules have different radiation wavelengths.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law has no frequency term. You cannot add one. You are still denying the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

It really is amazing how many different varieties of corn there is.

Quite disparate, if not desperate...

 

[moon]

Light is not heat.

So?

I think what you are looking for is the word 'converted'.

The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not talk about conversion of light to thermal energy, Poorboy. You are denying that theory of science again.

Assuming the same sun output, where is the additional energy coming from?

No gas or vapor has the capability to warm the Earth. You are denying the 1st law of thermodynamics again.

There is no 'materials' factor in the Stefan-Boltzmann law, and it doesn't discuss absorption of light.

There is no frequency term in the Stefan-Boltzmann law. The Stefan-Boltzmann law does not discuss absorption of light.

You just denied the 1st law of thermodynamics again and the Stefan-Boltzmann law. You are denying theories of science.

The Earth is a closed system. The Sun-Earth-space system is another closed system. You cannot compare two different systems as if they were the same system. False equivalence fallacy.

You are ignoring the 2nd law of thermodynamics now. No gas or vapor allows entropy to decrease...ever. You are also denying the Stefan-Boltzmann law by saying the Earth does not radiate light.

These are ' Into the Nightsoil's statements '

"Sweden is not to the east of the UK "
" There is no such science as paleoclimatology "

Dumbass or troll ?
Both.

 

[moon]

The Stefan-Boltzmann law has no frequency term. You cannot add one. You are still denying the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

These are ' Into the Nightsoil's statements '

"Sweden is not to the east of the UK "
" There is no such science as paleoclimatology "

Dumbass or troll ?
Both.

 

[moon]

I did not falsify any theory of science here, Poorboy. No gas or vapor is capable of warming the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You cannot decrease entropy...ever.

* You cannot trap heat.
* You cannot trap light
* You cannot trap thermal energy. There is always heat.

Hey- Into the Night soil- repeat again that Sweden is not to the east of the UK .


Haw, haw..........................................haw.