None, but that wont stop them for promoting the idea that Democrats are weak for not being able to force something the supporters of the Democratic party want!
So if your choice of canidates who have a chance to win is between someone who promoted and supported and cheered on this war and someone who merely let it happen, you will stay out of it? You wont make at least some effort to depose the one who cheered it?
Maybe, but to me while both are bad, enabling this war is better than promoting it. My whole point is that if we must support the enablers to get rid of the promoters I will do that. Then Ill start consentrating on getting rid of the enablers, but lets get rid of the promoters first.
If we get rid of the enablers and elect the promoters instead, that is 0 progress.
I'm still not getting your argument. If the Republicans don't want the Iraq war to end until they believe it is time why are they publically going to try and mock the Democrats for not ending it?
I'm still not getting your argument. If the Republicans don't want the Iraq war to end until they believe it is time why are they publically going to try and mock the Democrats for not ending it?
So you feel someone who lies to you about their position because they know you disagree with it is better then someone who is honest yet disagree.
I do not see it that way, I dont think Senator Clinton is lying, I think her position is more neuanced than that. When you get right down to it, its in the detales.
I do not belive Senator Clinton would have promoted, started or encouraged this war, clearly she did let it happen... Two different things.
I do belive any of the Republican canidates would have started this war!
They will find a way, backchannels or backhanded comments, noone ever accused the Republicans of being consistant or having integrity.
Either way the Democrats will loose the middle.
And Democrats complain when people call them spineless...
You can't even END a fucking unjust war when such an action has majority support from Americans.
I'm still not getting your argument. If the Republicans don't want the Iraq war to end until they believe it is time why are they publically going to try and mock the Democrats for not ending it?
See my point. They attack the Democrats no matter what.
According to Cypress and others the middle is against this war (only the wing-nuts still support it) and want our soldiers out. So how are the Democrats going to lose the middle by supposedly doing what the people want?
You seem to be so scared of the Republicans that you are afraid to do what you think is right. That's not good.
Yeah... in voting for it, she most certainly couldn't have any responsibility for it.... Bush simply tricked her. Now she votes for a resolution that will allow for an attack upon Iran... but that too is not her fault... that dumb GW obviously tricked her again.
And Democrats complain when people call them spineless...
You can't even END a fucking unjust war when such an action has majority support from Americans.
Why should I vote for someone dumb enough to get fooled by Bush?
I was 15 years old in '03 and even I knew that Bush wanted to invade based on that resolution.
And Democrats don't attack Republicans? Come on man. It's freakin politics.
Keep in mind that the majority of Americans were not as smart as you about that..