Does Winterborn = Solitary?

[DamnYankee]

Its completely relevant, because it proves that you have no idea what the actual measured diameters are.

 

[WinterBorn]

Its completely relevant, because it proves that you have no idea what the actual measured diameters are.

I have listed links of experts stating exactly what the dimensions are. You have offered absolutely no valid evidence whatsoever.

The best you have offered is a vague "My friend the firearms manufacturing engineer said it would blow up".

Come up with some valid evidence or admit you are wrong. Its just that simple.

 

[DamnYankee]

And you claim to have a caliper, presumably used to measure bullets and shit, yet you don't know if its a vernier or a dial type.

A-fucking-amazing.

 

[WinterBorn]

And you claim to have a caliper, presumably used to measure bullets and shit, yet you don't know if its a vernier or a dial type.

A-fucking-amazing.

Still doing the "SM Side-Step"?

The discussion is about the .308 dimensions. Stay with the topic here.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

And you claim to have a caliper, presumably used to measure bullets and shit, yet you don't know if its a vernier or a dial type.

A-fucking-amazing.

And you claim to have a buddy at Remington who sold you a rifle without a FFL, yet you won't post the receipt again?

 

[DamnYankee]

Yes, and on the condition that you blow Solitary if I do.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

So you still claim that you, as a "VIP" bought a rifle from a friend at Remington without an FFL and that friend told you a .308 round would blow up a .308 rifle?

You wrote a check, right?

 

[DamnYankee]

Wrote a check to pay the cc bill.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

Wrote a check to pay the cc bill.

That's not what you said before, is it?

 

[DamnYankee]

I said I wrote a check.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

I said I wrote a check.

You said you wrote a check and picked up the rifle.

In that order.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

Wrote a check to pay the cc bill.

The information that I gave was that I went to the Remington wold headquarters, wrote a check and picked up the item. Any other information that you obtained, perhaps by calling them up and trying to find out who purchased an item recently, was totally on your own. Then you told me that I lied.

Are you willing to put $100 down to bet on it, or will you now admit that you were wrong?

You went to Remington and wrote a check while you were there to pay the CC bill before you picked up the rifle?

 

[DamnYankee]

I was wrong. Are you going to bet?

 

[DamnYankee]

Damo will be the sole judge and you will only see a redacted version of the paper which will clearly indicate "VIP SALES".

.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

.

It's already been proven that documents can be falsified, hasn't it?

So, how would you prove the receipt was real if you bet?

 

[DamnYankee]

Again, Damo would be the sole judge.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

Again, Damo would be the sole judge.

Again, how would you prove the receipt was real if you bet?

BTW, when did you become a betting man?

I'm not a betting man, or claim to be an expert on guns, so no.

Perhaps you can explain to me where the deformed lead goes in Solitary's example, if not causing, what mechanical engineers call "interference fit", which results in seizure.

 

[DamnYankee]

I'm not a betting man, since I only bet on sure things.

For the last time, Damo would be the sole judge of its authenticity. I expect him to judge as in any civil matter, based on the preponderance of evidence.

 

[WinterBorn]

I'm not a betting man, since I only bet on sure things.

For the last time, Damo would be the sole judge of its authenticity. I expect him to judge as in any civil matter, based on the preponderance of evidence.

I guess that explains why you won't bet on whether the .308 Win specs are what I have claimed they are. The preponderance of evidence backs my claim.

 

[Dumn Yankee]

I'm not a betting man, since I only bet on sure things.

For the last time, Damo would be the sole judge of its authenticity. I expect him to judge as in any civil matter, based on the preponderance of evidence.

If you won't bet when others set the conditions, why should anyone bet when you set them?

How would you prove the receipt is real?