Edwards gives the speech of a Lifetime...

duhla, it's way over your head too. In economic terms you are a moron.
You feel the Jimmy Carter lines of the 70's are the way to go.
Wrong answer
 
Topspin said:
duhla, it's way over your head too. In economic terms you are a moron.
You feel the Jimmy Carter lines of the 70's are the way to go.
Wrong answer
Click to expand...

I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a holy roller on record as being against birth control is put in charge of women's reproductive health, there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a lobbyist for the coal industry is put in charge of the agency that regulates coal mining there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a top attorney of choice for the pharmacutical industry is made chief counsel for the FDA and makes the historic move of helping the pharmacutical industry avoid lawsuits, there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when lifetime business lobbyists are put in top positions in the department of labor, and the department of labor, for the first time in its history, becomes an advocate for business rather than the lowly worker, someone is getting screwed and maybe it's because there is a conflict of interest.

In other words, I'm just smart enough to be smarter than you topper.
 
Darla said:
I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a holy roller on record as being against birth control is put in charge of women's reproductive health, there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a lobbyist for the coal industry is put in charge of the agency that regulates coal mining there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when a top attorney of choice for the pharmacutical industry is made chief counsel for the FDA and makes the historic move of helping the pharmacutical industry avoid lawsuits, there is a conflict of interest. I guess I'm just smart enough to know that when lifetime business lobbyists are put in top positions in the department of labor, and the department of labor, for the first time in its history, becomes an advocate for business rather than the lowly worker, someone is getting screwed and maybe it's because there is a conflict of interest.

In other words, I'm just smart enough to be smarter than you topper.
Click to expand...

heck I am smarter than topper , Just not techically as eddicated.
 
RStringfield said:
Do you assume that the law is the definition of proper or moral action?

I did not say he broke any law, so I fail to see your point.



What charitable work? The organization is little more than an extension of his campaign. It's primary purpose was political.



Ummmm, your side is the one that continues to present this charlatan as some sort of moral and virtuous man, sincerely concerned with the poor.
Click to expand...


Rstringfield,

No disrespect, but I'm pretty much done with taking the word of Anti-Democratic partisans, on the alleged improprieties of Democratic candidates. Kerry got swiftboated, Gore got called a serial liar. Both times, it was all a pack of lies intended to smear the candidates and distract from the real issues.

I see the same thing happening here. No one wants to talk about edwards positions. They want to talk about whether rich people have a right to talk about poverty, or whether he or his staff drew salaries from tax exempt charities.

I'm looking at the totality of his life history. And I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing a devious, plutocrat like you are. ;)
 
Cypress said:
Rstringfield,

No disrespect, but I'm pretty much done with taking the word of Anti-Democratic partisans, on the alleged improprieties of Democratic candidates. Kerry got swiftboated, Gore got called a serial liar. Both times, it was all a pack of lies intended to smear the candidates and distract from the real issues.

I see the same thing happening here. No one wants to talk about edwards positions. They want to talk about whether rich people have a right to talk about poverty, or whether he or his staff drew salaries from tax exempt charities.

I'm looking at the totality of his life history. And I'm sorry, but I'm just not seeing a devious, plutocrat like you are. ;)
Click to expand...

I don't think that children should go to bed hungry tonight.

And I ate breakfast. I hate myself, I'm such a "hypocrite".
 
Duhla, I'm sure your liberal arts AA from your local community college really has you feeling fullfilled.
So you spewed out some bush hate, had nothing to do with energy I might add.
Your confidence is charming, though misplaced:clink:
 
Topspin said:
Duhla, I'm sure your liberal arts AA from your local community college really has you feeling fullfilled.
So you spewed out some bush hate, had nothing to do with energy I might add.
Your confidence is charming, though misplaced:clink:
Click to expand...

Of course it has to do with energy. Every example I gave is a real example, and far from a complete list, of appointments bush has made where he has put the fox in charge of the henhouse, clear conflicts of interest, and the energy policy is no different. There is a reason that Cheney threw his lard ass across his door and bellowed "Over My Dead Body" when non-partisan organizations wanted to see the notes of who attended his energy policy meetings. IN other words, of just who wrote AMERICA'S energy policy. America, as in, We The People, dipshit.

And don't worry about where I got my degree Top, or what kind it is. Luckily for me I am not so insecure that I have to state it on a message board.
 
Darla said:
Of course it has to do with energy. Every example I gave is a real example, and far from a complete list, of appointments bush has made where he has put the fox in charge of the henhouse, clear conflicts of interest, and the energy policy is no different. There is a reason that Cheney threw his lard ass across his door and bellowed "Over My Dead Body" when non-partisan organizations wanted to see the notes of who attended his energy policy meetings. IN other words, of just who wrote AMERICA'S energy policy. America, as in, We The People, dipshit.

And don't worry about where I got my degree Top, or what kind it is. Luckily for me I am not so insecure that I have to state it on a message board.
Click to expand...


topspin owned. :clink:
 
cypress you know better
Bush and Cheney have been all for increasing production which lowers price.
Morons on the left have fought it at every pass.
It uneducated and goofy partisan to argue otherwise.
Duhla & girlyman castro BURNED!!!!
 
Topspin said:
cypress you know better
Bush and Cheney have been all for increasing production which lowers price.
Morons on the left have fought it at every pass.
It uneducated and goofy partisan to argue otherwise.
Duhla & girlyman castro BURNED!!!!
Click to expand...

Umm what about the war premium on oil ?
and the record profits of the oil cos ?
Not to mention how much oil the war us using.
 
Topspin said:
cypress you know better
Bush and Cheney have been all for increasing production which lowers price.
Morons on the left have fought it at every pass.
It uneducated and goofy partisan to argue otherwise.
Duhla & girlyman castro BURNED!!!!
Click to expand...


Topper, I haven't heard anyone use "burn" since 8th grade. You cajuns need to move into the 21st century. ;)

Second, where did I say anthing about oil and gas, or production? I've got nothing against domestic production of oil and gas. Its just not a realistic long term solution, and in fact has a neglibible effect on prices. OPEC controls oil prices. Not west texas crude.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top