Exactly how can you say people are Liberals, just like that?

Into the Night said:
A liberal (classic or contemporary) has never supported liberty. That's not what 'liberal' has ever meant. Liberals are called that because they support liberal application of law and policies to achieve their ends.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh, yeah, that's not the way I was taught in school. You do make a good case there, though (and in your extended commentary about it). I see what you're arguing, and it has convinced me to change my view on that bit.
 
Into the Night said:
Whath abouth conthervithivths with a lithp?
Click to expand...

:)

I do realize that it's just a generalization based on personal experience, and wouldn't ever go as far as to claim "yup, 100% a liberal"... Same with someone being black, or bumper stickers all over their vehicle, or whatever else... From my personal experiences, those have been indicators of spotting a liberal without speaking with them in any way. The OP seemed to be asking "from perception", which doesn't involve speaking with them in any way, which leads to assumption-making, which has issues...

To properly identify a liberal simply by speaking with them for a little while, one needs to only see whether they follow the teachings of Karl Marx or not...
 
CharacterAssassin said:
No, it's not bribery, nor can you demonstrate that it is. You simply whining that it is won't magically make it so, and there are no constitutionalist republicans, you simpleton.
Click to expand...

The evidence is welfare folks who vote, vote for leftist. Leftist use taxpayer’s money to support the welfare system. “DEMONSTRATION COMPLETE!!!!!”

This 'god' you reference is so weak, so puny, that it can be 'banned' by liberals from public schools? Really, Cindy? Just shows your rank stupidity and hatred of such a being.
Click to expand...

I simply look at nature and see God, the willfully blind have no such talent. To the blind, nature is an accident. ONE HELL OF AN ACCIDENT!!!!!

Irrelevant. Espousing any such being in a public school is a gov't affirmation of religion,
Click to expand...

And espousing evolution in a public school is no less a government affirmation of a religion, both espouse the genesis of life. One has no more evidence than the other. Both are held to with adore and faith. Both are the definition of religion.

which is a decrease in liberty, and the Big Bang isn't a faith, you simpering moron. My argument remains unchallenged by your caterwalling.
Click to expand...

A decrease in liberty is the denial of actions by a governing power without rational purpose and without a protection of somebody’s inalienable rights. A practicing and teaching of a religion violates nobody’s rights, especially if it’s taught as an unproven but possible theory just like evolution.

The Drug War is unconstitutional, in my opinion it is a creation of conservatives and the only reason it was implemented was Nixon wanted to use it against his political enemies. You haven't a single fucking clue what you're talking about, yet again.
Click to expand...

Of course that’s your opinion, you’re a partisan leftist. You have no rational political opinions about anything. Leftist are always in perpetual denial. But the facts are Nixon’s War On Drugs could have never happened without the support of Democrats. It could never still be in effect without the support and prosecution of both Republican and Democrat Administrations and Congresses.


Man made Global Warming Isn’t science.” It’s socialist communist anti-capitalist propaganda preached by a cult of leftist zombis.

LOL! You lack the requisite intelligence to even begin to know what it is. Have your parole officer explain 'communism' to you, child.

When I'm not addressing an adult, but rather a whining, pig-ignorant troll like you? That's an odd thing to complain about.
Click to expand...

A typical response of blather and childish insults and unfounded accusations from the intellectually challenged left. No surprise about that, that’s exactly your mental ability.
 
Robo said:
The evidence is welfare folks who vote, vote for leftist. Leftist use taxpayer’s money to support the welfare system. “DEMONSTRATION COMPLETE!!!!!”
Click to expand...

LOL! No, that's just you projecting your need for them to be voting that way, silly whore. You actually have no idea why they vote how they vote, so you ascribe to them motives you cannot substantiate. You're not fooling anyone but yourself here.
I simply look at nature and see God, the willfully blind have no such talent. To the blind, nature is an accident. ONE HELL OF AN ACCIDENT!!!!!
Click to expand...

No, you simply look at nature and attribute it to god. Those unable to understand the world around them and engage in abstract thinking and logic have to ability to do otherwise. To simpletons like that, invisible magic controls the universe.
And espousing evolution in a public school is no less a government affirmation of a religion, both espouse the genesis of life. One has no more evidence than the other. Both are held to with adore and faith. Both are the definition of religion.
Click to expand...

Evolution isn't a religion, silly whore, and has nothing, whatsoever, to do with the genesis of life. That would be Abiogenesis. That you don't know something even that simple merely shows your laughable pig-ignorance on the matter and explains why you need to lie so often. Evolution has evidence. Religion has none. Zero. Nor can you provide any.
A decrease in liberty is the denial of actions by a governing power without rational purpose and without a protection of somebody’s inalienable rights. A practicing and teaching of a religion violates nobody’s rights, especially if it’s taught as an unproven but possible theory just like evolution.
Click to expand...

Irrelevant to the fact that gov't sponsorship is an abrogation/curtailment of rights no matter how hard you cry. No one in school is being prohibited from practicing their religion, dunce.
Of course that’s your opinion, you’re a partisan leftist. You have no rational political opinions about anything. Leftist are always in perpetual denial. But the facts are Nixon’s War On Drugs could have never happened without the support of Democrats. It could never still be in effect without the support and prosecution of both Republican and Democrat Administrations and Congresses.
Click to expand...

LOL! Cindy, you wouldn't know logic and reason is they were fucking you up the ass. You're a Marxist and as such are permanently blind to reality.

The fact is the WOD is wholly a creation of conservatives, no matter how much you need that not to be the case. Whether dems went along with at various point is irrelevant to who created it.
A typical response of blather and childish insults and unfounded accusations from the intellectually challenged left. No surprise about that, that’s exactly your mental ability.
Click to expand...

LOL! Says the idiot who doesn't understand the meaning of the words 'socialist', 'communist' and 'anti-capitalist' and cannot demonstrate how the concept of man-made global warming somehow, magically involves them.

Sorry I put my boot so far up your ass. Even sorry that you love it and are compelled to keep coming back for more.
 
gfm7175 said:
:)

I do realize that it's just a generalization based on personal experience, and wouldn't ever go as far as to claim "yup, 100% a liberal"... Same with someone being black, or bumper stickers all over their vehicle, or whatever else... From my personal experiences, those have been indicators of spotting a liberal without speaking with them in any way. The OP seemed to be asking "from perception", which doesn't involve speaking with them in any way, which leads to assumption-making, which has issues...

To properly identify a liberal simply by speaking with them for a little while, one needs to only see whether they follow the teachings of Karl Marx or not...
Click to expand...

That's right. Many of them deny it of course, like StoneByStone does. They know that the Marxism label is tainted.
 
Into the Night said:
WRONG. They are opposites of each other!

WRONG. Fascism IS liberalism.

Fascism IS socialism. It is the liberal mindset.

Fascism isn't symptoms. It is a form of economic control by government.

Bigotry. Fallacy fallacy. Trump isn't racist. Neither are most of his followers (although some are).
Click to expand...
Just contradicting fact is not argument, child. You'll have to get better than that if you want a turn licking Trumpf's arse.
 
Into the Night said:
Since you have done so, I will call you a racist as well. A compositional error is a fallacy. If the error involves people as the class, that is bigotry. If the element used is a physical trait, that is racism. You have done both. You are racist.
Click to expand...

There are no races other than the human, child. Racists are idiots, like people who believe the world is flat.
 
Into the Night said:
You don't know what brainwashing is. Buzzword fallacy. Insult fallacy.

Bigotry.

Redefinition fallacy (socialism <-> capitalism). Redefinition fallacy (void -> capitalist government). There is no such thing as a 'capitalist government'. Bigotry. Not all leaders in government are thieves.
Click to expand...

Child, one only has to read a sentence of yours to know what brainwashing is, you poor robot. The rest of your scribble is just drunken, I'm afraid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top