T. A. Gardner
Thread Killer
He thinks Hitler was the good guy.
And, who is the "he" you are referring to?
He thinks Hitler was the good guy.
The Constitution is sacrosanct with regard to free speech. The MOB, of course, hates it as does the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and their PHONY media supporters.
This forum is one of the few that is the definition of free speech. ALL the others are over moderated by leftist hacks.
The Fairness Doctrine was BULLSHIT. There was nothing "fair" about it. You don't owe anyone equal time. The media owes nothing to anyone they don't want to give time to. Yes, it can appear to be unfair, but if they overdo it with one sided baloney like CNN and MSNBC, their ratings will eventually reflect it and few will give them the time of day.
What media sources allowed more free speech than we have today? Language and sexual content were much more limited. I see all kinds of speech allowed on social media and message boards. I think you have been believing fake news by those claiming "Facebook removed my post...."
Freedom of speech applies to what you say from your own soapbox. The one that YOU own.
It is nowhere implied that you are free to say anything that you want on somebody else's platform with no oversight from him/her/them.
The thing I find most telling is that those with the most closed minds are those that put the most people on 'ignore' at the slightest provocation. I put nobody on ignore, EVER!
This poll is a bit outdated being 2008.
But, according to it in 2008 The UK, France & Germany were more likely to want to live near an African, a Jew or a Asian over an Eastern European.
Of course in those nations most Eastern Europeans are Poles.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/157082/islamophobia-understanding-anti-muslim-sentiment-west.aspx
But, at least Muslims were viewed slightly more unfavorable than Eastern Europeans.
Why does speech in the public square have to be "fair" at all? So long as anyone can speak, that's fine. The fairness doctrine argues that certain commercial outlets must provide equal time even if they have to go out and find it. How fair is that? This forum is about as free as it gets. You truly have to be studious asshole to get tossed off it. There's next to no restriction on word use either. You can use all the fucking profanity you fucking please here as one example. Virtually any other forum you'd get a TOS violation for that. You can be racist, hateful, and anything else, and there are posters who certainly are here. Just about anything short of truly illegal speech (threats, porn, etc.) is allowed.
That already exists on forums like this. Most of the posts here are a reply or reaction to a previous post and I have never experienced any attempts to restrict what is said.
Who would enforce this fairness doctrine? The federal government?
"Media sources?" As i said, there is no real free speech anywhere. As for facebook, they banned me for about a year. I don't remember why. I may have used the "N" word.
He thinks Hitler was the good guy.
I wonder how many people have been banned from this forum. And why. Surely there have been many. If you ever find yourself wanting to know the truth, just let me know. Though even if you do, I doubt if it would go anywhere. From what I have seen, most people try their best to avoid the truth. As for enforcing a fairness doctrine at forums for example, try starting one first. Then worry about enforcing it.
People say the "N" word all the time on here. Both JPP and Facebook are private companies that make their own rules. If you want the government to regulate the content on JPP and Facebook that is a worse infringement than your original claim.
If you want to say the "N" word go to your public park and make a speech. It is protected speech.
So, not only do you have hundreds/thousands of more outlets to express your free speech via the internet, but the speech you express is less restricted than before (foul language, etc.). Courts allow you to advocate anything you choose which 50 years ago could be punished.
So, your entire depiction of less free speech fails in both the number of access points you have and the content of that speech.
By the way, you agreed to the Facebook terms when you chose to use their platform.
It is pretty hard to get banned on JPP. Again, it is a private entity and can make its own decision. Why don't you start your own message board and set your own rules?
You no doubt saw the title of this thread. "Free Speech vs Technology." Facebook uses technology, doesn't it. Also, the rich can say whatever the fuck they want from the comfort of a lounge chair and have the world hear it. Those who listen to it have had the shit brainwashed out of them. The vast majority of them wouldn't know the truth if it bit them in the ass. Speaking publically on a soap box in front of a federal building would likely only get you shot. A rich person could ride around in an armored car. Like the president does. But somebody like me would be fucked. It would be like living in the movie "Invasion of the body snatchers" and letting the pod people know you are a normal person. It is unlikely to end well. In a music video by Van Halen, they had various statements show up on the screen. One of them was, "The U.S. does things that you think only other countries do." That is a very true statement.
They don't want "fairness" if it disagrees with them.
If only I could tell you the truth. I have been banned at other forums for speaking the truth. Not telling lies. Any time you may be interested in knowing the truth, just let me know. In a PM. Somebody else did. It didn't go very far. Why?
View attachment 21396
I tried. It didn't work. Maybe because it was a "free" forum to set up. At another forum where there is a greater amount of freedom to speak the truth, it is attacked by people joining and pretending to be normal posters. One of them brought up a forum I tried to start. That must have took some serious NSA computing power. Because I created the thing and even I can't find it. But as long as what I have to say is the truth, why should I have to go out of my way to speak it. In some communist countries it has been known for the government to take control of private businesses. They need to do the same thing at forums. But only to the extent that they do what the Constitution does. Allow freedom of speech.
Go ahead and say the things you want to say on JPP. You could have spread a lot of your views in the time you have been complaining about a lack of free speech.
Go ahead and say the things you want to say on JPP. You could have spread a lot of your views in the time you have been complaining about a lack of free speech.
By all means give me some examples. Best would be quoting these and providing a link to that board so I can see what sort of place it is.