Genocidal Jews ignore binding ruling by world's highest court.

ZenMode said:
Nope the UN and Britain agreed to give the land to Jews and the rest to Arabs.

Slaughtering human being unfortunately, is apart of all wars. WW2 had 30 million + civilians "slaughtered". The claim here is that Israel is committing genocide. What would they have to do differently to not be committing genocide?
Click to expand...
Derp
 
IBDaMann said:
I appreciate you tipping your king right away and not wasting any more time and bandwidth.

giphy.webp
Click to expand...
Assumption of victory fallacy.
 
IBDaMann said:
Blatant lie. I'm not listening to any propaganda. You should note that I'm not listening to yours.
Click to expand...
Blatant lie.
IBDaMann said:
Delusion and denial.
Click to expand...
Argument of the Stone fallacy.
IBDaMann said:
I never accused you of being bothered by innocent children being slaughtered en masse.
It bothers me but no, you are not required to be bothered. In fact, your demand for continued increasing body count of Arab Semite children bothers me as well, but you are well within your right to pursue happiness however you define it.
Click to expand...
Pivot fallacy. The 'For the Children' argument never works.
 
Into the Night said:
The 'For the Children' argument never works.
Click to expand...
I get it. Israel kills innocent children by the tens of thousands. I express horror at the occurrence. You dismiss any concern for the lives of innocent children as a "fallacy." Smooth.

Again, I recognize that you are not required to feel any particular way about the deliberate slaughter of innocent children en masse by the intentional indirect fire pumped into civilian population centers. It's pretty shitty, but you certainly have your 1st Amendment right to not give a crap.
 
Into the Night said:
Don't try to deny your own posts
Click to expand...
I stand behind every one of my posts.

Into the Night said:
or blame on them on me.
Click to expand...
You didn't write my posts.

Into the Night said:
That won't work.
Click to expand...
Perhaps you have me confuse with someone else.

Into the Night said:
The meaning is pretty clear. You might read the Qu'ran.
Click to expand...
I have, several times. It would appear that you have no idea what "Jihad" means, or that one hundred different people will use the term in one hundred different ways.
 
IBDaMann said:
I get it. Israel kills innocent children by the tens of thousands. I express horror at the occurrence. You dismiss any concern for the lives of innocent children as a "fallacy." Smooth.

Again, I recognize that you are not required to feel any particular way about the deliberate slaughter of innocent children en masse by the intentional indirect fire pumped into civilian population centers. It's pretty shitty, but you certainly have your 1st Amendment right to not give a crap.
Click to expand...
The 'For the Children' argument never works.
 
IBDaMann said:
I stand behind every one of my posts.
Click to expand...
You just tried to deny them.
IBDaMann said:
You didn't write my posts.
Click to expand...
I never said I did.
IBDaMann said:
Perhaps you have me confuse with someone else.
Click to expand...
No, you just seem confused, since you are believing Hamas propaganda.
IBDaMann said:
I have, several times. It would appear that you have no idea what "Jihad" means, or that one hundred different people will use the term in one hundred different ways.
Click to expand...
LIF. That won't work.
 
What specifically should Israel do differently in the current situation where the are fighting war in an urban area and their government is intentionally putting their own civilians in harms way. Again...what SPECIFICALLY.

moon said:
Your premise is false. So are you. Fuck off.
Click to expand...

Ok, well, let me know if you come up with anything
 
IBDaMann said:
Incorrect. "Targeting" is not applicable to indirect fire. This is why indirect fire into civilian population centers is illegal everywhere.


Yes.


Nope. That is a red herring. There is no such thing as "sufficient warning" that justifies the massacring of civilian noncombatants, especially of those that are required to be protected.

Just as with the Global Warming religion, you simply will never call boooolsch't when you should, even on the most absurd of claims. Instead, you readily regurgitate everything you are ordered to believe.


1. Protect every single civilian noncombatant - . How?
2. Never engage in ethnic cleansing - This claim is why I'm asking SPECIFICALLY what they need to do differently.
3. Adhere to every convention to which Israel is a signatory
Click to expand...
1. Protect every single civilian noncombatant - . How?

2. Never engage in ethnic cleansing - This claim is why I'm asking SPECIFICALLY what they need to do differently.

3. Adhere to every convention to which Israel is a signatory - You're only repeating your claims of genocide. What specifically do they need to do differently?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top