On Obama's watch he had the lowest GDP on record of any President.
Actually no. GDP was never higher, in all of American history to that point, than it was on Obama's watch. I suspect you were trying to make some other point, rather than outright lying, but it's always hard to tell with you, so just let me know if you'd like to take another shot at that talking point.
On Obama's watch we had the first record Trillion dollar deficits, four years, in American history.
The first trillion-dollar deficit happened under Bush.
On Obama's watch we had a record accumulation of debt amounting to almost ten trillion dollars.
You could say of many presidents that we had a "record accumulation of debt," to that point. No president before the younger Bush had run up as much debt as he did. No president before Reagan ran up as much debt as he did. FDR and Wilson also set records. Because of how inflation works, it's not unusual to set a new record, in nominal terms, every few years.
On Obama's watch we had the most anemic recovery in modern history.
No. That would be the first of Reagan's recovery. It was so anemic that it died within a year.
Yet morons like you still think he was great
When have I ever claimed he was great? Be specific, please. If you're honest, you'll see I haven't said that. Instead, I simply pointed out how much money Obamacare saved the American people. That hurts your feelings, because you hate Obama and want to believe everything he did was bad. But the numbers are there. You can check them yourself to confirm that what I said is right.
Lie and lame; trying to pin the 2000 recession on Bush is dishonest, stupid and a lie.
There was no 2000 recession. You're confused. Read more.
As for the surpluses turning to deficits; can you name ANY wars in our history where we fought wars without deficits.
Not off the top of my head -- and that's one big reason that we should avoid wars of choice..... like Bush's hare-brained decision to conquer Iraq in a search for a pile of mythical WMDs. Bad decisions have bad consequences, including massive deficits.
Again, you are being a willful, dishonest and deceitful dumbass.
What dishonesty? What deception? Be specific, please. And keep in mind that "dishonest" doesn't mean "that which makes impotent right-wingers feel bad about themselves."
As for job creation; he had to deal with the Clinton Recession
There was no Clinton recession. Read more.
Yes, if he'd been able to prevent 9/11, we'd have been better off. Unfortunately, back when security professionals were running around with their hair on fire warning of a coming attack, Bush was taking a month-long holiday at his country estate. If he'd been a competent president, would he have stopped the attacks? We'll never know.
What lying? Be specific, please: what is it that you think I've said that's a lie?
BUT, I will continue the debate along these lines
Agreed. Something cannot be continued until after it has been started, and since I've never seen you commit an act that could fairly be called debating, it is logically impossible for you to continue debating along these lines, or any lines.
what policies do Democrats support that reduces poverty
Expanded educational spending, improved access to health care, affirmative action, labor protections, regulations against predatory lending and similar schemes for preying on the poor, support for higher minimum wages, tighter enforcement of overtime laws, subsidized student loans, nutritional assistance for poor mothers and children, etc.
Many of the same things listed above.
and balances the Federal budget? [/size]
Higher upper-class and corporate taxes, and less wasteful military spending.
