What? There is nothing bad about that. When it appears for a second you are going to get in an accident on a motorcycle you get that adreneline rush...I mean, is there anything that you people won't post on this board?
<-- Looking innocent.
What? There is nothing bad about that. When it appears for a second you are going to get in an accident on a motorcycle you get that adreneline rush...I mean, is there anything that you people won't post on this board?
What? There is nothing bad about that. When it appears for a second you are going to get in an accident on a motorcycle you get that adreneline rush...
<-- Looking innocent.
LOL. Oh nooeoees!!111 shift + 1 !!11I'm sorry, I am going to have to report this post to Doniston anyway.
You know, I had a "tryst" with a girlfriend in a stall in a women's bathroom once.
And if we had been caught by a cop, we would have been detained and fined (and rightly so) contrary to Rstringfield's fevered imagination of "liberal hypocrisy"
So in your view the officer should have gone ahead and let the senator give him a BJ before arresting him ?Strawman...
We are not discussing having sex in a public restroom. We are talking about making a pass here.
What are you babbling about? Neither heterosexuals nor homosexuals should be having sex in public bathrooms.
The officer at least should have ensured he meant for the activity to take place in the restroom. Making a pass in the restroom isn't the same thing as actually working to have sex in the same.So in your view the officer should have gone ahead and let the senator give him a BJ before arresting him ?
Hmm is this making you nervous ?
Well, now that we are getting more info, it seems there may have been lewd conduct, .e.g., the peering into the stall. We still are not talking about having sex.
It has never happened to me. I have also never seen or heard such an act taking place in any public restroom I have ever entered.Well for those libertains who expect to get gay advances in the bathroom while taking a crap.....
The officer at least should have ensured he meant for the activity to take place in the restroom. Making a pass in the restroom isn't the same thing as actually working to have sex in the same.
You seem to consider yourself an expert on the ettiquite of bathroom sex Damocles, myself, I freely admit this is the one subject in the whole world RJS is ignorant of, and happily so?
Well, it is an unfortunate truth that Damocles has indeed never had sex in a public restroom.You seem to consider yourself an expert on the ettiquite of bathroom sex Damocles, myself, I freely admit this is the one subject in the whole world RJS is ignorant of, and happily so?
Proper doesn't mean illegal though. One can be totally offensive and still not break a law. I can't believe that the law intends for idiots to be disallowed to make sloppy passes, it is meant to stop actual sexual behavior in the public restroom.Call me oldf ashioned but I do not think getting propositioned even by a person of the opposite sex while taking a crap is any ways proper.
Proper doesn't mean illegal though. One can be totally offensive and still not break a law. I can't believe that the law intends for idiots to be disallowed to make sloppy passes, it is meant to stop actual sexual behavior in the public restroom.
If some idiot made a pass at me in a restroom I'd tell him "Ewwww!" and move on.
Why? Do you fear he might be successful if you don't punch him?It might well turn out to be an assault charge on me....
I would consider it an extremely serious violation of my space.
Secure? It is a public restroom. As I said, it isn't the place you'd expect, but what harm would come of it?It might well turn out to be an assault charge on me....
I would consider it an extremely serious violation of my space.
A bar or someplace now is another matter butt in a secure airport restroom...