Is the Bible Literally True? No, of Course Not!

[gfm7175]

COff-coff-BULLSHIT-coff coff

Are you coming down with a cold?

Maybe it's COVID... no wait, it's definitely COVID... Have you had all your jabs? Of course you have... that's why you're getting sick... AGAIN....

 

[gfm7175]

Wow..... just wow. I'm speechless.

There is clearly no path forward for a useful discussion.

Right. You wish to be dishonest, so whenever you're met with honesty, there's no path forward for you. You simply turn back towards the cold embrace of your dishonesty.

 

[gfm7175]

Absolutely NONE OF WHICH YOU UNDERSTAND.

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!

But I bet if the doctor told you that you needed a PET scan you'd do it no problem whatsoever.

Why would I do that? ... Nah, that's what the Branch Covidians did... Their doctor told them that they needed umpteen mRNA jabs and they did it no problem whatsoever. I bet you're one of them.

Because you don't know anything about any of this stuff.

About what stuff?? Not knowing anything seems to be YOUR issue...

(Feel free to google what a PET scan is)

No need.

 

[ZenMode]

Right. You wish to be dishonest, so whenever you're met with honesty, there's no path forward for you. You simply turn back towards the cold embrace of your dishonesty.

I'm not being dishonest about anything and my reaction has nothing to do with a basic fact that you're being honest. My reaction is due to the content of your honesty. I'm rarely shocked. I've debated with white nationalist/neo-nazis who have honestly expressed belief in conspiracy theories that left my jaw on the floor. I know of Muslims who have justified a level of immorality, in the name of religion, that were so abhorrent that I thought I misunderstood.

What you honestly expressed, in the year 2024, was the most shocking thing I've heard/read in a decade.

 

[gfm7175]

I'm not being dishonest about anything and my reaction has nothing to do with a basic fact that you're being honest. My reaction is due to the content of your honesty. I'm rarely shocked. I've debated with white nationalist/neo-nazis who have honestly expressed belief in conspiracy theories that left my jaw on the floor. I know of Muslims who have justified a level of immorality, in the name of religion, that were so abhorrent that I thought I misunderstood.

What you honestly expressed, in the year 2024, was the most shocking thing I've heard/read in a decade.

You're TOO FUNNY!

 

[Kafka]

RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!


Why would I do that? ... Nah, that's what the Branch Covidians did... Their doctor told them that they needed umpteen mRNA jabs and they did it no problem whatsoever. I bet you're one of them.


About what stuff?? Not knowing anything seems to be YOUR issue...


No need.

Yeah, as I suspected. You know nothing of value in this conversation. You have ZERO clue.

 

[gfm7175]

Yeah, as I suspected. You know nothing of value in this conversation. You have ZERO clue.

You sound jabbed to the hilt....

 

[Kafka]

You sound jabbed to the hilt....

Thanks, Into the Night. Your concern for my health(?) is touching. But, Ibdaman, you shouldn't worry about me. But thanks anyway.

 

[IBDaMann]

HE IS RISEN!!!

An atheist might be tempted to respond "HE IS LEAVENED!!!" ... although said atheist might also refrain from such.

 

[IBDaMann]

Wow..... just wow. I'm speechless. There is clearly no path forward for a useful discussion.

We've been over this. The reason is that you haven't demonstrated any ability to positively contribute to any discussions at the adults' table.

 

[ZenMode]

We've been over this. The reason is that you haven't demonstrated any ability to positively contribute to any discussions at the adults' table.

I hear that a lot from racists, white supremacist, conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, the far rights and far left.

 

[IBDaMann]

I hear that a lot from racists, white supremacist, conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, the far rights and far left.

... *or* you are a typical dishonest leftist who labels, in knee-jerk fashion, as RACIST! anyone who does not tout your intolerant, fucked-up, science-denying, tyranny-ushering, HATE-filled religion as somehow being science ... because that's all you know how to do. It's not like you ever put any effort into acquiring any education, and now your only option for making it through the day without allowing your self-loathing and insufferable regret to compel you to slit your wrists is to hurl petty slurs at others who weren't as stupid as you and who never fell for the same scam that sucked you in.

I wonder which understanding is correct. Hmmmmmm.

I see you still have no science to support your stupid religion that you call "science". I see that you still haven't provided any value-added contributions to this forum, i.e. you are only here to receive accurate information while dispensing only misinformation that you have been ordered to regurgitate.

I can see why you are a self-loather.

 

[ZenMode]

... *or* you are a typical dishonest leftist who labels, in knee-jerk fashion, as RACIST! anyone who does not tout your intolerant, fucked-up, science-denying, tyranny-ushering, HATE-filled religion as somehow being science ... because that's all you know how to do. It's not like you ever put any effort into acquiring any education, and now your only option for making it through the day without allowing your self-loathing and insufferable regret to compel you to slit your wrists is to hurl petty slurs at others who weren't as stupid as you and who never fell for the same scam that sucked you in.

I wonder which understanding is correct. Hmmmmmm.

I see you still have no science to support your stupid religion that you call "science". I see that you still haven't provided any value-added contributions to this forum, i.e. you are only here to receive accurate information while dispensing only misinformation that you have been ordered to regurgitate.

I can see why you are a self-loather.

A leftist? Based on what? Is it because I think climate change might be real? Is it because I think Trump is a 275lb pile of shit? You think you have to be a leftist to recognize that? You don't even have to be a Democrat to see that.

I haven't voted for a Dem for President since BILL Clinton....his first term. I didn't vote for Gore, Obama, Hillary or Biden.

And what does climate change or gender dysphoria have to do with race?

 

[IBDaMann]

A leftist? Based on what?

Based on your refusal to define your terms or to answer simple clarification questions about your position.

Is it because I think climate change might be real?

Nope. It's because you won't unambiguously define what it is that you think might be real. There are uncountably infinite undefined things that might be real, except that you picked one that violates physics in multiple ways, precluding it from being real, and yet you insist that I should consider to somehow be settled science.

Is it because I think Trump is a 275lb pile of shit?

Nope. It is because you insist that Trump is a pile of shit while simultaneously refusing to specify how Trump was somehow not the US' best President ever, considering only his official duties as President (no Tweets, no campaign ads, no personal affairs).

You think you have to be a leftist to recognize that?

Yes, one has to be a leftist to achieve your level of dishonesty without even flinching.

You don't even have to be a Democrat to see that.

Democrats are the ones who hold the most dishonesty potential.

I haven't voted for a Dem for President since BILL Clinton....his first term. I didn't vote for Gore, Obama, Hillary or Biden.

That has nothing to do with anything. There are many Marxists in other countries who have similarly never voted in US elections.

And what does climate change or gender dysphoria have to do with race?

You were the one who associated adherence to the scientific method with racists, white supremacist, conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, the far rights and far left. Why don't you answer that question?

 

[ZenMode]

Based on your refusal to define your terms or to answer simple clarification questions about your position.

Interesting. What would you call someone who pretends to be baffled by the simplest of terms to avoid answering the simplest of questions?

Nope. It's because you won't unambiguously define what it is that you think might be real. There are uncountably infinite undefined things that might be real, except that you picked one that violates physics in multiple ways, precluding it from being real, and yet you insist that I should consider to somehow be settled science.

Die with the lie, baby!

Nope. It is because you insist that Trump is a pile of shit while simultaneously refusing to specify how Trump was somehow not the US' best President ever, considering only his official duties as President (no Tweets, no campaign ads, no personal affairs).

I've never commented on how good of a president Trump was.

Yes, one has to be a leftist to achieve your level of dishonesty without even flinching.

Says the person who continues to pretend to be confused by the most basic of words.

Democrats are the ones who hold the most dishonesty potential.

No. The potential is equal. The current leader of the Republican party is setting the standard for dishonesty.

That has nothing to do with anything. There are many Marxists in other countries who have similarly never voted in US elections.

Because they can't, you impossibly dishonest fool.

You were the one who associated adherence to the scientific method with racists, white supremacist, conspiracy theorists, religious extremists, the far rights and far left. Why don't you answer that question?

Nope. I, as you know but pretend you don't, was just pointing out that lots of shitty people take issue with me..... because I'm not generally a shitty person.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

this thread is a paid political announcement from the Free Evangelical Church of Atheism........

 

[Kafka]

this thread is a paid political announcement from the Free Evangelical Church of Atheism........

So you are a literalist? (You know there are many sects of Christianity that are NOT literalist,right?)

 

[IBDaMann]

this thread is a paid political announcement from the Free Evangelical Church of Atheism........

Pleae explain to me this "evangelical" nature.

 

[IBDaMann]

Interesting. What would you call someone who pretends to be baffled by the simplest of terms to avoid answering the simplest of questions?

Clearly he or she is someone waiting for further clarification from someone who is dishonestly attempting to hijack terms and to not reveal that he or she is merely interrupting the conversation at the adults' table.

I've never commented on how good of a president Trump was.

I've never commented on your commenting, or lack thereof. I simply commented on your refusal to explain why Trump isn't the best US President EV-AH, considering only his official duties.

Says the person who continues [waiting for further clarification from someone who is dishonestly attempting to hijack terms and to not reveal that he or she is merely interrupting the conversation at the adults' table]

Correct.

No. The potential is equal.

Nope. See why below.

The current leader of the Republican party is setting the standard for dishonesty.

It very well could be the case that he is a RINO, or that you are being your standard dishonest self and merely claiming that his honesty is somehow dishonesty. In your standard dishonest fashion, you were not specific.

... because I'm not generally a shitty person.

I would be inclined to agree. From what you have posted, all that can be said about you is that you are scientifically illiterate and usually dishonest. For some reason, you also HATE when others try to help you.

 

[ZenMode]

Clearly he or she is someone waiting for further clarification from someone who is dishonestly attempting to hijack terms and to not reveal that he or she is merely interrupting the conversation at the adults' table.


I've never commented on your commenting, or lack thereof. I simply commented on your refusal to explain why Trump isn't the best US President EV-AH, considering only his official duties.


Correct.


Nope. See why below.


It very well could be the case that he is a RINO, or that you are being your standard dishonest self and merely claiming that his honesty is somehow dishonesty. In your standard dishonest fashion, you were not specific.


I would be inclined to agree. From what you have posted, all that can be said about you is that you are scientifically illiterate and usually dishonest. For some reason, you also HATE when others try to help you.

You just continue to play games. You expect me to believe that the concept of health is so baffling for you that you can't say there's a difference in health between a stage 4 cancer patient minutes from death, and a young, athletic, disease and ailment free 20 year old?

Your commitment to dishonesty is impressive and embarrassing.