Is the Bible Literally True? No, of Course Not!

Yes, it's speculation... an educated guess based on available information.
Excellent. This is a totally valid sentiment.

There are some things that are believed with a higher level of confidence than others.
Immaterial. If you believe it, you have confidence in it. If you don't have confidence in it, you don't believe it.

But, for reasons that are obvious, you avoided my last question because,
Incorrect. I did not avoid answering your question; I tried to answer it, but you thwarted my efforts by refusing to clairify.
 
Excellent. This is a totally valid sentiment.


Immaterial. If you believe it, you have confidence in it. If you don't have confidence in it, you don't believe it.


Incorrect. I did not avoid answering your question; I tried to answer it, but you thwarted my efforts by refusing to clairify.

Just like the health question, you become confused, conveniently, when it's something you don't want to respond to. The rest of the time, you are a faux intellectual who is ready to explain quantum mechanics to me.

No matter...I knew you wouldn't actually answer.
 
Last edited:
Actually, I can make up numbers.
You cannot make up numbers and use them as 'data', Sock. Argument from randU fallacy.
It's called a hypothetical, which is used to make a point.
Buzzword fallacy. Learn what a 'hypothesis' is. You are not making a point.
A point that both you and IDDaMann avoided responding to... for reasons that are as obvious as the sky is blue.
You are not making a point.

The sky is not necessarily blue.
It can be white, gray, gunmetal green, black, yellow, orange, or any number of colors.
And it can also be blue.
 
You cannot make up numbers and use them as 'data', Sock. Argument from randU fallacy.

Buzzword fallacy. Learn what a 'hypothesis' is. You are not making a point.

You are not making a point.

The sky is not necessarily blue.
It can be white, gray, gunmetal green, black, yellow, orange, or any number of colors.
And it can also be blue.

No, actually I can make up numbers. I know that because I just did. And I never portrayed them as actual data. In fact, if you weren't such a dishonest person, we wouldn't even be having this conversation because you would acknowledge I made it clear it was a hypothetical. I made it clear it was hypothetical.

But, again, that would require you to be honest.
 
No, actually I can make up numbers. I know that because I just did. And I never portrayed them as actual data.
Blatant lie.
In fact, if you weren't such a dishonest person,
You are describing yourself again.
we wouldn't even be having this conversation because you would acknowledge I made it clear it was a hypothetical. I made it clear it was hypothetical.
Blatant lie.
But, again, that would require you to be honest.
Inversion fallacy.

You cannot deny your own post, Sock.
 
Just like the health question, you become confused, conveniently, when it's something you don't want to respond to. The rest of the time, you are a faux intellectual who is ready to explain quantum mechanics to me.

No matter...I knew you wouldn't actually answer.

Inversion fallacy. The question is asked of YOU, Sock. Define 'health'.
 
Blatant lie.

You are describing yourself again.

Blatant lie.

Inversion fallacy.

You cannot deny your own post, Sock.

And, as usual, the avoidance starts. Into the PaddedRoom, when I ask a question that he can't answer without proving himself wrong, starts doing the "Look over there! No, now look over there!"

IBDaMannOfAvoidance suddenly becomes an pro in quantum mechanics, but simple English terms are baffling. :laugh:
 
Last edited:
You are describing yourself again, Sock. You cannot project YOUR problems on anybody else.
Evasion. Answer the question put to you.

mr_chang_senor_chang_laugh_spits_milk.gif
 
And, as usual, the avoidance starts. Into the PaddedRoom, when I ask a question that he can't answer without proving himself wrong, starts doing the "Look over there! No, now look over there!"

IBDaMannOfAvoidance suddenly becomes an pro in quantum mechanics, but simple English terms are baffling. :laugh:

RQAA. Evasion. Answer the question put to you.
 
IBDaMannOfAvoidance suddenly becomes an pro in quantum mechanics, but simple English terms are baffling.
EvadeMode suddenly realized that he's not the expert in quantum mechanics that other leftists assured him he was.

btw ... my becoming a pro in quantum mechanics is long-standing, not sudden. My acumen was made possible by having learned my tenses early in life. As for you, it's never too late to learn them. Being able to discern the past tense from the future tense has major advantages.
 
EvadeMode suddenly realized that he's not the expert in quantum mechanics that other leftists assured him he was.

btw ... my becoming a pro in quantum mechanics is long-standing, not sudden. My acumen was made possible by having learned my tenses early in life. As for you, it's never too late to learn them. Being able to discern the past tense from the future tense has major advantages.

Lots of words, but no answer.

Whenever you're ready to answer my question and move on.... I'll be here.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top