Lesbian criticizes Picasso.

[BidenPresident]

Some day you'll tell me what your sui generis definitions are.

Easy. Art has nothing to do with objective or subjective truth. Your turn.

 

[BidenPresident]

What quality specifically?

The quality of being well made.

 

[BidenPresident]

Subjective what? People are subjects. So everything is subjective. If you follow that logic.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Easy. Art has nothing to do with objective or subjective truth. Your turn.

That's not a definition.

Are you thinking that TECHNICAL expertise is the key? How do you explain Rothko? What about Pollock?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

The quality of being well made.

So no technical details? Just "quality"?

 

[BidenPresident]

That's not a definition.

Are you thinking that TECHNICAL expertise is the key? How do you explain Rothko?

I really don't know what technical expertise means. And Rothko is a good artist.

 

[BidenPresident]

So no technical details? Just "quality"?

Does "well made" literally mean nothing to you?! First time you heard the concept?

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Subjective what? People are subjects. So everything is subjective. If you follow that logic.

Different defintion. Try hitting up the dictionary:

"based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Contrasted with objective."

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Does "well made" literally mean nothing to you?! First time you heard the concept?

I honestly thought you were going to tell me something about the technical quality.

 

[BidenPresident]

Different defintion. Try hitting up the dictionary:

"based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Contrasted with objective."

Persons have feelings. Does that bother you? Seriously.

 

[BidenPresident]

I honestly thought you were going to tell me something about the technical quality.

Why, I never said I was going to do that.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

I really don't know what technical expertise means. And Rothko is a good artist.

So it's not technique you are talking about. Sounds like personal preference. That's subjective.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Why, I never said I was going to do that.

I was just hoping you had a valid point that we could discuss. Right now I don't accept any of your points.

If you can't define your terms and you refuse to actually explain you point then your point remains opaque.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Persons have feelings. Does that bother you? Seriously.

Let's stick with the words and their definitions.

 

[BidenPresident]

So it's not technique you are talking about. Sounds like personal preference. That's subjective.

You tell me what "technique" means. To me it just means the way something is made.

 

[BidenPresident]

Let's stick with the words and their definitions.

Ok. Again, what does subjective or objective mean in relation to art. I see a painting. Without eyes or a body I would not see.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Easy. Art has nothing to do with objective or subjective truth. Your turn.

Ex cathedra statements. You carry no weight so I'm just going to disagree.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

Ok. Again, what does subjective or objective mean in relation to art. I see a painting. Without eyes or a body I would not see.

"based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Contrasted with objective."

This is pretty simple.

 

[Saint Guinefort]

You tell me what "technique" means. To me it just means the way something is made.

Perhaps if you had some art classes you could discuss the techniques. Since you clearly don't it seems we are back to just talking taste. You like PIcasso, I think he's shit.

Do you like EVERY SINGLE ARTIST who ever lived?

 

[BidenPresident]

"based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions. Contrasted with objective."

This is pretty simple.

So feeling is bad?